Hello,
About LDTP:
Linux Desktop Testing Project is aimed at producing high quality test
automation framework (using GNOME / Python) and cutting-edge tools that can
be used to test Linux Desktop and improve it. It uses the Accessibility
libraries to poke through the application's user interface.
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au writes:
I think you're missing a word there. Relatively secure perhaps?
Yes, something like that, oops.
The problem is that most users will not be a little bit careful. They
will stick the password on a Post-it note on the side of the
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:37:00 -0800, Paul Rubin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au writes:
Sorry, I meant consistent with the rest of Python, which mostly uses
functions/methods and only rarely statements (e.g. del and import).
yield, assert, if/else, return, etc.
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au writes:
Without becoming a purely functional language, you won't get rid of all
statements.
Why not? GCC lets you use any statement in an expression:
#include stdio.h
main()
{
int i, x, p=0;
x = ({ for (i=1;
Tim Roberts t...@probo.com wrote:
it's not the most efficient way to automate applications
Sikuli doesn't seem that much different from Python in this way: it
may not be the most efficient use of the computer's time, but I dare
say it's significantly less demanding on the end user's.
I can see
* Print is now a function. Great, much improvement.
Actually not, IMHO. All it does is is to provide incompatibility.
What incompatibility are you exactly talking about?
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Aug 21 2009, 12:23:57)
[GCC 4.4.1 20090818 (Red Hat 4.4.1-6)] on linux2
Type help,
Hi,
I would like to parse a webpage to can get the url of the video download. I
use pyhton and firebug but I cant get the url link.
Example:
The url where I have to get the video link is:
http://www.rtve.es/mediateca/videos/20100125/saber-comer---salsa-verde-judiones-25-01-10/676590.shtml
The
2010/1/27 mierdatutis mi mmm...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I would like to parse a webpage to can get the url of the video download. I
use pyhton and firebug but I cant get the url link.
Example:
The url where I have to get the video link is:
Paul Rubin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au writes:
Without becoming a purely functional language, you won't get rid of all
statements.
Why not? GCC lets you use any statement in an expression:
#include stdio.h
main()
{
int i, x, p=0;
One thing I ofter wonder is which is better when you just need a
throwaway sequence: a list or a tuple? E.g.:
if foo in ['some', 'random', 'strings']:
...
if [bool1, bool2, boo3].count(True) != 1:
...
(The last one only works with tuples since python 2.6)
Is a list or tuple better or
Hi folks,
I was going to write this post for a while because all sorts of myths
periodically come up on this list about python 3. I don't think the
posters mean to spread false information on purpose, they simply are
not aware of the facts.
My list is surely incomplete, please feel free to post
Daniel Fetchinson, 27.01.2010 11:32:
1. Print statement/function creates incompatibility between 2.x and 3.x!
Certainly false or misleading, if one uses 2.6 and 3.x the
incompatibility is not there. Print as a function works in 2.6:
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Aug 21 2009, 12:23:57)
[GCC
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Daniel Fetchinson
fetchin...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I was going to write this post for a while because all sorts of myths
periodically come up on this list about python 3. I don't think the
posters mean to spread false information on purpose, they
On 25 jan, 23:30, Sean DiZazzo half.ital...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 24, 11:27 am, Rémi babedo...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would like to do a Python application that prints data to stdout, but
not the common way. I do not want the lines to be printed after each
other, but the
Those videos are generated by javascript.
There is some parser with python for javascript???
Thanks a lot!
2010/1/27 Simon Brunning si...@brunningonline.net
2010/1/27 mierdatutis mi mmm...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I would like to parse a webpage to can get the url of the video download.
I
use
Someone is badmouthing me, and it has been doing so over the years. I
feel obliged to post a off topic relpy. See:
• DreamHost.com and A Incidence of Harassment
http://xahlee.org/Periodic_dosage_dir/t2/harassment.html
• Why Can't You Be Normal?
2010/1/27 mierdatutis mi mmm...@gmail.com:
Those videos are generated by javascript.
There is some parser with python for javascript???
There is http://github.com/davisp/python-spidermonkey, but
simulating the whole context of a browser is going to be a horror.
You are probably far better off
Hello,
To accept cookies, use the HTTPCookieProcessor as explained here:
http://www.nomadjourney.com/2009/03/automatic-site-login-using-python-urllib2/
Best regards,
Javier
2010/1/27 Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Patrick whya...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm
Hello,
A test case for Windmill might also be used to extract the information
that you're looking for.
Best regards,
Javier
2010/1/27 mierdatutis mi mmm...@gmail.com:
Those videos are generated by javascript.
There is some parser with python for javascript???
Thanks a lot!
2010/1/27
Hello again,
What test case for Windmill? Can you say me the link, please?
Many thanks
2010/1/27 Javier Collado javier.coll...@gmail.com
Hello,
A test case for Windmill might also be used to extract the information
that you're looking for.
Best regards,
Javier
2010/1/27
2010/1/27 mierdatutis mi mmm...@gmail.com:
Hello again,
What test case for Windmill? Can you say me the link, please?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=windmill+test
--
Cheers,
Simon B.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jan 27, 10:20 am, Floris Bruynooghe floris.bruynoo...@gmail.com
wrote:
One thing I ofter wonder is which is better when you just need a
throwaway sequence: a list or a tuple? E.g.:
if foo in ['some', 'random', 'strings']:
...
if [bool1, bool2, boo3].count(True) != 1:
...
(The
On Jan 26, 3:47 pm, Xah Lee xah...@gmail.com wrote:
* Many functions that return lists now returns “Views” or
“Iterators” Instead. A fucking fuck all fucked up shit. A extraneous
“oop engineering” complication. (See: Lambda in Python 3000)
See also:
“Iterators: Signs of Weakness in
What are the arguments for choosing Python against Ruby
for introductory programming ? Python has no provisions
for tail recursion, Ruby is going to... So what ?
Thanks,
JG
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Jean Guillaume Pyraksos, 27.01.2010 14:01:
What are the arguments for choosing Python against Ruby
for introductory programming ?
PEP 20:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0020/
Stefan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
hello,
just for _curiosity_. What would be if i start a thread in a nother thread and
acquire a lock in the child thread. Is there anything that could go wrong
if someone try to start threads in threads?
Kind Regards,
Richi
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Richard Lamboj, 27.01.2010 14:06:
just for _curiosity_. What would be if i start a thread in a nother thread
and
acquire a lock in the child thread. Is there anything that could go wrong
if someone try to start threads in threads?
There's usually tons of things that can go wrong w.r.t.
2010/1/27 Jean Guillaume Pyraksos wis...@hotmail.com:
What are the arguments for choosing Python against Ruby
for introductory programming ?
Frankly, either would be a good choice.
I think Python is a little cleaner, but I'm sure you'd find Ruby fans
who'd argue the complete opposite. Both
Hello,
You can find some advice here:
http://www.packtpub.com/article/web-scraping-with-python-part-2
Best regards,
Javier
2010/1/27 mierdatutis mi mmm...@gmail.com:
Hello again,
What test case for Windmill? Can you say me the link, please?
Many thanks
2010/1/27 Javier Collado
* rantingrick:
On Jan 26, 10:52 pm, Alf P. Steinbach al...@start.no wrote:
* rantingrick:
On Jan 26, 9:38 pm, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 1/26/2010 7:54 PM, Chris Rebert wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Someone Somethingfordhai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I need a
Hi folks,
I was going to write this post for a while because all sorts of myths
periodically come up on this list about python 3. I don't think the
posters mean to spread false information on purpose, they simply are
not aware of the facts.
My list is surely incomplete, please feel free to
Am Wednesday 27 January 2010 14:10:13 schrieb Stefan Behnel:
Richard Lamboj, 27.01.2010 14:06:
just for _curiosity_. What would be if i start a thread in a nother
thread and acquire a lock in the child thread. Is there anything that
could go wrong if someone try to start threads in
1. Print statement/function creates incompatibility between 2.x and 3.x!
Certainly false or misleading, if one uses 2.6 and 3.x the
incompatibility is not there. Print as a function works in 2.6:
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Aug 21 2009, 12:23:57)
[GCC 4.4.1 20090818 (Red Hat 4.4.1-6)] on
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
Hi folks,
I was going to write this post for a while because all sorts of myths
periodically come up on this list about python 3. I don't think the
posters mean to spread false information on purpose, they simply are
not aware of the facts.
My list is surely
Richard Lamboj, 27.01.2010 15:23:
Am Wednesday 27 January 2010 14:10:13 schrieb Stefan Behnel:
Richard Lamboj, 27.01.2010 14:06:
just for _curiosity_. What would be if i start a thread in a nother
thread and acquire a lock in the child thread. Is there anything that
could go wrong if someone
def show(opened):
... with opened as file:
... for line in file:
... print line.strip()
...
show(open(test.txt))
blah1
blah2
blah3
#
# Good! I wonder if I can do that with StringIO ...
#
import StringIO
On 01/28/10 01:32, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
Hi folks,
I was going to write this post for a while because all sorts of myths
periodically come up on this list about python 3. I don't think the
posters mean to spread false information on purpose, they simply are
Iain King wrote:
On Jan 27, 10:20 am, Floris Bruynooghe floris.bruynoo...@gmail.com
wrote:
One thing I ofter wonder is which is better when you just need a
throwaway sequence: a list or a tuple? E.g.:
if foo in ['some', 'random', 'strings']:
...
if [bool1, bool2, boo3].count(True) !=
On Jan 26, 11:34 pm, Arnaud Delobelle arno...@googlemail.com wrote:
Steve Howell showel...@yahoo.com writes:
On Jan 25, 1:32 pm, Arnaud Delobelle arno...@googlemail.com wrote:
Steve Howell showel...@yahoo.com writes:
[...]
My algorithm does exactly N pops and roughly N list accesses,
On Jan 27, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Jean Guillaume Pyraksos wrote:
What are the arguments for choosing Python against Ruby
for introductory programming ? Python has no provisions
for tail recursion, Ruby is going to... So what ?
Thanks,
I think the main difference is in culture, especially for
* Daniel Fetchinson:
* Print is now a function. Great, much improvement.
Actually not, IMHO. All it does is is to provide incompatibility.
What incompatibility are you exactly talking about?
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Aug 21 2009, 12:23:57)
[GCC 4.4.1 20090818 (Red Hat 4.4.1-6)] on
On 27 Jan, 14:41, D HANNEY spam2...@nney.com wrote:
[...]
class NoGuardProxy(object):
... def __init__(self, t):
... self.t = t
... def __enter__(self):
... return self
... def __exit__(self, type, value, traceback):
...
Iain King wrote:
On Jan 27, 10:20 am, Floris Bruynooghe floris.bruynoo...@gmail.com
wrote:
One thing I ofter wonder is which is better when you just need a
throwaway sequence: a list or a tuple? E.g.:
if foo in ['some', 'random', 'strings']:
...
if [bool1, bool2, boo3].count(True) !=
I'm going to be starting some new Python projects in Python 2.6, but am
concerned that at least three of the libraries I will be
using--pycrypto, paramiko and feedparser--are not currently supported in
Python 3.x. The authors of these programs have not given any indication
that work is
* Print is now a function. Great, much improvement.
Actually not, IMHO. All it does is is to provide incompatibility.
What incompatibility are you exactly talking about?
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Aug 21 2009, 12:23:57)
[GCC 4.4.1 20090818 (Red Hat 4.4.1-6)] on linux2
Type help,
* Daniel Fetchinson:
* Print is now a function. Great, much improvement.
Actually not, IMHO. All it does is is to provide incompatibility.
What incompatibility are you exactly talking about?
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Aug 21 2009, 12:23:57)
[GCC 4.4.1 20090818 (Red Hat 4.4.1-6)] on linux2
Hello,
I then figured I would get a new copy of python and install it
on AIX. I downloaded python.2.5.5c2 from http://www.python.org. I did
the configure and make which posted many errors in the ctypes function
which I guess is the reason that is does not get include in the final
make.
I
On Jan 27, 8:42 am, Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/28/10 01:32, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
Hi folks,
I was going to write this post for a while because all sorts of myths
periodically come up on this list about python 3. I don't think the
posters
Xah Lee, 27.01.2010 00:47:
Any comment on this?
No, sorry. Not worth bothering.
Stefan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2010-01-27, Alf P. Steinbach al...@start.no wrote:
I'm responding to the original message by Xah Lee, which is
not carried by my Usenet provider.
A Usenet provider that doesn't carry messages from Xah Lee.
So... many... jokes.
--
Grant
--
Hello,
Thanks Javier,
But I think that the page embeds a viewer. Only the viewer knows the URL to
the FLV file itself. I can't see any direct correspondence between the
elements of the two URLs, I cant see a way to construct the FLV's URL from
the contents of that page :-(
I have to do
* Print is now a function. Great, much improvement.
Actually not, IMHO. All it does is is to provide incompatibility.
What incompatibility are you exactly talking about?
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Aug 21 2009, 12:23:57)
[GCC 4.4.1 20090818 (Red Hat 4.4.1-6)] on linux2
Type help,
Hi,
My sincere apologies if I am mailing in wrong list.
My mission:I have to develop GUI based tool on python and will be using
PyQT with qtdesigner. I am automating creation of test script for call flows
just by drawing them from tool.
Challenges: In this tool there will be a drawing
In article 9f3c3$4b605a65$4275d90a$30...@fuse.net,
Kevin Walzer k...@codebykevin.com wrote:
I'm going to be starting some new Python projects in Python 2.6, but am
concerned that at least three of the libraries I will be
using--pycrypto, paramiko and feedparser--are not currently supported in
In article 7xfx5sxbmw@ruckus.brouhaha.com,
Paul Rubin no.em...@nospam.invalid wrote:
From a security point of view, the concept
of password strength checking is pretty dubious. If you want secure
passwords, generate them from a random number source and assign them to
the users. Don't have
* Daniel Fetchinson:
* Print is now a function. Great, much improvement.
Actually not, IMHO. All it does is is to provide incompatibility.
What incompatibility are you exactly talking about?
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Aug 21 2009, 12:23:57)
[GCC 4.4.1 20090818 (Red Hat 4.4.1-6)] on linux2
Le Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:20:53 -0800, Floris Bruynooghe a écrit :
Is a list or tuple better or more efficient in these situations?
Tuples are faster to allocate (they are allocated in one single step) and
quite a bit smaller too.
In some situations, in Python 2.7 and 3.1, they can also be
Hello Guys,
I have a video and what I want is to extract only half of the screen of
it.By half screen i mean when i run the video i can say the left half(from
the monitor's screen) of the video and dump the right half.
Thanks
Aditya
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
[...]
The main problem with the incompatibility is for porting code, not for
writing code from scratch. It's also a problem wrt. learning the
language. And I see no good reason for it: print can't really do more,
or less, or more conveniently (rather, one has to write a
* Steve Holden:
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
[...]
The main problem with the incompatibility is for porting code, not for
writing code from scratch. It's also a problem wrt. learning the
language. And I see no good reason for it: print can't really do more,
or less, or more conveniently (rather, one
George Trojan george.tro...@noaa.gov writes:
Inspired by the 'Default path for files' thread I tried to use
sitecustomize in my code. What puzzles me is that the site.py's main()
is not executed. My sitecustomize.py is
def main():
print 'In Main()'
main()
and the test program is
On Jan 15, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com
After reading several web pages and mailing list threads, I've learned
that the webbrowser module does not really support opening local
files, even if I use a file:// URL designator. In most cases,
webbrowser.open() will indeed open
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
George Trojan george.tro...@noaa.gov writes:
Inspired by the 'Default path for files' thread I tried to use
sitecustomize in my code. What puzzles me is that the site.py's main()
is not executed. My sitecustomize.py is
def main():
print 'In Main()'
main()
and the
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
From my POV, your question would be precisely identical if you had
started your project when Python 2.3 was just released and wanted to
know if the libraries you selected would be available for Python 2.6.
I didn't realize 2.6 broke libraries that had worked
On 07:03 pm, no.em...@nospam.invalid wrote:
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
From my POV, your question would be precisely identical if you had
started your project when Python 2.3 was just released and wanted to
know if the libraries you selected would be available for Python 2.6.
I
On Jan 27, 2:03 pm, Paul Rubin no.em...@nospam.invalid wrote:
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
From my POV, your question would be precisely identical if you had
started your project when Python 2.3 was just released and wanted to
know if the libraries you selected would be available for
Hi,
Next Monday, February 1st, we will be having our first Pyowa meeting
of 2010! It will be held at the Marshall County Sheriff's Office and
start at 7 p.m. (barring inclement weather). I will be demoing some
software I created for our Sheriff's office and will talk about the
various modules
On 2010-01-27, Alf P. Steinbach al...@start.no wrote:
* Steve Holden:
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
[...]
The main problem with the incompatibility is for porting code, not for
writing code from scratch. It's also a problem wrt. learning the
language. And I see no good reason for it: print can't
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 18:52 +0100, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
* Steve Holden:
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
[...]
The main problem with the incompatibility is for porting code, not for
writing code from scratch. It's also a problem wrt. learning the
language. And I see no good reason for it:
Mallikarjun(ಮಲ್ಲಿಕಾರ್ಜುನ್) wrote:
Dear friends,
I am newbie to Python + pygtk + Glade and recently wrote a simple password
strength checker app.
Since this is my first app/program, can someone review my code (just over
150 lines) and help me improve my programming capabilities
Here's my
Kevin Walzer wrote:
I'm going to be starting some new Python projects in Python 2.6, but
am concerned that at least three of the libraries I will be
using--pycrypto, paramiko and feedparser--are not currently supported
in Python 3.x. The authors of these programs have not given any
indication
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Mitchell L Model mlm...@comcast.net wrote:
I had some discussions with the Python documentation writers that led to the
following note being included in the Python 3.1 library documentation for
webbrowser.open: Note that on some platforms, trying to open a
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
Hi folks,
I was going to write this post for a while because all sorts of myths
periodically come up on this list about python 3. I don't think the
posters mean to spread false information on purpose, they simply are
not aware of the facts.
My list is surely
On 2010-01-27, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
Arguably, Python 3 has been rejected by the market.
Let's just say that it hasn't yet been accepted by the market. ;)
Instead, there's now Python 2.6, Python 2.7, and Python 2.8.
Python 3 has turned into a debacle like Perl 6, now 10 years
Stefan Behnel wrote:
Richard Lamboj, 27.01.2010 15:23:
Am Wednesday 27 January 2010 14:10:13 schrieb Stefan Behnel:
Richard Lamboj, 27.01.2010 14:06:
just for _curiosity_. What would be if i start a thread in a nother
thread and acquire a lock in the child thread. Is there anything that
could
Kevin Walzer wrote:
I'm going to be starting some new Python projects in Python 2.6, but am
concerned that at least three of the libraries I will be
using--pycrypto, paramiko and feedparser--are not currently supported in
Python 3.x. The authors of these programs have not given any indication
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 12:56 -0800, John Nagle wrote:
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
Hi folks,
I was going to write this post for a while because all sorts of myths
periodically come up on this list about python 3. I don't think the
posters mean to spread false information on purpose, they
On Jan 27, 9:22 am, Daniel Fetchinson fetchin...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi folks,
I was going to write this post for a while because all sorts of myths
periodically come up on this list about python 3. I don't think the
posters mean to spread false information on purpose, they simply are
Hi Mark,
many thanks for your hints.
--- func.py --
import ctypes as c
# int func (int numVars, char **varNames, int *varTypes)
INT = c.c_int
PINT = c.POINTER(INT)
PCHAR = c.c_char_p
PPCHAR = c.POINTER(PCHAR)
func = c.CDLL('func').func
func.restype = None
John Nagle na...@animats.com writes:
Myths about Python 3:
1. Python 3 is supported by major Linux distributions.
FALSE - most distros are shipping with Python 2.4, or 2.5 at
best.
There's a big difference between “What list of versions of Python does
fooOS ship with?”
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:56 PM, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
Hi folks,
I was going to write this post for a while because all sorts of myths
periodically come up on this list about python 3. I don't think the
posters mean to spread false information on
John Nagle wrote:
1. Python 3 is supported by major Linux distributions.
FALSE - most distros are shipping with Python 2.4, or 2.5 at best.
You are wrong. Modern versions of Debian / Ubuntu are using Python 2.6.
My Ubuntu box has python3.0, too.
2. Python 3 is supported by multiple
Adam Tauno Williams awill...@opengroupware.us writes:
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 12:56 -0800, John Nagle wrote:
2. Python 3 is supported by multiple Python implementations.
FALSE - Only CPython supports 3.x. Iron Python, Unladen Swallow,
PyPy, and Jython have all stayed with 2.x
Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de writes:
John Nagle wrote:
1. Python 3 is supported by major Linux distributions.
FALSE - most distros are shipping with Python 2.4, or 2.5 at best.
You are wrong. Modern versions of Debian / Ubuntu are using Python
2.6.
Only if by “modern” you
* Adam Tauno Williams:
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 18:52 +0100, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
* Steve Holden:
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
[...]
The main problem with the incompatibility is for porting code, not for
writing code from scratch. It's also a problem wrt. learning the
language. And I see no good
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 16:25 -0500, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:56 PM, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
Give the package maintainers time to update. There were some pretty
big changes to the C API. Most of the major 3rd party packages like
numpy and MySQLdb have already
On Jan 27, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Mitchell L Model
mlm...@comcast.net wrote:
I had some discussions with the Python documentation writers that
led to the
following note being included in the Python 3.1 library
documentation for
On Jan 27, 12:56 pm, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
Arguably, Python 3 has been rejected by the market.
No it's not fathomably arguable, because there's no reasonable way
that Python 3 could have fully replaced Python 2 so quickly.
At best, you could reasonably argue there hasn't been
On 1/27/2010 12:32 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:20:53 -0800, Floris Bruynooghe a écrit :
Is a list or tuple better or more efficient in these situations?
Tuples are faster to allocate (they are allocated in one single step) and
quite a bit smaller too.
In some situations,
On 10:07 pm, pavlovevide...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 27, 12:56�pm, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
Arguably, Python 3 has been rejected by the market.
No it's not fathomably arguable, because there's no reasonable way
that Python 3 could have fully replaced Python 2 so quickly.
At best,
On 27 Jan, 23:00, Mitchell L Model mlm...@comcast.net wrote:
I suppose that since a file: URL is not, strictly speaking, on the
web, that it shouldn't be opened with a web browser.
But anything with a URL is (or should be regarded as being) on the
Web. It may not be anything more than a
I am trying to think of things to do with the turtle module
1) is there a way to determine the current screen pixel color?
This would not use the included turtle module, but you could use
the turtle module from the pygsear collection:
http://www.nongnu.org/pygsear/
It requires pygame, but
On Jan 27, 2:56 pm, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
Hi folks,
I was going to write this post for a while because all sorts of myths
periodically come up on this list about python 3. I don't think the
posters mean to spread false information on purpose, they
On 1/27/2010 3:56 PM, John Nagle wrote:
2. Python 3 is supported by multiple Python implementations.
FALSE - Only CPython supports 3.x. Iron Python, Unladen Swallow,
PyPy, and Jython have all stayed with 2.x versions of Python.
Actually, Unladen Swallow is now targeted at 3.1; its developers
On 1/27/2010 2:03 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
From my POV, your question would be precisely identical if you had
started your project when Python 2.3 was just released and wanted to
know if the libraries you selected would be available for Python 2.6.
I didn't
Xah Lee xah...@gmail.com writes:
Someone is badmouthing me, and it has been doing so over the years. I
feel obliged to post a off topic relpy. See:
• DreamHost.com and A Incidence of Harassment
http://xahlee.org/Periodic_dosage_dir/t2/harassment.html
Dreamhost is not the only ISP that has
On Jan 27, 5:47 am, Simon Brunning si...@brunningonline.net wrote:
I think Python is a little cleaner, but I'm sure you'd find Ruby fans
who'd argue the complete opposite.
Are you sure about that?
There's a lot of line noise in Ruby. How are you supposed to pronounce
@@? What about {|..| ...
On Jan 27, 6:56 am, Roald de Vries r...@roalddevries.nl wrote:
On Jan 27, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Jean Guillaume Pyraksos wrote:
What are the arguments for choosing Python against Ruby
for introductory programming?
I think the main difference is in culture, especially for
*introductory*
Hi folks,
I was going to write this post for a while because all sorts of myths
periodically come up on this list about python 3. I don't think the
posters mean to spread false information on purpose, they simply are
not aware of the facts.
My list is surely incomplete, please feel free to
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 16:25 -0500, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:56 PM, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
Hi folks,
I was going to write this post for a while because all sorts of myths
periodically come up on this list about python 3. I
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
