On Aug 24, 5:37 pm, VanL van.lindb...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anybody who has worked with large graphs before give a recommendation?
when using large graphs another limitation may come from the various
graph algorithm run times. Most likely you will need to squeeze out as
much as possible and a
On Aug 14, 8:52 am, trias t.gkikopou...@dundee.ac.uk wrote:
Does anyone have some scripts I could use for this purpose. I work with
S.cerevisiae
Since the largest chromosome on the yeast genome is around 4 million
bp, the easiest way to accomplish your goal is to create a list of the
same size
On Mar 23, 10:16 am, CinnamonDonkey cinnamondon...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I'm fairly new to Python so I still have a lot to learn. But I'd like
to know how to correectly use relative imports.
Relative imports are *fundamentally* broken in python. You will soon
see that code using relative
On Mar 24, 3:16 pm, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
Did you know, once a module is imported by the first time
yeah yeah, could we not get sidetracked with details that are not
relevant? what it obviously means is to import it in all of your
modules that need to access to
On Mar 24, 9:35 pm, Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com wrote:
Works perfectly fine with relative imports.
This only demonstrates that you are not aware of what the problem
actually is.
Try using relative imports so that it works when you import the module
itself. Now run the module as a program.
On Feb 2, 12:06 pm, Thorsten Kampe thors...@thorstenkampe.de wrote:
It makes my eyes bleed
Ever tried sunglasses?
Sunglasses for bleeding eyes? For pete's sake try bandages.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
conclusions ---
try testing on a large number of candidates that are all (or mostly)
positive or all (or mostly) negative and you'll see performance
numbers that are substantially different than the ones you report:
candidates = range(1000)
In general the
New submission from Istvan Albert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The write performance into text files is substantially slower (5x-8x)
than that of python 2.5. This makes python 3.0 unsuited to any
application that needs to write larger amounts of data.
test code follows
Istvan Albert [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Well I would strongly dispute that anyone other than the developers
expected this. The release documentation states:
The net result of the 3.0 generalizations is that Python 3.0 runs the
pystone benchmark around 10% slower than Python 2.5
Could someone run the code below on both Python 2.5 and 3.0
For me (on Windows) it runs over 7 times slower with Python 3.0
import time
lo, hi, step = 10**5, 10**6, 10**5
# writes increasingly more lines to a file
for N in range(lo, hi, step):
fp = open('foodata.txt', 'wt')
start =
On Dec 5, 3:06 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should get faster over time. It will get faster over a shorter period of
time if people contribute patches.
I see, thanks for the clarification.
I will make the point though that this makes python 3.0 unsuited for
anyone who has to process data.
On Dec 5, 3:41 pm, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed the read() slowness yesterday. You'll get the fix in the next
release of Python 3.0 in a couple of weeks.
Does this fix speed up the write() function as well?
A previous poster suggested that in this case the slowdown is
On Dec 3, 8:07 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
snip code
Originally, like many others here I said YIKES! but on a second read,
it is not that bad. It actually grows on you.
After looking at it one more time I found it neat, very concise
without being
Congratulations on a fantastic work!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I can confirm this,
I am getting very slow read performance when reading a smaller 20 MB
file.
- Python 2.5 takes 0.4 seconds
- Python 3.0 takes 62 seconds
fname = dmel-2R-chromosome-r5.1.fasta
data = open(fname, 'rt').read()
print ( len(data) )
--
On Dec 4, 1:31 pm, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerry Hill wrote:
That's 3 orders of magnitude slower on python3.0!
Timing of os interaction may depend on os. I verified above on WinXp
with 4 meg Pythonxy.chm file. Eye blink versus 3 secs, duplicated. I
think something is wrong
Turns out write performance is also slow!
The program below takes
3 seconds on python 2.5
17 seconds on python 3.0
yes, 17 seconds! tested many times in various order. I believe the
slowdowns are not constant (3x) but some sort of nonlinear function
(quadratic?) play with the N to see it.
On Sep 26, 4:52 am, redbaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How could I avoid of storing them? I need something to check does it
ready or not and retrieve results if ready. I couldn't see the way to
achieve same result without storing asyncs set.
It all depends on what you are trying to do. The
On Sep 25, 8:40 am, Max Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At any time in main process there are shouldn't be no more than two copies of
data
(one original data and one result).
From the looks of it you are storing a lots of references to various
copies of your data via the async set.
--
On May 20, 6:13 pm, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Salvatore DI DI0 schrieb:
Hello,
The Processing Graphics language has been implemented in Javascript.
No, it hasn't. Processing is written in Java.
He meant it has been re-implemented in Javascript:
On Apr 29, 3:51 am, Zed A. Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can grab the most recent draft of the book at:
http://zedshaw.com/projects/vellum/manual-final.pdf
However, I'm curious to get other people's thoughts.
IMO if you would refrain from using swear words in the manual it would
help
On Apr 23, 2:08 pm, Bob Woodham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
x = x++;
has unspecified behaviour in C. That is, it is not specified
whether the value of x after execution of the statement is the
old value of x or one plus the old value of x.
unspecified means that the result could be anything:
On Apr 22, 6:25 am, azrael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A friend of mine i a proud PERL developer which always keeps making
jokes on python's cost.
This hurts. Please give me informations about realy famous
aplications.
you could show him what Master Yoda said when he compared Python to
Perl
On Apr 18, 1:39 am, Sverker Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some whine. Some just don't care. Why not whine?
Whining and ranting is actually good for the psyche. It is better to
get it out of your system.
As for your original post, no doubt there are substantial downsides to
introducing Py3K,
On Apr 9, 11:53 am, John Nagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The general consensus is that Python 3.x isn't much of an
there are a number of unfortunate typos in there that interfere with
the message,
instead of The general consensus is I think you actually meant In
my opinion
i.
--
On Mar 26, 5:28 pm, Sean Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am working with genomic data. Basically, it consists of many tuples
of (start,end) on a line. I would like to convert these tuples of
(start,end) to a string of bits where a bit is 1 if it is covered by
any of the regions described by
On Mar 27, 10:53 am, Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is subprocess.Popen completely broken?
Your lack of faith in Python is somewhat disturbing ...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mar 4, 3:13 pm, Mensanator [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what if _I_ wanted to make a repeatable sequence for test
purposes? Wouldn't factorint() destroy my attempt by reseeding
on every call?
Would it?
It may just be that you are now itching to see a problem even where
there isn't one.
On Feb 18, 9:58 am, SPE - Stani's Python Editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the release of Phatch which is a
powerful batch processor and renamer. Phatch exposes a big part of
This program is fantastic! Very accesible user interface and produces
ggreat images.
Thanks!
On Feb 5, 12:31 pm, dmitrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
the urlhttp://torquedev.blogspot.com/2008/02/changes-in-air.html
(blog of a game developers)
says IronPython is faster than CPython in 1.6 times.
Is it really true?
This is a second time around that IronPython piqued my interest
On Feb 5, 4:56 pm, Arnaud Delobelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it be because .NET doesn't have arbitrary length integer types
and your little benchmark will create lots of integers 2**32 ?
What is the result if you replace foo(a) with
def foo(a): return sqrt(a)
Good observation, in
On Dec 30, 5:23 am, thebjorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
def age(dob, today=datetime.date.today()):
...
None of my unit tests caught that one :-)
interesting example I can see how it caused some trouble. A quick fix
would be to write it:
def age(dob, today=datetime.date.today ):
and
On Dec 29, 11:21 pm, bukzor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The standard library is not affected because
the people who wrote code into it know how python works.
Programming abounds with cases that some people think should work
differently:
a = b = []
a.append(1)
is b empty or not at this point?
On Dec 30, 3:29 am, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One recipe is extracting blocks from text files that are delimited by a
special start and end line.
Neat solution!
I actually need such functionality every once in a while.
Takewhile + dropwhile to the rescue!
i.
--
On Dec 30, 11:26 am, George Sakkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm with you on this one; IMHO it's one of the relatively few language
design missteps of Python, favoring the rare case as the default
instead of the common one.
George, you pointed this out this link in a different thread
On Dec 30, 3:41 pm, bukzor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No globals, as you specified. BTW, it's silly not to 'allow' globals
when they're called for, otherwise we wouldn't need the 'global'
keyword.
okay, now note that you do not actually use the ingroup list for
anything else but getting and
On Dec 28, 11:27 pm, bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm playing around, researching sqlobject, and i notice that it appears to
require the use of id in each tbl it handles in the database.
is there a way to overide this function/behavior...
there better be such way. An ORM that does not
On Dec 29, 10:22 am, Tim Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If, however, order matters, you have to do it in a slightly
buffered manner.
Can be reduced to a sed one-liner
I think the original version works just as well for both cases. Your
sed version however does need the order you mention.
on a second read ... I see that you mean the case that should only
join consecutive lines with the same key
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 29, 12:50 pm, bukzor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this functionality intended? It seems very unintuitive. This has
caused a bug in my programs twice so far, and both times I was
completely mystified until I!realized that the default value was
changing.
it is only unintuitive when you
On Dec 29, 1:11 pm, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google for Python mutable default arguments
and a mere 30 minutes later this thread is already one of the results
that come up
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 29, 6:10 pm, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These thoughts reflect my own experience with the itertools module.
It may be that your experience with them has been different. Please
let me know what you think.
first off, the itertools module is amazing, thanks for creating
On Dec 24, 7:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any tips welcome.
pickling has a text protocol that should be compatible across python
versions. Pickle each of your database entries to a different file,
then read them in the newer version of the script.
i.
--
On Dec 20, 8:16 pm, PatrickMinnesota [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
seen all the lists. I've done my reading. What I don't have is
actual testimonials by people who have used a chunk of code to program
an animated 2D game and had a great experience.
You could use Panda3D to create the game, who
On Dec 21, 1:44 pm, Giampaolo Rodola' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the main module is very big (more than 2800 lines of code)
maybe that is the actual problem to begin with,
you should refactor it so it it more modular and trackable, otherwise
this is just one of the many issues that will
On Dec 19, 8:07 pm, Giampaolo Rodola' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone point me in the right direction?
download_url = 'http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/downloads/list',
you'll need to specify the full path to the actual archive, a link
that one could use to download the archive, not
On Dec 19, 9:44 pm, Istvan Albert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 19, 8:07 pm, Giampaolo Rodola' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
download_url = 'http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/downloads/list',
this is from looking at your setup.py here:
http://pyftpdlib.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/setup.py
On Dec 11, 2:14 pm, massimo s. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dislike more is that it seems working by *rows* instead than by
*columns*.
you can easily transpose the data to get your columns, for a data file
that looks like this:
data.txt
A,B,C
1,2,3
10,20,30
100,200,300
do the
On Dec 8, 8:26 am, Michael Ströder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But conventional CGI scripts are implemented with the assumption of being
stateless.
while it might be that some CGI scripts must be executed in a new
python process on each request, common sense and good programming
practices would
On Nov 25, 1:55 am, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The other question is whether there is even a demand for this. Do
people want to be able to take unmodified Python CGI scripts and try
to run them persistently in this way, or would they be better off
converting them to proper WSGI
On Nov 21, 12:15 am, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would say that that is now debatable. Overall mod_wsgi is probably a
better package in terms of what it has to offer. Only thing against
mod_wsgi at this point is peoples willingness to accept something that
is new in
On Nov 19, 2:33 pm, Francesc Altet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record. I was unable to stop thinking about this, and
after some investigation, I guess that my rememberings were gathered
from some benchmarks with code in Pyrex (i.e. pretty near to C speed).
Pretty interesting and
On Nov 20, 9:42 am, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
12/7. Django comes with its own little server so that you don't have
to set up Apache on your desktop to play with it.
I was rather shocked to learn that django only has this tiny server and does
not come with a stand-alone
On Nov 16, 1:18 pm, Michael Bacarella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right, it is completely inappropriate for us to be showing our
dirty laundry to the public.
you are misinterpreting my words on many levels,
(and I of course could have refrained from the chair-monitor jab as
well)
anyhow,
On Nov 16, 10:59 am, Chris Mellon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GC has a heuristic where it kicks in when (allocations -
deallocations) exceeds a certain threshold,
As the available ram increases this threshold can be more easily
reached. Ever since I moved to 2Gb ram I stumbled upon issues
On Nov 14, 6:26 pm, Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cybersource.com.au wrote:
On systems with multiple CPUs or 64-bit systems, or both, creating and/or
deleting a multi-megabyte dictionary in recent versions of Python (2.3,
2.4, 2.5 at least) takes a LONG time, of the order of 30+ minutes,
On Nov 15, 4:11 pm, Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cybersource.com.au wrote:
Unless you're accusing both myself and the original poster of outright
lying, of faking our results, what's your explanation?
I don't attribute it to malice, I think you're simply measuring
something else. You both
On Nov 13, 11:27 am, Francesc Altet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another possibility is using an indexed column in a table in a DB.
Lookups there should be much faster than using a dictionary as well.
I would agree with others who state that for a simple key based lookup
nothing beats a
On Nov 12, 12:39 pm, Michael Bacarella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The win32 Python or the cygwin Python?
What CPU architecture?
it is the win32 version, a dual core laptop with T5220 Core 2
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Nov 10, 4:56 pm, Michael Bacarella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This would seem to implicate the line id2name[id] = name as being
excruciatingly slow.
As others have pointed out there is no way that this takes 45
minutes.Must be something with your system or setup.
A functionally equivalent
On Nov 11, 11:25 am, Michael Bacarella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried your code (with one change, time on feedback lines) and got the
same terrible
performance against my data set.
To prove that my machine is sane, I ran the same against your generated
sample file and got _excellent_
On Nov 11, 11:51 am, Michael Bacarella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and see it take about 45 minutes with this:
$ cat cache-keys.py
#!/usr/bin/python
v = {}
for line in open('keys.txt'):
v[long(line.strip())] = True
On my system (windows vista) your code (using your data) runs in:
36
On Oct 17, 7:20 am, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still remember Gadfly fondly.
What a great piece of software Gadfly is ... congrats on that Aaron.
For me it was one of the first Python packages that truly stood out
and made me want to learn Python.
i.
--
On Oct 18, 5:04 pm, IamIan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OP's problem is that he suffers from the delusion that people want
to steal the source code for hisCGIscript.
Why is assuming someone may try to get my source CGI delusional?
I'm on a shared server (Dreamhost). The CGI itself has
On Oct 11, 2:23 am, IamIan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is a very lengthy garbled js file
athttp://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js
The first piece of JavaScript works fine and the ads display
correctly, however the second file throws an unterminated string
literal js error.
On Oct 9, 11:57 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you are starting a new project you may want to look into
something new and different
http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/examples
This is actually a neat framework! I'm a somewhat of fan of web-
frameworks and I used most major ones and I like to poke
On Oct 9, 7:26 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it doesn't stand for anything.
It also reminds me of someone we all know, and I wish it didn't.
As the latin proverb says Nomen est omen. Calling your package
docindexer would draw a lot more people. It is hard to justify to a
third party that a
On Oct 9, 9:14 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a great tradition of tounge-in-cheek package names, like
Cold fusion, for example.
Cold Fusion is a super cool name. Nobody will every think of it as
representing something odd or silly.
too late now. sorry again,
why would it be late? is the
IMO this is not as much a framework comparison rather than an
evaluation of the individual components that make up Pylons.
The framework is the sum of all its parts. Programmers should not need
to know that that a package named Beaker is used for sessions, Routes
for url mapping, PasteDeploy for
On Oct 7, 12:24 pm, Michele Simionato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here we disagree: I think that a programmer should know what he
is using.
My point was that they should not *need* to know. Too much information
can be detrimental.
Where is the session data stored: in memory, files, database
On Sep 26, 2:09 am, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
behaviour with a specific invocation of 'setup.py'. But how can I
disallow this from within the 'setup.py' program, so my users don't
have to be aware of this unexpected default behaviour?
I don't have the answer for this, but I can tell
On Sep 26, 8:06 am, Berteun Damman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that have been created after I don't need them anymore. I furthermore
don't really see why there would be references to these larger objects
left. (I can be mistaken of course).
This could be tricky because you have a graph that
Two comments,
...
self.item3 = float(foo[c]); c+=1
self.item4 = float(foo[c]); c+=1
self.item5 = float(foo[c]); c+=1
self.item6 = float(foo[c]); c+=1
...
this here (and your code in general) is mind boggling and not in a
good way,
as for you original question, I don't think that reading
On Sep 20, 7:44 pm, Norm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
without meaning to start a flame war between the various python web
tools, I was wondering if anyone had a review of the status of Zope.
For example, is it being used for new projects or just maintenance?
Zope is heavily used. It is a mature
On Sep 21, 7:04 pm, Sean Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
someone could contrast Zope w/ another Python framework like Twisted.
I've been investing some time in learning Zope/Plone and would love to
hear someone speak to alternatives.
Twisted is a networking engine, Zope is a web application
On Sep 20, 7:13 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How come it's not? Then I noticed you don't have brackets in
the join statement. So I tried without them and got
If memory serves me right newer versions of python will recognize and
optimize string concatenation via the +=
On Sep 12, 5:27 am, Christoph Krammer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
string = self._file.read(stop - self._file.tell())
MemoryError
This line reads an entire message into memory as a string. Is it
possible that you have a huge email in there (hundreds of MB) with
some attachment encoded as text?
On Sep 7, 12:42 pm, wang frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is my conclusion correct that Python is slower than matlab?
There are ways to speed up code execution, but to see substantial
improvement you'll need to use numpy and rework the code to operate
on vectors/matrices rather than building the
On Aug 29, 8:12 am, Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Caution : L[0] and L[1:] are COPIES of the head and tail of the list.
Sorry, should have written RETURN copies instead of ARE copies.
L[0] does not return a copy, it does what is says, returns the object
stored at index 0.
i.
--
On Aug 8, 9:38 am, brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that I have 512 things to add to the queue, but my limit
is half that... whoops. Shouldn't the interpreter tell me that I'm an
idiot for trying to do this instead of just hanging? A message such as
this would be more appropriate:
On Aug 6, 6:49 am, Neil Cerutti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incidentally, from the second link I find it shocking that the
keyword parameter file shadows a builtin. It seems to endorse a
bad practice.
I believe that the file builtin has been removed as well so it won't
shadow anything.
i.
--
On Aug 6, 6:11 am, Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why on earth did they make this change? It just seems gratuitous.
Having print a function (with parameters) makes is very easy to modify
where the output goes.
Say you want to have some prints go to one particular file, today you
On Aug 8, 12:08 pm, Paul Boddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, for every enthusiast of one approach, there
will always be an enthusiast for another (see point #6):
True.
For example I for one also like the way the current print adds a
newline, the vast majority of the time that is exactly
On Aug 8, 2:00 pm, Neil Cerutti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought, in fact, that open was on more shaky ground. ;)
yeah, that too ...
I can't find any evidence of that in the PEPs. Do you have a reference?
here is something:
On Jul 27, 2:16 am, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
References are not objects.
yes this a valid objection,
but in all fairness the example in the original post operates on
comparably sized objects and also exhibited unexpected performance
degradation
as it turns out the garbage
On Jul 27, 1:24 am, Peter Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you are allocating a lot of objects without releasing them the garbage
collector kicks in to look for cycles. Try switching it off:
import gc
gc.disable()
Yes, this solves the problem I was experiencing. Thanks.
Istvan
--
On Jul 27, 2:18 pm, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What was really surprising is that it works
with no issues up until 1 million items
later editing made the sentence more difficult to read
I should have said: What was really surprising is that zip works
with no issues up until 1
On Jul 26, 9:33 pm, Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do a top or vmstat while that is happening and see if you are
swapping. You are allocating 10 million ints and 10 million tuple
nodes, = 20 million objects. Although, even at 100 bytes per object
that would be 1GB which would
Hello all,
I've been debugging the reason for a major slowdown in a piece of
code ... and it turns out that it was the zip function. In the past
the lists that were zipped were reasonably short, but once the size
exceeded 10 million the zip function slowed to a crawl. Note that
there was memory
On Jul 26, 7:44 pm, Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Istvan Albert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
exceeded 10 million the zip function slowed to a crawl. Note that
there was memory available to store over 100 million items.
How many bytes is that? Maybe the items (heap-allocated boxed
On May 19, 3:33 am, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be invalid syntax since the third line is an assignment
with target identifiers separated only by spaces.
Plus, the identifier starts with a number (even though ６ is not DIGIT
SIX, but FULLWIDTH DIGIT SIX, it's
On May 17, 2:30 pm, Gregor Horvath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any difference for you in debugging this code snippets?
class Türstock(object):
Of course there is, how do I type the ü ? (I can copy/paste for
example, but that gets old quick).
But you're making a strawman argument by
On May 16, 5:04 pm, Victor Kryukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our main requirement for tools we're going to use is rock-solid
stability. As one of our team-members puts it, We want to use tools
that are stable, has many developer-years and thousands of user-years
behind them, and that we
On May 16, 11:09 pm, Gregor Horvath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On May 16, 12:54 pm, Gregor Horvath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Istvan Albert schrieb:
So the solution is to forbid Chinese XP ?
Who said anything like that? It's just an example of surprising
On May 17, 9:07 am, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
up. I interviewed about 20 programmers (none of them Python users), and
most took the position I might not use it myself, but it surely
can't hurt having it, and there surely are people who would use it.
Typically when you ask
As a non-native English speaker,
On May 13, 11:44 am, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- should non-ASCII identifiers be supported? why?
No. I don't think it adds much, I think it will be a little used
feature (as it should be), every python instructor will start their
class by saying
Here is a comprehensive review of python web apps:
http://jesusphreak.infogami.com/blog/vrp1
Since this comes up every so often in this group.
i.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mar 5, 5:16 pm, Alex Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to avoid. Any suggestions?
try the networkx package, it includes the pygraphviz module that can
generate dot files:
https://networkx.lanl.gov/wiki
Istvan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mar 6, 3:18 pm, Istvan Albert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try the networkx package, it includes the pygraphviz module that can
generate dot files:
https://networkx.lanl.gov/wiki
should've checked it before posting, it seems nowadays is actually a
separate package
https://networkx.lanl.gov
On Feb 14, 1:33 am, Maric Michaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At this time, it 's not easy to explain him that python
is notflawed compared to Java, and that he will not
regret his choice in the future.
Database adaptors such as psycopg do release the GIL while connecting
and exchanging data.
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
