On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 09:26:12 -0400
David Mertz wrote:
> I agree here. I briefly urged against using the less used TOML format, but
> I have no real skin in the game around packaging. I like YAML, but that's
> also not in the standard library, even if more widely used.
Agreed with David. Also,
If I had the energy to argue it I would also argue against using TOML
> in those PEPs.
I partook in that discussion, and I still have no idea why TOML was chosen,
over, say, a defined subset of YAML, or a slightly extended JSON.
But the folks that were highly invested and putting the work in
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 4:53 AM Erik Bray wrote:
> If I had the energy to argue it I would also argue against using TOML
> in those PEPs. I personally don't especially care for TOML and what's
> "obvious" to Tom is not at all obvious to me. I'd rather just stick
> with YAML or perhaps something
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:49 PM Jimmy Girardet wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi Jimmy and welcome! :)
>
> I don't know if this was already debated but I don't know how to search
> in the whole archive of the list.
>
>
> For now the adoption of pyproject.toml file is more difficult because
> toml is not in
I agree here. I briefly urged against using the less used TOML format, but
I have no real skin in the game around packaging. I like YAML, but that's
also not in the standard library, even if more widely used.
But given that packaging is committed to TOML, I think that's a strong case
for
>> He's referring to PEPs 518 and 517 [1], which indeed standardize on
>> TOML as a file format for Python package build metadata.
>>
>> I think moving anything into the stdlib would be premature though –
>> TOML libraries are under active development, and the general trend in
>> the packaging
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:23 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:55 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 09:10:40AM +0200, Jimmy Girardet wrote:
> >> Each tool which wants to use pyproject.toml has to add a toml lib as a
> >> conditional or hard
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:55 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 09:10:40AM +0200, Jimmy Girardet wrote:
>> Each tool which wants to use pyproject.toml has to add a toml lib as a
>> conditional or hard dependency.
>>
>> Since toml is now the standard configuration file format,
Hi Jimmy, and welcome,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 09:10:40AM +0200, Jimmy Girardet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if this was already debated but I don't know how to search
> in the whole archive of the list.
>
>
> For now the adoption of pyproject.toml file is more difficult because
> toml is
Hi,
I don't know if this was already debated but I don't know how to search
in the whole archive of the list.
For now the adoption of pyproject.toml file is more difficult because
toml is not in the standard library.
Each tool which wants to use pyproject.toml has to add a toml lib as a
10 matches
Mail list logo
