Robert Vanden Eynde writes:
> Not for control characters.
There's a standard convention for "naming" control characters (U+,
U+0001, etc), which is recommended by the Unicode Standard (in
slightly generalized form) for characters that otherwise don't have
names, as "code point labels". This
No one talked about this, but modern cpus with multiple numa nodes are
atrocious to any shared memory (maybe threadripper is better, but
multiple socket xeon is slow) and more and more all cpus will move to
it on single chips, so a share nothing aproach can really make python
a good contender on mo
On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 11:27 AM, David Foster wrote:
> * The Actor model can be used with some effort via the “multiprocessing”
> module, but it doesn’t seem that streamlined and forces there to be a
> separate OS process per line of execution, which is relatively expensive.
What do you mean by "
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 11:27 AM, David Foster wrote:
>> * The Actor model can be used with some effort via the “multiprocessing”
>> module, but it doesn’t seem that streamlined and forces there to be a
>> separate OS process per line of e
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 11:27 AM, David Foster wrote:
>>> * The Actor model can be used with some effort via the “multiprocessing”
>>> module, but it doesn’t seem that streamlined
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 11:27 AM, David Foster wrote:
* The Actor model can be used with some effort via the “mult
What about the following model: you have N Python interpreters, each with
their own GIL. Each *Python* object belongs to precisely one interpreter.
However, the interpreters share some common data storage: perhaps a shared
Numpy array, or a shared Sqlite in-memory db. Or some key-value store where
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Stephan Houben wrote:
> What about the following model: you have N Python interpreters, each with
> their own GIL. Each *Python* object belongs to precisely one interpreter.
>
> However, the interpreters share some common data storage: perhaps a shared
> Numpy arra
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> Sorry, I'm not sure if you mean my proposed alias() function isn't
> useful, or Robert's try...except loop around it.
I was questioning the utility of "If the abbreviation list is sorted
by AdditionToUnicodeDate."
But since you ask, neither function is useful TO ME, a
