On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 06:46:21PM -0800, Mike Miller wrote:
> Also, I don't believe the confusion mentioned was regarding syntax, but
> rather a word that most people have never heard before.
When I started learning Python, back when 1.5 was new and cutting edge,
it was an embarassingly long t
Hi,the list,
I'm wondering why Barrier object does not exist in the synchronization
primitives of the asyncio lib while it is present in threading and
multiprocessing libs ?
This may not be the right place to ask this question, but I never found an
answer on the web.
Thanks for your help.
Yves
> On 25 Feb 2021, at 13:14, Yves Duprat wrote:
>
> Hi,the list,
>
> I'm wondering why Barrier object does not exist in the synchronization
> primitives of the asyncio lib while it is present in threading and
> multiprocessing libs ?
> This may not be the right place to ask this question, bu
It does make sense to have a barrier synchronization primitive for asyncio.
The idea is to make a coroutine block until at least X coroutines are
waiting to enter the barrier.
This is very useful, if certain actions need to be synchronized.
Recently, I had to implement a barier myself for our use
On 2021-02-24 19:59, Christopher Barker wrote:
I used to do that — for years. But it really did cause problems.
The trick is that you have, say, your 57 apps all working. Then you need to
update a package for one. As soon as you update, you have to go test your 57
apps, and if one of them is b
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 19:22, Mike Miller wrote:
> Mr. Random had an interesting point to start this thread, that over-reliance
> on
> venvs may have slowed fixes and improvements on the standard tools and
> distributions. I suspect there is some truth to the assertion.
Arguably, your claim tha
On 2021-02-25 01:05, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 06:46:21PM -0800, Mike Miller wrote:
Also, I don't believe the confusion mentioned was regarding syntax, but
rather a word that most people have never heard before.
When I started learning Python, back when 1.5 was new and
Hi Jonathan
Le 25/02/2021 à 18:15, Jonathan
Slenders a écrit :
It does make sense to have a barrier synchronization
primitive for asyncio.
The idea is to make a coroutine block until at least X
coroutines are wait
> On 25 Feb 2021, at 17:15, Jonathan Slenders wrote:
>
> It does make sense to have a barrier synchronization primitive for asyncio.
> The idea is to make a coroutine block until at least X coroutines are waiting
> to enter the barrier.
> This is very useful, if certain actions need to be sync
David Mertz writes:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:38 PM Paul Korir wrote:
>
> > I've been using the argparse library for a long time and one use case that
> > repeatedly shows us is the need to have two arguments appear together i.e
> > either both appear or none of them appear. I'll refer to
10 matches
Mail list logo
