On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 10:23, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 21:01, Stephen J. Turnbull
> wrote:
> > What I think is more interesting than simpler (but more robust for
> > what they can do) facilities is better parser support in standard
> > libraries (not just Python's), and
Chris Angelico writes:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 01:54, Stephen J. Turnbull
> wrote:
> > That is, all regexp implementations support the same basic
> > language which is sufficient for most tasks most programmers want
> > regexps for.
>
> The problem is that that's an illusion.
It isn't
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 21:01, Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
>
> Chris Angelico writes:
> > On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 01:54, Stephen J. Turnbull
> > wrote:
>
> > > That is, all regexp implementations support the same basic
> > > language which is sufficient for most tasks most programmers want
> >
On 2022-02-16 10:45, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 09:44:07AM -0300, Soni L. wrote:
> > This might be a silly idea but, would it be a good idea to have
> > ...[a:b:c] return a range(a, b, c)?
>
> Similar ideas have been suggested before:
>
>
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 14:47, Valentin Berlier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been thinking that it would be nice if regex match objects could be
> deconstructed with pattern matching. For example, a simple .obj parser could
> use it like this:
>
> match re.match(r"(v|f) (\d+) (\d+) (\d+)", line):
See https://bugs.python.org/issue46692. It's not so easy to make match
objects mappings or sequences because of the len() problem.
Eric
On 2/16/2022 9:46 AM, Valentin Berlier wrote:
Hi,
I've been thinking that it would be nice if regex match objects could be
deconstructed with pattern
Thanks for the previous mail.
I would like to highlight the value my thought offers to the developers.
They often have to write classes while writing a module. In the class, they
are supposed to write classes and objects. In a class, typically the
attributes are private, and we have getters and
16.02.22 14:44, Soni L. пише:
> This might be a silly idea but, would it be a good idea to have
> ...[a:b:c] return a range(a, b, c)?
See PEP 204.
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0204/
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To
> This might be a silly idea but, would it be a good idea to have
> ...[a:b:c] return a range(a, b, c)?
This sort of highly-subjective syntactic sugar makes me wonder whether
there would be support for a standard python preprocessor, like what was
suggested in PEP 638 [1].
[1]:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 00:18, Avanish Gupta wrote:
>
> Thanks for the previous mail.
> I would like to highlight the value my thought offers to the developers. They
> often have to write classes while writing a module. In the class, they are
> supposed to write classes and objects. In a class,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022, 5:46 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 10:23, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 21:01, Stephen J. Turnbull
> > wrote:
>
> > > What I think is more interesting than simpler (but more robust for
> > > what they can do) facilities is better
Hi,
I've been thinking that it would be nice if regex match objects could be
deconstructed with pattern matching. For example, a simple .obj parser could
use it like this:
match re.match(r"(v|f) (\d+) (\d+) (\d+)", line):
case ["v", x, y, z]:
print("Handle vertex")
This might be a silly idea but, would it be a good idea to have
...[a:b:c] return a range(a, b, c)?
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 09:44:07AM -0300, Soni L. wrote:
> This might be a silly idea but, would it be a good idea to have
> ...[a:b:c] return a range(a, b, c)?
Similar ideas have been suggested before:
Are you aware of https://docs.python.org/3.10/library/dataclasses.html?
That essentially provides a way to generate the boilerplate without having
to put it all in your code.
El mié, 16 feb 2022 a las 5:20, Avanish Gupta ()
escribió:
> Thanks for the previous mail.
> I would like to highlight
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 03:43:54PM +0530, Avanish Gupta wrote:
> I would like to highlight the value my thought offers to the developers.
> They often have to write classes while writing a module. In the class, they
> are supposed to write classes and objects. In a class, typically the
>
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 08:33, J.B. Langston wrote:
>
> Well, I certainly sparked a lot of interesting discussion, which I have quite
> enjoyed reading. But to bring this thread back around to its original topic,
> is there support among the Python maintainers for adding a timeout feature to
>
Well, I certainly sparked a lot of interesting discussion, which I have quite
enjoyed reading. But to bring this thread back around to its original topic, is
there support among the Python maintainers for adding a timeout feature to the
Python re library? I will look at the third-party regex
[J.B. Langston ]
> Well, I certainly sparked a lot of interesting discussion, which I have
> quite enjoyed reading. But to bring this thread back around to its
> original topic, is there support among the Python maintainers for
> adding a timeout feature to the Python re library?
Buried in the
Thanks for the conclusive answer. I will checkout the regex library soon.
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
On 2022-02-16 22:13, Tim Peters wrote:
[J.B. Langston ]
Well, I certainly sparked a lot of interesting discussion, which I have
quite enjoyed reading. But to bring this thread back around to its
original topic, is there support among the Python maintainers for
adding a timeout feature to the
[MRAB ]
> I eventually decided against having it added to the standard library
> because that would tie fixes and additions to Python's release cycle,
> and there's that adage that Python has "batteries included", but not
> nuclear reactors. PyPI is a better place for it, for those who need more
>
>
> > This might be a silly idea but, would it be a good idea to have
> > ...[a:b:c] return a range(a, b, c)?
>
If a 'thunderscore' is acceptable:
import itertools
class _ranger:
@classmethod
def __getitem__(self, key: slice):
if isinstance(key, slice):
if key.stop is
[J.B. Langston ]
> Thanks for the conclusive answer.
Not conclusive - just my opinion. Which is informed, but not infallible ;-)
> I will checkout the regex library soon.
You may not realize how easy this is? Just in case: go to a shell and type
pip install regex
(or, on Windows, "python -m
> On 17 Feb 2022, at 01:04, Tim Peters wrote:
>
> [J.B. Langston ]
>> Thanks for the conclusive answer.
>
> Not conclusive - just my opinion. Which is informed, but not infallible ;-)
>
>> I will checkout the regex library soon.
>
> You may not realize how easy this is? Just in case: go
25 matches
Mail list logo
