Looks to me like the problem with Perl 6 was that it was too
ambitious, wanting to fix all perceived problems with the language.
Python 3 is much more limited in scope: at its core its Python with
Unicode fixed and old junk removed.
Neil
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
Terry Reedy writes:
> And complex numbers, and probably some other things, cannot be sorted
> even in Python2. Universal sorting is a broken idea, so Python3 leaves
> it to you to say what *you* mean.
Okay. I guess I'd better figure out what that is, for this code base,
before porting it to Pyth
On Jan 29, 4:29 pm, "Stephen.Wu" <54wut...@gmail.com> wrote:
> str.find(targetStr)
> str.index(targetStr) with exception
> str.count(targetStr)
> targetStr in str
>
> which is the fastest way to check whether targetStr is in str?
It's generally a lot quicker to investigate this kind of question
yo
geremy condra wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, and completely off-topic, why has Perl 6 gone so badly?
>
> Too much like Perl.
I was going to suggest that it's probably due to the multitude of ways
to it could be done :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-li
On 1/28/2010 8:24 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Um, what ordering do you want?
The same ordering I'd get in Python 2; that is, determined by the types
of the elements.
The ordering has not been consistent across minor versions of Python 2:
And complex numbers, and probably some other things,
* Steve Holden:
While I am fully aware that premature optimization, etc., but I cannot
resist an appeal to efficiency if it finally kills off this idea that
"they took 'cmp()' away" is a bad thing.
Passing a cmp= argument to sort provides the interpreter with a function
that will be called eac
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:24:28 -0800 (PST), Joan Miller
> declaimed the following in
> gmane.comp.python.general:
>
> > On 28 ene, 19:16, Josh Holland wrote:
> > > On 2010-01-28, Joan Miller wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've to call to many func
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Steven D'Aprano <
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:21:05 -0800, Tim Roberts wrote:
>
>> Perl 6, on the other hand, is still fantasyware a decade after its
>> announcement. It is, for the most part, THE canonical example of the
>
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:36:27 -0800, vanam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For replacing string in the file, i have used the module File input for
> replacing the string in the file.
If you're processing a single file, using fileinput is overkill, and slow
as well. Here is a quick-and-dirty way of processi
Dennis Lee Bieber writes:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:24:28 -0800 (PST), Joan Miller:
> > On 28 ene, 19:16, Josh Holland wrote:
> > > Check the docs on os.system().
> > No. I've a function that uses subprocess to run commands on the same
> > shell and so substitute to bash scrips. But a script full
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:21:05 -0800, Tim Roberts wrote:
>
>> Perl 6, on the other hand, is still fantasyware a decade after its
>> announcement. It is, for the most part, THE canonical example of the
>> wrong way to conduct a development e
On 1/28/2010 6:47 PM, Paul Boddie wrote:
On 27 Jan, 13:26, Xah Lee wrote:
So, for practical reasons, i think a “key” parameter is fine. But
chopping off “cmp” is damaging. When your data structure is complex,
its order is not embedded in some “key”. Taking out “cmp” makes it
impossible to sort
Hi all,
For replacing string in the file, i have used the module File
input for replacing the string in the file.
For understanding and execution purpose, i have just included Python
as a string in the file and want it to be replaced to PYTHON.
Below are my queries and code: (Correct me if my un
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:26:43 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article <03720b25$0$1309$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com>,
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> In any case, while such a idiom works in code, it plays havoc with the
>> interactive interpreter:
>>
>> >>> while 1:
>> ..."pass"
>> ...
>> 'pass'
>
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:21:05 -0800, Tim Roberts wrote:
> Perl 6, on the other hand, is still fantasyware a decade after its
> announcement. It is, for the most part, THE canonical example of the
> wrong way to conduct a development effort.
Out of curiosity, and completely off-topic, why has Perl
Roy Smith wrote:
> I'm inclined to call it a docs bug that these keywords are not in the HTML
> index. Yes?
No. The indices don't list the named parameters for any other built-
in, so why would they for print()?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
John Nagle wrote:
>
>Arguably, Python 3 has been rejected by the market. Instead, there's
>now Python 2.6, Python 2.7, and Python 2.8. Python 3 has turned into
>a debacle like Perl 6, now 10 years old.
Although I happen to be one of the folks who are reluctant to switch to
Python 3, I have to s
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM, elsa wrote:
>choice = random.choice(range(1,sum([i[0] for i in myList])+1))
>
That's the line causing the problem. It's generating all of the numbers
between 1 and your sum, then picking one. Try the following instead, which
will pick a number between 1
On Jan 29, 12:21 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> "Comes to their senses"?
>
> There's nothing you can do with __cmp__ that you can't do better with
> rich comparisons, and plenty that rich comparisons can do that __cmp__ is
> utterly incapable of dealing with. __cmp__ is crippled since it can only
>
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:38:23 -0800, mdj wrote:
>
>> On Jan 29, 9:47 am, Paul Boddie wrote:
>>> On 27 Jan, 13:26, Xah Lee wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
So, for practical reasons, i think a “key” parameter is fine. But
chopping off “cmp” is damaging. When your data structur
Steve Holden wrote:
Dave Angel wrote:
elsa wrote:
Hi guys,
I've got a problem with my program, in that the code just takes too
long to run. Here's what I'm doing. If anyone has any tips, they'd be
much appreciated!
So, say I have a list of lists that looks something like this (I'm
usi
Roy Smith wrote:
> In article <03720b25$0$1309$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com>,
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> In any case, while such a idiom works in code, it plays havoc with the
>> interactive interpreter:
>>
> while 1:
>> ..."pass"
>> ...
>> 'pass'
>> 'pass'
>> 'pass'
>> 'pass'
>> 'pass
Steve Holden wrote:
> Dave Angel wrote:
>> elsa wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I've got a problem with my program, in that the code just takes too
>>> long to run. Here's what I'm doing. If anyone has any tips, they'd be
>>> much appreciated!
>>>
>>> So, say I have a list of lists that looks something
Terry Reedy wrote:
> This statement was to counter the 'myth' that US was only targeted at
> 2.x when the current situation is quite the opposite.
Not so much 'myth' as 'outdated information', they were very clear
that 2.x was the initial target.
> In particular, several people said that the spe
Joan Miller wrote:
> Does anybody knows any library to help me to avoid the use of the main
> quotes, and brackets?
> I would to use anything as:
> $ ls /home => run("ls /home")
It's not a library, but IPython[1] provides a lot of what you're
after:
IPython 0.9.1 -- An enhanced Interactive Pytho
In article ,
"Alf P. Steinbach" wrote:
> * Roy Smith:
> > In article ,
> > Mitchell L Model wrote:
> >
> >> I use the sep and end keywords all the time.
> >
> > What are 'sep' and 'end'? I'm looking in
> > http://docs.python.org/3.1/genindex-all.html and don't see those mentioned
> > at a
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:33:58 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>
>> Antoine Pitrou writes:
>>
>>> Le Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:19:24 +, Steven D'Aprano a écrit :
4. Python 3 will make you irresistible to women.
FALSE - Python 3 coders are no more likely to get a d
In article <03720b25$0$1309$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> In any case, while such a idiom works in code, it plays havoc with the
> interactive interpreter:
>
> >>> while 1:
> ..."pass"
> ...
> 'pass'
> 'pass'
> 'pass'
> 'pass'
> 'pass'
It's not particularly useful
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:38:23 -0800, mdj wrote:
> On Jan 29, 9:47 am, Paul Boddie wrote:
>> On 27 Jan, 13:26, Xah Lee wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > So, for practical reasons, i think a “key” parameter is fine. But
>> > chopping off “cmp” is damaging. When your data structure is complex,
>> > its order is
Dave Angel wrote:
> elsa wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I've got a problem with my program, in that the code just takes too
>> long to run. Here's what I'm doing. If anyone has any tips, they'd be
>> much appreciated!
>>
>> So, say I have a list of lists that looks something like this (I'm
>> using a lis
On Jan 29, 9:47 am, Paul Boddie wrote:
> On 27 Jan, 13:26, Xah Lee wrote:
>
>
>
> > So, for practical reasons, i think a “key” parameter is fine. But
> > chopping off “cmp” is damaging. When your data structure is complex,
> > its order is not embedded in some “key”. Taking out “cmp” makes it
> >
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:01:38 +0100, Roald de Vries wrote:
> Question out of general interest in the language: If I would want to
> generate such functions in a for-loop, what would I have to do? This
> doesn't work:
>
> class Move(object):
>def __call__(self, direction):
>
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:13:50 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Paul Rubin writes:
>
>> Ben Finney writes:
>> > So how should I be sorting a list with entries of “unequal types”
>> > such that it will work in Python 3?
>>
>> Um, what ordering do you want?
>
> The same ordering I'd get in Python 2; tha
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:33:58 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou writes:
>
>> Le Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:19:24 +, Steven D'Aprano a écrit :
>> > 4. Python 3 will make you irresistible to women.
>> >
>> > FALSE - Python 3 coders are no more likely to get a date than any
>> > other
if you're open to other libraries, this could be done extremely fast in
numpy.
On my machine summing that whole array takes 75ms.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Steven D'Aprano <
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:52:14 -0800, elsa wrote:
>
> > Now, what I ne
elsa wrote:
Hi guys,
I've got a problem with my program, in that the code just takes too
long to run. Here's what I'm doing. If anyone has any tips, they'd be
much appreciated!
So, say I have a list of lists that looks something like this (I'm
using a list of lists, rather than a list of tuples
Paul Rubin writes:
> Ben Finney writes:
> > So how should I be sorting a list with entries of “unequal types”
> > such that it will work in Python 3?
>
> Um, what ordering do you want?
The same ordering I'd get in Python 2; that is, determined by the types
of the elements.
Peter Otten <__pete
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:01:21 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> So how should I be sorting a list with entries of “unequal types” such
> that it will work in Python 3?
That depends on how you want the items to be sorted. Python 2.x sorted
unequal types in some arbitrary but consistent order. If that's a
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:52:14 -0800, elsa wrote:
> Now, what I need to do is randomly choose one myList[i], however the
> distribution of my random choice needs to be proportional to the values
> of myList[i][0]. So, for this list above, I'd have a much higher chance
> of choosing myList[0] than my
Ethan Furman wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
4. Python 3 will make you irresistible to women.
FALSE
What?!? Drat!!! Guess I'll have to learn Lisp... ;)
~Ethan~
Learn to say this fast, you'll impress the hell out of them:
Chaps with chapped lips lisp.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
Paul Rubin wrote:
Ben Finney writes:
So how should I be sorting a list with entries of “unequal types” such
that it will work in Python 3?
Um, what ordering do you want? Basically you have to write a custom key
function (they removed the option of writing a comparison function).
Maybe somet
Ben Finney wrote:
Howdy all,
Python 2.6 tells me that, in Python 3, sorting a list with entries of
incompatible types is not allowed:
=
$ python2.5 -c "foo = [1, True, 'green', 4, -27, 15.3]; foo.sort(); print foo;"
[-27, 1, True, 4, 15.301, 'green']
$ python2.6 -c "foo = [1, T
En Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:34:22 -0300, JohnnyFive
escribió:
I need help with something that is probably fairly simple, but i'm
having a heck of a time getting it work.
Basically, I need my program to sleep for a certain amount of time,
but I don't want the console to become unresponsive while s
On 1/28/2010 6:52 PM, elsa wrote:
Hi guys,
I've got a problem with my program, in that the code just takes too
long to run. Here's what I'm doing. If anyone has any tips, they'd be
much appreciated!
So, say I have a list of lists that looks something like this (I'm
using a list of lists, rather
elsa wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've got a problem with my program, in that the code just takes too
> long to run. Here's what I'm doing. If anyone has any tips, they'd be
> much appreciated!
>
> So, say I have a list of lists that looks something like this (I'm
> using a list of lists, rather than a
Ben Finney writes:
> So how should I be sorting a list with entries of “unequal types” such
> that it will work in Python 3?
Um, what ordering do you want? Basically you have to write a custom key
function (they removed the option of writing a comparison function).
Maybe something like
foo
Ben Finney wrote:
> Python 2.6 tells me that, in Python 3, sorting a list with entries of
> incompatible types is not allowed:
> $ python2.6 -3 -c "foo = [1, True, 'green', 4, -27, 15.3]; foo.sort();
> print foo;" -c:1: DeprecationWarning: comparing unequal types not
> supported in 3.x
> [-27, 1,
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> If you were designing your own language from scratch, so that backwards
> compatibility wasn't an issue, why would you make print a statement?
As another real estate analogy, my apartment has some problems with its
plumbing, plus an ugly spot on the kitchen wall that co
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:50:55 -0800, Jonathan Gardner wrote:
> I agree on "assert". I don't like running a program in test mode and
> then running it in production mode with different code. I would rather
> test what I am going to actually run. "assert" should be a function, and
> support for remov
In article ,
wrote:
>
>I need to create a python subprogress, like this:
>myProcess = subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, 'C:\myscript.py'],
> env=env, stdin=subprocess.PIPE,
> stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
You need to change yo
Howdy all,
Python 2.6 tells me that, in Python 3, sorting a list with entries of
incompatible types is not allowed:
=
$ python2.5 -c "foo = [1, True, 'green', 4, -27, 15.3]; foo.sort(); print foo;"
[-27, 1, True, 4, 15.301, 'green']
$ python2.6 -c "foo = [1, True, 'green', 4, -27
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:37:56 +0100, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
> * Lie Ryan:
>> On 01/28/10 20:12, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
>>> >>> import builtins
>>> >>>
>>> >>> org_print = print
>>> >>> builtins.print = 666
>>> >>>
>>> >>> print( "trallala" )
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>
Hi guys,
I've got a problem with my program, in that the code just takes too
long to run. Here's what I'm doing. If anyone has any tips, they'd be
much appreciated!
So, say I have a list of lists that looks something like this (I'm
using a list of lists, rather than a list of tuples, as I need it
On Jan 28, 11:35 am, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > 4. Python 3 will make you irresistible to women.
>
> > FALSE
>
> What?!? Drat!!! Guess I'll have to learn Lisp... ;)
Irresisible? Ha! The chicks will think you have a harelip.
>
> ~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.org/mai
On 27 Jan, 13:26, Xah Lee wrote:
>
> So, for practical reasons, i think a “key” parameter is fine. But
> chopping off “cmp” is damaging. When your data structure is complex,
> its order is not embedded in some “key”. Taking out “cmp” makes it
> impossible to sort your data structure.
What would a
On Jan 28, 2:16 pm, Joan Miller wrote:
>
> There would be to make a function for each system command to use so it
> would be too inefficient, and follow the problem with the quotes.
>
> The best is make a parser into a compiled language
>
Yeah, you could do that. Or you can simply rely on /bin/sh
I need help with something that is probably fairly simple, but i'm
having a heck of a time getting it work.
Basically, I need my program to sleep for a certain amount of time,
but I don't want the console to become unresponsive while sleeping.
As soon as the time is up, I want the main program to
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:20:02 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 1/28/2010 3:37 AM, Paul Rubin wrote:
>> Jonathan Gardner writes:
>>> If you're going to have statements, you're going to need the null
>>> statement. That's "pass".
>>
>> Why? Expressions are statements, so you could just say "pass" (in
On 1/28/2010 3:45 PM, Joan Miller wrote:
On 28 ene, 20:34, Joan Miller wrote:
On 28 ene, 20:20, Peter wrote:
On Jan 29, 6:58 am, John Posner wrote:
On 1/28/2010 2:24 PM, Joan Miller wrote:
On 28 ene, 19:16, Josh Hollandwrote:
On 2010-01-28, Joan Millerwrote:
I've to call t
On 28 ene, 21:40, Jonathan Gardner
wrote:
> On Jan 28, 10:20 am, Joan Miller wrote:
>
>
>
> > I've to call to many functions with the format:
>
> > >>> run("cmd")
>
> > were "cmd" is a command with its arguments to pass them to the shell
> > and run it, i.e.
>
> > >>> run("pwd")
> > or
> > >>> r
* Duncan Booth:
"Alf P. Steinbach" wrote:
I'm not sure I like your idea of introducing static typing to increase
speed, but it could be done without introducing new syntax simply by
defining a special meaning to such annotation expressions that are
'type' invocations, say, then like
def
On Jan 28, 12:53 pm, "PS.OHM" wrote:
> Hello Guys
>
> I have get some error when i install MySQLdb on Mac OS X
>
> after i key command $python setup.py build
>
> rusult is
> :
> :
> error: command 'gcc-4.0' failed with exit status 1
>
> How to config this poblem?
Please show a little bit more of
On Jan 28, 2010, at 1:40 PM, Terry Reedy wrote
...
On 1/28/2010 11:03 AM, Mitchell L Model wrote:
I have been working with Python 3 for over a year. ...
I agree completely.
Such sweet words to read!
Conversion of old code is greatly facilitied by the 2to3 tool that
comes
with Pyth
nn writes:
> After posting I was thinking I should have posted a more
> straightforward version like the one you wrote. Now there is! It
> probably is more efficient too. I just have a tendency to think in
> terms of pipes: "pipe this junk in here, then in here, get output".
> Probably damage from
"Alf P. Steinbach" wrote:
> I'm not sure I like your idea of introducing static typing to increase
> speed, but it could be done without introducing new syntax simply by
> defining a special meaning to such annotation expressions that are
> 'type' invocations, say, then like
>
>def speed( d
Big Stu writes:
> I'm hoping someone on here can point me to an example of a python
> package that is a great example of how to put it all together. I'm
> hoping for example code that demonstrates [good adherence to style and
> practice conventions]
I find the code base for Bazaar to be particu
On Jan 28, 2010, at 12:00 PM, python-list-requ...@python.org wrote:
From: Roy Smith
Date: January 28, 2010 11:09:58 AM EST
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: python 3's adoption
In article ,
Mitchell L Model wrote:
I use the sep and end keywords all the time.
What are 'sep' and 'en
* Yingjie Lan:
[snip]
def speed(float dist, float time):
return dist/time
then the compiler would generate code to first check parameter types
(or even do some casts if appropriate, say cast an int into float) in
the beginning of this function. and the rest of the function would then
be com
Josh Holland writes:
> On 2010-01-28, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> > Have you actually looked at any of the standard library?
> Not recently or in depth, no. I would have thought that it would be of
> high quality. I must have been mistaken.
Style conventions were introduced relatively la
On Jan 28, 10:20 am, Joan Miller wrote:
> I've to call to many functions with the format:
>
> >>> run("cmd")
>
> were "cmd" is a command with its arguments to pass them to the shell
> and run it, i.e.
>
>
>
> >>> run("pwd")
> or
> >>> run("ls /home")
>
> Does anybody knows any library to help me
Yingjie Lan wrote:
> We all know that Python is dynamically typed, and dynamically typed languages
> are generally slower than statically typed ones. I wonder if it is possible
> at all for Python to mix statically-typed-ness with dynamically-typed-ness to
> boost up its speed a little bit, espe
Antoine Pitrou writes:
> Le Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:19:24 +, Steven D'Aprano a écrit :
> > 4. Python 3 will make you irresistible to women.
> >
> > FALSE - Python 3 coders are no more likely to get a date than
> > any other programmer.
>
> They spend less time coding, so they /can/ get m
Am 28.01.10 22:12, schrieb Yingjie Lan:
We all know that Python is dynamically typed, and dynamically typed languages
are generally slower than statically typed ones. I wonder if it is possible at
all for Python to mix statically-typed-ness with dynamically-typed-ness to
boost up its speed a l
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
4. Python 3 will make you irresistible to women.
FALSE
What?!? Drat!!! Guess I'll have to learn Lisp... ;)
~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> nn writes:
>
> > On Jan 28, 10:50 am, evilweasel wrote:
> >> I will make my question a little more clearer. I have close to 60,000
> >> lines of the data similar to the one I posted. There are various
> >> numbers next to the sequence (this is basically the number of t
On 1/28/2010 2:51 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
Carl Banks wrote:
Regardless of how magnaminous the people of PSF are, the unfortunate
reality is that trademark owners are forced by the law to be
"particularly petty". PSF's IP lawyer will advise not to allow
unsanctioned fork of Python 2.7 to call
We all know that Python is dynamically typed, and dynamically typed languages
are generally slower than statically typed ones. I wonder if it is possible at
all for Python to mix statically-typed-ness with dynamically-typed-ness to
boost up its speed a little bit, especially when speed is needed
On 28 ene, 20:34, Joan Miller wrote:
> On 28 ene, 20:20, Peter wrote:
>
> > On Jan 29, 6:58 am, John Posner wrote:
>
> > > On 1/28/2010 2:24 PM, Joan Miller wrote:
>
> > > > On 28 ene, 19:16, Josh Holland wrote:
> > > >> On 2010-01-28, Joan Miller wrote:
>
> > > >>> I've to call to many functi
On 28 ene, 20:20, Peter wrote:
> On Jan 29, 6:58 am, John Posner wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 1/28/2010 2:24 PM, Joan Miller wrote:
>
> > > On 28 ene, 19:16, Josh Holland wrote:
> > >> On 2010-01-28, Joan Miller wrote:
>
> > >>> I've to call to many functions with the format:
>
> > >> run("cmd")
>
>
Ray Holt wrote:
Why am I getting the following error message. Area has been declared as
an attribute of Circle. Thanks, Ray
class Circle:
def __init__(self):
self.radius = 1
def area(self):
return self.radius * self.radius * 3.14159
c = Circle()
c.radius = 3
print c.area()
Ray Holt wrote:
> Why am I getting the following error message. Area has been declared as
> an attribute of Circle. Thanks, Ray
>
>
> class Circle:
> def __init__(self):
> self.radius = 1
> def area(self):
> return self.radius * self.radius * 3.14159
> c = Circle()
> c.radius = 3
>
On Jan 29, 6:58 am, John Posner wrote:
> On 1/28/2010 2:24 PM, Joan Miller wrote:
>
> > On 28 ene, 19:16, Josh Holland wrote:
> >> On 2010-01-28, Joan Miller wrote:
>
> >>> I've to call to many functions with the format:
>
> >> run("cmd")
>
> >> Check the docs on os.system().
> > No. I've a
On Jan 28, 12:13 pm, Joan Miller wrote:
> On 28 ene, 19:58, John Posner wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 1/28/2010 2:24 PM, Joan Miller wrote:
>
> > > On 28 ene, 19:16, Josh Holland wrote:
> > >> On 2010-01-28, Joan Miller wrote:
>
> > >>> I've to call to many functions with the format:
>
> > >> run("cm
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Ray Holt wrote:
> Why am I getting the following error message. Area has been declared as an
> attribute of Circle. Thanks, Ray
>
> class Circle:
> def __init__(self):
> self.radius = 1
> def area(self):
> return self.radius * self.radius * 3.14159
>
On 28 ene, 19:58, John Posner wrote:
> On 1/28/2010 2:24 PM, Joan Miller wrote:
>
> > On 28 ene, 19:16, Josh Holland wrote:
> >> On 2010-01-28, Joan Miller wrote:
>
> >>> I've to call to many functions with the format:
>
> >> run("cmd")
>
> >> Check the docs on os.system().
> > No. I've a fu
On 07:49 pm, stu.dohe...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you actually looked at any of the standard library?
Jean-Paul
I'm looking at urllib2 right now and it is covering a bunch of the
bases I'm looking for. And grepping in the /usr/lib/python2.5/ folder
for import statements on various things I'm i
On 28 ene, 19:54, Steve Holden wrote:
> Joan Miller wrote:
> > On 28 ene, 19:16, Josh Holland wrote:
> >> On 2010-01-28, Joan Miller wrote:
>
> >>> I've to call to many functions with the format:
> >> run("cmd")
> >> Check the docs on os.system().
> > No. I've a function that uses subprocess
On 1/28/2010 2:24 PM, Joan Miller wrote:
On 28 ene, 19:16, Josh Holland wrote:
On 2010-01-28, Joan Miller wrote:
I've to call to many functions with the format:
run("cmd")
Check the docs on os.system().
No. I've a function that uses subprocess to run commands on the same
shell and so s
Steven Howe wrote:
On 01/28/2010 09:49 AM, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
evilweasel wrote:
I will make my question a little more clearer. I have close to 60,000
lines of the data similar to the one I posted. There are various
numbers next to the sequence (this is basically the number of times
th
Why am I getting the following error message. Area has been declared as an
attribute of Circle. Thanks, Ray
class Circle:
def __init__(self):
self.radius = 1
def area(self):
return self.radius * self.radius * 3.14159
c = Circle()
c.radius = 3
print c.area()
Traceback (most rece
Joan Miller wrote:
> On 28 ene, 19:16, Josh Holland wrote:
>> On 2010-01-28, Joan Miller wrote:
>>
>>> I've to call to many functions with the format:
>> run("cmd")
>> Check the docs on os.system().
> No. I've a function that uses subprocess to run commands on the same
> shell and so substitu
Carl Banks wrote:
> On Jan 28, 8:10 am, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
>> In article ,
>> Neil Hodgson wrote:
>>
>>> Carl Banks:
There is also no hope someone will fork Python 2.x and continue it in
perpetuity. Well, someone might try to fork it, but they won't be
able to call
> Have you actually looked at any of the standard library?
>
> Jean-Paul
I'm looking at urllib2 right now and it is covering a bunch of the
bases I'm looking for. And grepping in the /usr/lib/python2.5/ folder
for import statements on various things I'm interested in is bringing
up some good exa
On 2010-01-28, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> Have you actually looked at any of the standard library?
Not recently or in depth, no. I would have thought that it would be of
high quality. I must have been mistaken.
--
Josh "dutchie" Holland
http://www.joshh.co.uk/
http://twitter.com/jshholl
On 28 ene, 19:17, Big Stu wrote:
> I'm hoping someone on here can point me to an example of a python
> package that is a great example of how to put it all together. I'm
> hoping for example code that demonstrates:
>
> -Strict adherence to PEP 8
> -thorough use of Docstrings
> -Conventional direc
On Jan 28, 2:28 pm, Josh Holland wrote:
> On 2010-01-28, Big Stu wrote:
>
> > I'm hoping someone on here can point me to an example of a python
> > package that is a great example of how to put it all together. I'm
> > hoping for example code that demonstrates:
>
> Surely most of the Standard Li
On 07:28 pm, j...@joshh.co.uk wrote:
On 2010-01-28, Big Stu wrote:
I'm hoping someone on here can point me to an example of a python
package that is a great example of how to put it all together. I'm
hoping for example code that demonstrates:
Surely most of the Standard Library should satisf
On 2010-01-28 17:03, Mitchell L Model wrote:
I have been working with Python 3 for over a year. I used it in writing
my book "Bioinformatics Programming Using Python"
(http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596154509).
That book sounds very interesting, even though I am more interested in
the bioinfor
On 2010-01-28, Big Stu wrote:
> I'm hoping someone on here can point me to an example of a python
> package that is a great example of how to put it all together. I'm
> hoping for example code that demonstrates:
Surely most of the Standard Library should satisfy all your
requirements?
--
Josh
On 28 ene, 19:16, Josh Holland wrote:
> On 2010-01-28, Joan Miller wrote:
>
> > I've to call to many functions with the format:
>
> run("cmd")
>
> Check the docs on os.system().
No. I've a function that uses subprocess to run commands on the same
shell and so substitute to bash scrips. But a
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
