Moreover, when I read "explicit self" is a wart, then I think, "you have
absolutely no idea how fantastic 'explicit self' is".
Thus, inferring from a single data-point these seems to be personal
"dislike lists".
In this regard, I tend to prefer Guido's one before any others if there
is even
Guido van Rossum writes:
> AFAIK the term comes from a piece by Andrew Kuchling titled "Python warts".
> The topic now has its own wiki page:
> https://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonWarts
>
> I believe that most of the warts are not even design missteps -- they are
> emergent misfeatures,
AFAIK the term comes from a piece by Andrew Kuchling titled "Python warts".
The topic now has its own wiki page:
https://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonWarts
I believe that most of the warts are not even design missteps -- they are
emergent misfeatures, meaning nobody could have predicted how things
On 01/12/2017 03:21 PM, Random832 wrote:
Just out of curiosity... in your estimation, what is a "wart", and why
is the term "wart" used for it? I mean, this is an accepted term that
the Python community uses to refer to things [...]
I do not see any difference between calling something a
I feel I have to respond to this one.
More than half of what I suggested could have and should be implemented.
In particular the truthiness of non-boolean data and the lack of a
reasonable SQL syntax. Several other points have been discussed
endlessly on the internet but without a
