On 16.10.2016 19:02, Nick Timkovich wrote:
Functions are great; I'm a big fan of functions. That said, the group
of heapq.heap* functions are literally OOP without using that "class"
word. As far as flexibility, what is the use of the those functions on
non-heap structures?
IIRC the statement w
> As I said, it has been discussed and the consensus so far was: "not
> everything needs to be a class if it does not provide substantial benefit" +
> "functions are more flexible" + "if it's slower that the original it won't
> happen".
(These) functions are less flexible here. heapq forbids th
Functions are great; I'm a big fan of functions. That said, the group
of heapq.heap* functions are literally OOP without using that "class"
word. As far as flexibility, what is the use of the those functions on
non-heap structures?
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
> On 15.10.
On 15.10.2016 23:19, Nick Timkovich wrote:
Features and speed are good, but I'm interested in getting something
with the basic features into the Standard Library so it's just there.
Not having done that before and bit clueless, I'm wanting to learn
that slightly less-technical procedure. What are
Features and speed are good, but I'm interested in getting something
with the basic features into the Standard Library so it's just there.
Not having done that before and bit clueless, I'm wanting to learn
that slightly less-technical procedure. What are the steps to make
that happen?
On Sat, Oct
On 15.10.2016 20:15, Nick Timkovich wrote:
I once again had a use for heaps, and after rewrapping the heapq.heap*
methods for the umpteenth time, figured I'd try my hand at freezing
off that wart.
We re-discussed this in the beginning of 2016 and xheap
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/xheap was on
I once again had a use for heaps, and after rewrapping the heapq.heap*
methods for the umpteenth time, figured I'd try my hand at freezing
off that wart.
Some research turned up an older thread by Facundo Batista
(https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2009-April/004173.html),
but it seems
