On 10/25/2019 4:52 PM, DFS wrote:
=?iso-8859-9?b?T/B1eg==?=
=?utf-8?Q?=EB=AF=B8?=
=?GBK?B?0Pu66A==?=
=?UTF-8?B?zp3Or866zr/PgiDOks6tz4HOs86/z4I=?=
How does something like:
from email.header import decode_header
def test(s):
print(s)
s2 = decode_header(s)
print(s2[0][0])
On 1/29/2013 11:55 PM, RichD wrote:
I read Wall Street Journal, and occasionally check
articles on their Web site. It's mostly free, with some items
available to subscribers only. It seems random, which ones
they block, about 20%.
Anywho, sometimes I use their search utility, the usual author
Xah Lee wrote:
For those of you imperative programers who kept on hearing about lisp
and is tempted to learn, then, ...
You:
* consider yourself unfairly treated by various communities
* post a long drivel about various Lisp flavors to newsgroups
that are not in any way Lisp related
?
There
Jon Harrop wrote:
Xah Lee wrote:
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
Really? ``50 or hundreds'' of lines in C?
#include math.h /* for sqrt */
void normalize(double *out, double *in)
{
double denom = sqrt(in[0] * in[0] + in[1] * in[1] + in[2] *
in[2]);
out[0] = in[0]/denom;
Paul Wallich wrote:
Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:56:09 +, sln wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:11:48 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Warnock) wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*IS* raw machine code, *NOT* assembler!!
[snip]
I don't see the distinction.
Just dissasemble it and
Piet van Oostrum wrote:
Arne Vajhøj [EMAIL PROTECTED] (AV) wrote:
AV Robert Maas, http://tinyurl.com/uh3t wrote:
John W Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JWK Into the 60s, indeed, there were still machines being made
JWK that had no instruction comparable to the mainframe BASx/BALx
JWK family
Robert Maas, http://tinyurl.com/uh3t wrote:
John W Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JWK Into the 60s, indeed, there were still machines being made
JWK that had no instruction comparable to the mainframe BASx/BALx
JWK family, or to Intel's CALL. You had to do a subprogram call by
JWK first
Kevin McMurtrie wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Lew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WDC wrote:
BTW I reported it, yo should too.
To whom did you report it, so that we may also report it there?
Google does not accept spam complaints. Go ahead, try it. That's why
they've been the #1 Usenet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rickman wrote:
I love the way that people who plonk others feel the need to inform
everyone of it. That ranks up there with, I know what you are, but
what am I?
It is a matter of basic politeness and common courtesy. Without the
plonk, the killfiled poster is left
donald wrote:
Arne Vajhøj wrote:
Google does not accept spam complaints. Go ahead, try it. That's
why they've been the #1 Usenet spamming tool for years now. What
you're seeing is the spam slowly expanding into the software
development groups. uk.railway is probably a random group added
szr wrote:
Arne Vajhøj wrote:
szr wrote:
Peter Duniho wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008 22:40:03 -0700, szr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Arne Vajhøj wrote:
Stephan Bour wrote:
Lew wrote:
} John Thingstad wrote:
} Perl is solidly based in the UNIX world on awk, sed, } bash
and C. I don't like
szr wrote:
Arne Vajhøj wrote:
Stephan Bour wrote:
Lew wrote:
} John Thingstad wrote:
} Perl is solidly based in the UNIX world on awk, sed, bash and C.
} I don't like the style, but many do.
}
} Please exclude the Java newsgroups from this discussion.
Did it ever occur to you that you don't
szr wrote:
Peter Duniho wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008 22:40:03 -0700, szr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arne Vajhøj wrote:
Stephan Bour wrote:
Lew wrote:
} John Thingstad wrote:
} Perl is solidly based in the UNIX world on awk, sed, } bash
and C. I don't like the style, but many do.
}
} Please
Stephan Bour wrote:
Lew wrote:
} John Thingstad wrote:
} Perl is solidly based in the UNIX world on awk, sed, bash and C.
} I don't like the style, but many do.
}
} Please exclude the Java newsgroups from this discussion.
Did it ever occur to you that you don't speak for entire news groups?
Lew wrote:
Yes, but it's not SPAM.
SPAM is a registered trademark of Hormel Foods Corporation for a canned
pork product.
Spam is unwanted messages or email.
It should be rather obvious what is was.
Why not leave it to Hormel to complain ?
Arne
--
Lew wrote:
very
different. Having a dead - i mean end of development line software
like TeX - and
Based on what do you call it dead end. It's used, it's outlasted many
other flashes in the pan, it does what its users require. You will need
evidence for such a claim.
According to
llothar wrote:
I'm, not sure that I'm getting your point, but are you trying to argue that
_not_ knowing mathemathics makes you a better programmer?
No but it doesn't help you very much either. They are just different
skills.
Many things within programming have a foundation in mathematics
Erik Wikström wrote:
their reference (alias) mechanism. And C, Python, and Ruby probably
won't let you do that. What about Java and Perl?
C will let you do it with pointers (it is just a syntactical difference
from references in this case) and Java's references allows it.
Neither C or
[text reordered from top post to standard newsgroup style]
John Timney (MVP) wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 11, 9:35 am, John Timney \(MVP\)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I control one with C# then! Thats not on your site, clearly not
everything
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[some spam deleted]
This is a newsgroup of programming language Python, stop with this!
Actually this was posted to a bunch of newsgroups of which one is
about python.
Arne
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Danno wrote:
Xah Lee wrote:
This page gives a visual report of computer languages's popularity, as
indicated by their traffic level in newsgroups. This is not a
comprehensive or fair survey, but does give some indications of
popularity trends.
http://xahlee.org/lang_traf/index.html
Wow,
21 matches
Mail list logo
