Hi Everyone,
A reminder that Early Bird Registrations for PyCon Australia 2011 will
be closing soon. There are only a few days left to get your tickets at
the discounted rate.
PyCon Australia is Australia's only conference dedicated exclusively to
the Python programming language, and will be
tox 1.0: the rapid multi-python test automation
===
I am happy to announce tox 1.0, a stabilization and maintenance release
with some small improvements. tox automates tedious test activities
driven from a simple ``tox.ini``
On May 20, 12:00 am, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard J.deBoynePollard-
newsgro...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Indeed. And the algorithms that are employed to perform the operations
so described are recursive.
Actually, they almost never are. Iterative algorithms are almost
always used to avoid a stack
On Fri, 27 May 2011 15:40:53 -0500, harrismh777 wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Would you care to revise your claims?
No.
You have erected a straw-man... once again.
You keep using that term, but it is clear to me that you don't have the
foggiest idea of what the straw-man fallacy is.
* Thomas Rachel (Sat, 28 May 2011 07:06:53 +0200)
Am 27.05.2011 17:52 schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 09:40:53 -0500, harrismh777 wrote:
3.x is completely incompatible with 2.x (some call it a dialect,
but that is a lie).
Completely incompatible? A lie?
Hard word, but it
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Thorsten Kampe
thors...@thorstenkampe.de wrote:
The question is: if you want (or have) to run your code under Python3,
how likely is that it will run unmodified? My experience is: unless the
code is especially written with Python3 compatability or just a short
* Thorsten Kampe (Sat, 28 May 2011 08:38:54 +0200)
My experience is: unless the code is especially written with Python3
compatability [...]
Oops, I meant unless the code is specifically written with Python3
compatability in mind [...]
Thorsten
--
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 14:25 -0700, suresh wrote:
I want to execute the following command line stuff from inside python.
$cd directory
$./executable
I tried the following but I get errors
import subprocess
subprocess.check_call('cd dir_name;./executable')
Due to
On Sat, 28 May 2011 08:38:54 +0200, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
* Thomas Rachel (Sat, 28 May 2011 07:06:53 +0200)
Am 27.05.2011 17:52 schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 09:40:53 -0500, harrismh777 wrote:
3.x is completely incompatible with 2.x (some call it a dialect, but
that is a
Grant Edwards wrote:
After hearing/reading somebody for years, I don't seem to have a
detailed image of them in my head, but when I finally do see a picture
of them, my initial reaction is almost always no, that's not at all
what I thought he/she looked like.
It works the other way, too. I've
Daniel Kluev dan.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
test.py:
from threading import Thread
class X(object):
pass
obj = X()
obj.x = 0
def f(*args):
for i in range(1):
obj.x += 1
threads = []
for i in range(100):
t = Thread(target=f)
threads.append(t)
t.start()
for
Daniel Kluev wrote:
So I'd like to know: how do these other implementations handle
concurrency matters for their primitive types, and prevent them from
getting corrupted in multithreaded programs (if they do) ? I'm not only
thinking about python types, but also primitive containers and types
On Samstag 28 Mai 2011, Marc Christiansen wrote:
And I wouldn't rely on 3.2
not to break.
it breaks too like it should, but only rarely
like one out of 10 times
i5:/pub/src/gitgames/kajongg/src$ python3.2 test.py
100
i5:/pub/src/gitgames/kajongg/src$ python3.2 test.py
100
On 26-May-11 07:48 AM, truongxuan quang wrote:
Hello list,
I am installing and testing istSOS wrote base on Python with its
extension like gdal, isodate, easy istall, setuptool, psycopg. I have
already installed all these stuff when I was using method POST the error
appear is _No module named
On May 23, 11:30 pm, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 23, 5:30 am, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:39:33 -0700, Tim Roberts wrote:
Stef Mientki stef.mien...@gmail.com wrote:
must of us will not use single bits these days, but
On Sat, 28 May 2011 07:06:53 +0200
Thomas Rachel
nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa...@spamschutz.glglgl.de
wrote:
Completely incompatible? A lie?
Hard word, but it is true. Many things can and will fall on your feet
when moving.
There are very many subtle differences.
The space
In article
fbd69b90-b709-48ed-a247-af943ddbc...@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com
,
Carl Banks pavlovevide...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, May 27, 2011 6:47:21 AM UTC-7, Roy Smith wrote:
One of the truly awesome things about the Python re library is that it
lets you write complex regexes
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:27 PM, bch bch.itbgcth...@gmail.com wrote:
And of course, a programmer cannot tell the difference between
Halloween and Christmas day.
Well known, of course. But a lot of modern programmers don't speak
octal, they only use another power-of-two base; it's as though
On 27-5-2011 19:53, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-05-27, Irmen de Jong ir...@-nospam-xs4all.nl wrote:
On 27-05-11 15:54, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-05-27, Ben Finneyben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Richard Parkerr.richardpar...@comcast.net writes:
On May 26, 2011, at 4:28 AM,
Irmen,
I'm going to share this thread, and the funny slideshow about Uncomment your
code, with my team at work :-) We're not a Python shop so I'm probably the
only one reading this
Same here!
but as usual there is a lot of wisdom going on in this new[s]group that is
not only applicable
On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:39:33 -0700, Tim Roberts wrote:
That IS funny. Interesting how a careful choice of arugments will fool us.
One of my favorite math jokes is like that. A teacher asked a student to
reduce the following fraction:
16
64
He says all I have to do is cancel
http://123maza.com/65/Cape201/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article irooea$kio$2...@reader1.panix.com,
Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
When trying to find a bug in code written by sombody else, I often
first go through and delete all of the comments so as not to be
mislead.
I've heard people say that before. While I get the concept,
http://123maza.com/65/Cape201/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi Everyone,
A reminder that Early Bird Registrations for PyCon Australia 2011 will
be closing soon. There are only a few days left to get your tickets at
the discounted rate.
PyCon Australia is Australia's only conference dedicated exclusively to
the Python programming language, and will be
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
def foo():
Raise IndexError. This is useful as a testing fixture.
l = [1, 2, 3]
return l[3]
A quite useful thing, on occasion. I have a couple of variants of
this, actually. In one of my C++ programs:
extern char
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Nobody nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
Not Python, but:
#define SIX 1 + 5
#define NINE 8 + 1
...
printf(six times nine is: %d\n, SIX * NINE);
*AWESOME*!! That is brilliant!
DNA FTW.
ChrisA
--
On 28-5-2011 15:36, Roy Smith wrote:
In article irooea$kio$2...@reader1.panix.com,
Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
When trying to find a bug in code written by sombody else, I often
first go through and delete all of the comments so as not to be
mislead.
I've heard people
Hello.
I'm looking into subprocess.Popen docs.
I've launch the program with its arguments and that's smooth. I'm expecting
to read the output by *comunicate()* at every line that prgram may blow
during the process, but the output is given only when the child process is
ended.
I'd like to
On 5/27/2011 7:06 PM, Daniel Kluev wrote:
So I'd like to know: how do these other implementations handle concurrency
matters for their primitive types, and prevent them from getting corrupted
in multithreaded programs (if they do) ? I'm not only thinking about python
types, but also primitive
On Sat, 28 May 2011 09:39:08 -0700, John Nagle wrote:
Python allows patching code while the code is executing.
Can you give an example of what you mean by this?
If I have a function:
def f(a, b):
c = a + b
d = c*3
return hello world*d
how would I patch this function while it is
On May 27, 5:33 pm, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Lew Schwartz wrote:
So, if I read between the lines correctly, you recommend Python 3? Does
the windows version install with a development environment?
Dabo, last I checked, uses wxPython, which uses wxWidgets (sp?), which
is not
Ethan Furman wrote:
Um -- how can you have on the one hand completely not compatible and
on the other code that can cross-execute on either version?
Great question ! .. .it has to do with education.
... if you learn 2.x (only) and attempt to program on the 3.x platform,
(without helps,
On 2011-05-25, Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
I know many people who have no idea what a directory is, let alone a
subdirectory, unless it's the phone directory. They're non-computer
users. Once they start using computers, they quickly work out what the
word
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 5:21 AM, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net wrote:
The problem is that they look similar. :)
C looks like every other bracey language in the world. Is that a
problem? According to Wikipedia, there's quite a lot of them:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Rikishi42 skunkwo...@rikishi42.net wrote:
Is it [the term 'incinerate'] that widespread? I figured most people
woul speak of burning. OK, my bad if it is.
I think it's geographic. This list covers a lot of geography; I'm in
Australia, there are quite a few
David Beazley wrote a class decorator blog post that is worth reading:
http://dabeaz.blogspot.com/2011/05/class-decorators-might-also-be-super.html
Raymond
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op zaterdag 28 mei 2011 schreef Mark:
This is a bug in distutils/bdist_wininst - I just created
http://bugs.python.org/issue12200 with the details and your samples, and
sadly I can't think of a work around you can use until this is fixed
(which I might get to soon, but not this weekend...)
The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their right names. - Chinese
Proverb (So I'm told at least, I'd check with the Chinese first though ;)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 7:25 AM, GSO gso...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their right names. - Chinese
Proverb (So I'm told at least, I'd check with the Chinese first though ;)
See, I thought it was The fear of the Lord is the beginning of
wisdom, but the
On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 09:41 +0200, Peter Otten wrote:
You don't want to do this because cd is a built-in shell command,
and
subprocess does not execute within a shell (by default).
The problem is not that cd is built-in, but that there is no shell at
all.
You can change that with
On 5/28/2011 2:57 PM, Uncle Ben wrote:
Just this past Tuesday, I blindly downloaded 3.1 and found that at the
level I am workloing, all it took to get my 2.7 code to run was to put
parens around the print arguments and double the slashes in integer
division. I didn't even use the 2to3
On Sun, 29 May 2011 00:01:56 +0800, TheSaint wrote:
I'm looking into subprocess.Popen docs. I've launch the program with its
arguments and that's smooth. I'm expecting to read the output by
*comunicate()* at every line that prgram may blow during the process, but
the output is given only when
Ben Finney b...@benfinney.id.au wrote in
news:87k4deaxfc@benfinney.id.au:
Howdy all,
Python's standard library has modules for configuration file
parsing (configparser) and command-line argument parsing
(optparse, argparse). I want to write a program that does both,
but also:
*
Hi,
I'm looking for a portable way (windows XP / Windows Vista and Linux )
to send a signal from any python script to another one
(one signa would be enough)
I have several python scripts started from different parent processes
occasionally some of the scripts want to tell another to reread
TheSaint nob...@nowhere.net.no wrote:
I'm looking into subprocess.Popen docs.
I've launch the program with its arguments and that's smooth. I'm expecting
to read the output by *comunicate()* at every line that prgram may blow
during the process, but the output is given only when the child
Here's a curiosity. float(nan) can occur multiple times in a set or as
a key in a dict:
{float(nan), float(nan)}
{nan, nan}
except that sometimes it can't:
nan = float(nan)
{nan, nan}
{nan}
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
MRAB wrote:
Here's a curiosity. float(nan) can occur multiple times in a set or as
a key in a dict:
{float(nan), float(nan)}
{nan, nan}
except that sometimes it can't:
nan = float(nan)
{nan, nan}
{nan}
It's fundamentally because NaN is not equal to itself, by design.
Dictionaries
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 00:41 +0100, MRAB wrote:
Here's a curiosity. float(nan) can occur multiple times in a set or as
a key in a dict:
{float(nan), float(nan)}
{nan, nan}
These two nans are not equal (they are two different nans)
except that sometimes it can't:
nan = float(nan)
On 29 May 2011 10:16, Erik Max Francis m...@alcyone.com wrote:
MRAB wrote:
Here's a curiosity. float(nan) can occur multiple times in a set or as a
key in a dict:
{float(nan), float(nan)}
{nan, nan}
except that sometimes it can't:
nan = float(nan)
{nan, nan}
{nan}
It's
On Sun, 29 May 2011 00:41:16 +0100, MRAB wrote:
Here's a curiosity. float(nan) can occur multiple times in a set or as
a key in a dict:
{float(nan), float(nan)}
{nan, nan}
That's an implementation detail. Python is free to reuse the same object
when you create an immutable object twice
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org wrote:
This is the same nan, so it is equal to itself.
Actually, they're not. But it's possible the dictionary uses an 'is'
check to save computation, and if one thing 'is' another, it is
assumed to equal it. That's true of
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Tim Roberts t...@probo.com wrote:
TheSaint nob...@nowhere.net.no wrote:
I'm looking into subprocess.Popen docs.
I've launch the program with its arguments and that's smooth. I'm
expecting
to read the output by *comunicate()* at every line that prgram may
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 00:41 +0100, MRAB wrote:
1.0 == 1.0
True
float(nan) == float(nan)
False
I can't cite this in a spec, but it makes sense (to me) that two things
which are nan are not necessarily the same nan.
It's part of the IEEE standard.
--
Erik Max Francis
Irmen de Jong wrote:
I don't see how that is opposed to what Grant was saying. It's that these
'contracts'
tend to change and that people forget or are too lazy to update the comments to
reflect
those changes.
However, I can't see that deleting the comment documenting the
contract can be
On Sun, 29 May 2011 05:58:01 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
Geeks tend to have larger vocabularies than non-geeks, on average;
probably akin to our love of word games and precision (two distinct
notions that bridge surprisingly often).
And also because more educated people in general tend to
MRAB wrote:
float(nan) can occur multiple times in a set or as
a key in a dict:
{float(nan), float(nan)}
{nan, nan}
except that sometimes it can't:
nan = float(nan)
{nan, nan}
{nan}
NaNs are weird. They're not equal to themselves:
Python 2.7 (r27:82500, Oct 15 2010, 21:14:33)
[GCC
Gregory Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz writes:
If the contract comment doesn't match what code does, then there are
two possibilities -- the comment is wrong, or the code is wrong. The
appropriate response is to find out which one is wrong and fix it.
You omit the common third possibility:
On 29-5-2011 2:47, Gregory Ewing wrote:
Irmen de Jong wrote:
I don't see how that is opposed to what Grant was saying. It's that these
'contracts'
tend to change and that people forget or are too lazy to update the comments
to reflect
those changes.
However, I can't see that deleting
Chris Angelico wrote:
Both versions of Python are
the same language, because they think the same way;
I appreciate your thought. And there is an obvious continuity in
philosophy between 2.x and 3.x; in fact even a cursory study of the
history of python demonstrates a concerted effort to
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:02 PM, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
Both versions of Python are
the same language, because they think the same way;
I see your point. But, knowing that 3.x thinks like 2.x is not helpful
when we all know that languages don't
On 2011-05-29, Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 00:41 +0100, MRAB wrote:
Here's a curiosity. float(nan) can occur multiple times in a set or as
a key in a dict:
{float(nan), float(nan)}
{nan, nan}
These two nans are not equal (they are two different
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
A straw man is not when somebody points out holes in your argument, or
unwanted implications that you didn't realise were there. It is when
somebody makes claims on your behalf that you did not make to discredit
you, not because you don't understand the implications of
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 23:40, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net wrote:
You have erected a straw-man... once again.
I think that is a red herring, not a strawman.
Most 2.x code *will not* run correctly in 3.x/ Most of the best
improvements and enhancements of 3.x will not back-port to
Stefan Behnel sco...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
I don't see this having much to do with the DRY principle. It's explicit is
better than implicit and better safe than sorry that applies here.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
I recommend to revert this change. It seems that some users are opposed to any
kind of folding (as my earlier folding experiment has demonstrated); users who
*really* don't want to see the history would need to step forward and request a
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
--
Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg137107
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8583
___
Changes by Santoso Wijaya santoso.wij...@gmail.com:
--
components: +Interpreter Core
versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12163
___
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset ecf0ef85c72a by Ned Deily in branch '2.7':
Issue #9670: Increase the default stack size for secondary threads on
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ecf0ef85c72a
New changeset 0cded2f2cea3 by Ned Deily in branch '3.1':
Issue #9670:
Ned Deily n...@acm.org added the comment:
Version 4 looks good and the tests pass on OS X with pydebug enabled. Applied
in 2.7 (for release in 2.7.2), 3.1 (for 3.1.4). 3.2 (for 3.2.1), and default
(for 3.3).
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status:
Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com added the comment:
Out of interest, is there any reason that the configure check for pipe2 is a
special case near the bottom of configure.in instead of with all the other
function checks in the AC_CHECK_FUNCS[] section in the middle?
I know this patch
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'm not sure it's worth adding this to the PEP 7. The PEP is about conventions
and style not idioms.
PEP 8 has a section about Programming Recommendations that contains a few
idioms, but since PEP 7 doesn't have an equivalent section, I
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Terry, I think you can apply the patch you proposed in msg137085 and close this
issue.
If the recommended structure of test files is not documented, a section in the
devguide should be added, but that's another issue. (FWIW I'm not even
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Python 3.1.4 should be released today, so I think it's too late for this to be
fixed.
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10449
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
The release date of 3.1.4 is actually June 11th. Today will be released an RC
though, so what I said should still apply.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12170
___
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9382
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10224
___
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10225
___
___
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset a2688e252204 by Ned Deily in branch '3.1':
Issue #985064: Make plistlib more resilient to faulty input plists.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a2688e252204
New changeset f555d959a5d7 by Ned Deily in branch '3.2':
Issue #985064:
Ned Deily n...@acm.org added the comment:
Thank you for the patch and tests! Applied in 3.1 (for 3.1.4), 3.2 (for
3.2.1), and 3.3. (The 2.x version of plistlib differs somewhat from the 3.x
version so the patch would need some rework and testing for 2.7; that is
probably not worth the effort
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
Does this change have a visible effect? If so, can it have some unit test?
Otherwise pypy and other alternative implementations are likely to miss this
change.
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
Changes by Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com:
--
status: closed - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12106
___
___
Charles-François Natali neolo...@free.fr added the comment:
Out of interest, is there any reason that the configure check for pipe2 is a
special case near the bottom of configure.in instead of with all the other
function checks in the AC_CHECK_FUNCS[] section in the middle?
No clue. I'll
Changes by Charles-François Natali neolo...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +gregory.p.smith
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12196
___
___
Senthil Kumaran sent...@uthcode.com added the comment:
I think, if you speak to RM, you can just have this change in. Don't we get no
commits please email request from RM with hg or is the branch already cut?
--
___
Python tracker
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment:
From my review:
One genuine problem with a stale assert and comment in ast.c, and a small
objection to style in compile.c (I'd like a new compile_try() function to match
the new AST node).
Otherwise looked good in a desk review.
--
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment:
The AST version changed, and, more importantly, if other implementations pick
up our AST changes without updating their compilers accordingly, their symbol
table analysis and code compilation processes will break.
So yes, the test suite does
Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com added the comment:
Also, the pure python implementation of subprocess for posix can now be
updated to use pipe2 if it exists (previously on _posixsubprocess.c
used it).
I don't understand the last part :-)
What do you suggest?
Perhaps, os.pipe2 can
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for this answer.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12106
___
___
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment:
One other thing I should mention is that in a later checkin, Benjamin did add a
couple of explicit with statement examples to test_ast. These will fail if
other implementations don't update the front end of their compilation processes
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
That would be c4ddb460f4f2.
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12106
___
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Note that usually 'self' is not included in the arguments of methods. The 3.3
doc correctly uses e.g. copy_sign(other). A 'd.' could also be added so that
the end result looks like:
d.copy_sign(other)
but it's not mandatory (if done,
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10449
___
___
Changes by Adam Woodbeck adam.woodb...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +adam.woodbeck
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12185
___
___
Changes by Adam Woodbeck adam.woodb...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +adam.woodbeck
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11699
___
___
Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com added the comment:
To the extent that we can, we should try to support relative symlinks. Absolute
symlinks aren't the right thing in some cases, where the symlinks should be
movable with their targets. I use relative links extensively.
Is it worth
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset a2f088cf7ced by Ned Deily in branch '2.7':
Issue #11217: For 64-bit/32-bit Mac OS X universal framework builds,
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a2f088cf7ced
New changeset 7f2e3c466d57 by Ned Deily in branch '3.2':
Issue #11217: For
Changes by Adam Woodbeck adam.woodb...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +adam.woodbeck
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11644
___
___
Changes by Adam Woodbeck adam.woodb...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +adam.woodbeck
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11203
___
___
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
