On 14 July 2013 04:09, vek.m1...@gmail.com wrote:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17632246/beazley-4e-p-e-r-page29-unicode
directly writing a raw UTF-8 encoded string such as 'Jalape\xc3\xb1o' simply
produces a nine-character string U+004A, U+0061, U+006C, U+0061, U+0070,
U+0065,
On 12 July 2013 04:43, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
My last post seems to have been eaten by either Thunderbird or the
EternalSeptember servers, but it contained an erroneous claim that the
straight function version performed as well as the factory one. However, in
the interim a co-worker
On 12 July 2013 10:27, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:23 PM, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
I would not care too much about the performance
of re.
With the new Flexible String Representation, you
can use a logarithmic scale to compare re results.
To be
On 12 July 2013 11:45, Devyn Collier Johnson devyncjohn...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you explain what you mean? What and where is the new Flexible String
Representation?
Do not worry. jmf is on about his old rant comparing broken previous
versions of Python to newer ones which in some
On 9 July 2013 10:34, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no symbole for radian because mathematically
radian is a pure number, a unitless number. You can
hower sepecify a = ... in radian (rad).
Isn't a superscript c the symbol for radians?
--
Joshua Landau added the comment:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0448/ is out; see what you think.
See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2013-July/021872.html for all
the juicy discussion so far.
--
nosy: +Joshua.Landau
___
Python
On 11 July 2013 07:06, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
But really, I'm having trouble understanding what sort of application
would have run an iterator to exhaustion without doing anything with the
values as the performance bottleneck :-)
Definitely not this one. Heck, there's even
On 10 July 2013 10:12, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Mats Peterson matsp...@aim.com wrote:
Then they would have full control of this list and what gets pos
Ahhh so this is pos, right? Telling the truth? Interesting.
I don't know what you mean by
On 10 July 2013 08:55, Mats Peterson matsp...@aim.com wrote:
Unjustified Insult. [anumuson from Stack Overflow] has deleted all
my postings regarding Python regular expression matching being
extremely slow compared to Perl. Additionally my account has been
suspended for 7 days. Unjustified
Google Groups is writing about your recently sent mail to Joshua
Landau. Unfortunately this address has been discontinued from usage
for the foreseeable future. The sent message is displayed below:
On 10 July 2013 12:08, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-07-10 10:52, Joshua
On 10 July 2013 13:01, Mats Peterson matsp...@aim.com wrote:
Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Op 10-07-13 11:03, Mats Peterson schreef:
Not a troll. It's just hard to convince Python users that their beloved
language would have inferior regular expression performance to Perl.
On 10 July 2013 12:14, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Op 10-07-13 11:03, Mats Peterson schreef:
Not a troll. It's just hard to convince Python users that their beloved
language would have inferior regular expression performance to Perl.
All right, you have convinced me. Now
On 10 July 2013 13:35, Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com wrote:
Either that or it's funny only to other Australians.
Or the Dutch.
Or us Brits.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 10 July 2013 15:00, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
And now for something completely different.
I knocked together a prime number generator, just for the fun of it,
that works like a Sieve of Eratosthenes but unbounded. It keeps track
of all known primes and the next composite that
On 10 July 2013 10:00, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:55:05 +, Mats Peterson wrote:
A moderator who calls himself “animuson” on Stack Overflow doesn’t want
to face the truth. He has deleted all my postings regarding Python
regular expression matching
On 10 July 2013 17:15, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:47 AM, bas blswink...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:12:19 PM UTC+2, Chris Angelico wrote:
Well, that does answer the question. Unfortunately the use of lambda
there has a severe performance
On 10 July 2013 18:15, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:54:02 +0100, Joshua Landau wrote:
On 10 July 2013 10:00, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:55:05 +, Mats Peterson wrote:
A moderator who calls himself
On 10 July 2013 17:18, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 07/10/2013 08:54 AM, Joshua Landau wrote:
On 10 July 2013 10:00, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:55:05 +, Mats Peterson wrote:
A moderator who calls himself “animuson” on Stack Overflow
On 10 July 2013 19:56, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Joshua Landau jos...@landau.ws wrote:
If you care about speed, you might want to check the heapq module.
Removing the smallest item and inserting a new item in a heap both cost
O(log(N)) time
On 11 July 2013 00:18, CM cmpyt...@gmail.com wrote:
I was mainly talking in the context of the original post, where it
seems something slightly different was meant. If you're deploying to
customers, you'd want to offer them an installer. At least, I think
you would. That's different from
On 30 June 2013 07:06, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple, and
write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way to achieve
the same thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing Python's clean
syntax in the process.
This
I have this innocent and simple code:
from collections import deque
exhaust_iter = deque(maxlen=0).extend
exhaust_iter.__doc__ = Exhaust an iterator efficiently without
caching any of its yielded values.
Obviously it does not work. Is there a way to get it to work simply
and without creating a
On 11 July 2013 04:57, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Joshua Landau jos...@landau.ws writes:
I have this innocent and simple code:
from collections import deque
exhaust_iter = deque(maxlen=0).extend
exhaust_iter.__doc__ = Exhaust an iterator efficiently without
caching any
On 11 July 2013 05:13, Joshua Landau jos...@landau.ws wrote:
misunderstanding in response to misunderstanding
Ah, I get it. It is easy to misread my post as I have this
exhaust_iter and it's obvious it doesn't work because why else would
I post here what do I do HALP!
Yeah, sorry -- it wasn't
On 9 July 2013 03:08, Adam Evanovich ajetrum...@gmail.com wrote:
Joshua,
Why did you send me an email reply instead of replying in the google groups?
Apologies, although it's not quite that simple. I access this list the
way it was originally intended -- through EMail. I replied to all,
which
On 9 July 2013 05:46, CM cmpyt...@gmail.com wrote:
*I said*:
There are projects that bundle the CPython interpreter with your
project, but this makes those files really big.
Maybe 5-20 MB. That's a lot bigger than a few hundred K, but it's not that
important to keep size down, really.
Fair
On 10 July 2013 00:35, CM cmpyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:13:17 PM UTC-4, Joshua Landau wrote:
On 9 July 2013 03:08, Adam Evanovich ajetrum...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you wrap source code/libs/apps into an EXE and just
send that to the end user? Or is it more complicated
On some multitude of times, CM cmpyt...@gmail.com wrote:
What I was thinking of was that if you are going to sell software, you want
to make it as easy as possible, and that includes not making the potential
customer have to install anything, or even agree to allow you to explicitly
install
On 10 July 2013 05:49, CM cmpyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:12:16 AM UTC-4, Joshua Landau wrote:
On some multitude of times, CM cmpyt...@gmail.com wrote:
What I was thinking of was that if you are going to sell software, you
want to make it as easy as possible
On 5 July 2013 08:34, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Νίκος Gr33k ni...@superhost.gr wrote:
Of course we all know that a serial/patch/keygen/crack can be found for this
great edit very easily on warez or torrentz sites so it was like a common
secret to
On 8 July 2013 09:53, Sanza101 sandile.mnu...@gmail.com wrote:
I just started using Python recently, and i need help with the following:
Please assist.
Rather than saying you want help with Please assist, why don't you
ask a question?
I find when people start their post with I need help,
On 8 July 2013 00:32, Xue Fuqiao xfq.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
(English is not my native language; please excuse typing errors.)
I'm a Python newbie and just started reading PEP 8. PEP says:
---
|The closing
On 8 July 2013 13:05, Sandile Mnukwa sandile.mnu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joshua,
Hello.
You replied off-list (to me only, not to Python-list). I imagine this
was a mistake, so I'm posting to Python-list again. If this wasn't a
mistake, then I apologize and suggest telling people when you mean to
On 8 July 2013 13:02, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:39:21 +0100, Joshua Landau wrote:
Imagine:
a_wonderful_set_of_things = {
bannanas_made_of_apples,
chocolate_covered_horns,
doors_that_slide,
china_but_on_the_moon
On 8 July 2013 13:27, Dave Angel da...@davea.name wrote:
One of your classmates has already posted the question. However, you win
the prize for a better subject line. Or are you the same student, changing
your name and wasting our time by starting a new thread.
Considering the body of the
On 8 July 2013 12:54, Neil Cerutti ne...@norwich.edu wrote:
On 2013-07-07, Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 13:24:43 +, Neil Cerutti wrote:
for x in range(4):
print(x)
print(x) # Vader NOoOO!!!
That loops do *not* introduce a
On 4 July 2013 05:36, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Joshua Landau
joshua.landau...@gmail.com wrote:
That said, I'm not too convinced. Personally, the proper way to do
what you are talking about is creating a new closure. Like:
for i in range(100
On 8 July 2013 21:52, CM cmpyt...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking for a Pythonic way to do the following:
I have data in the form of a long list of tuples. I would like to break that
list into four sub-lists. The break points would be based on the nth
occasion of a particular tuple. (The
On 8 July 2013 22:24, Joshua Landau joshua.landau...@gmail.com wrote:
if count == 60:
Obviously this should be:
if count == length:
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 8 July 2013 21:43, Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com wrote:
I have an idea. Take the threads where students ask the list to do
their homework for them (but don't have the cojones to admit that's
what they are doing), and merge them with the obfuscated Python idea.
A group of people could come
On 8 July 2013 22:38, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
On 08/07/2013 21:56, Dave Angel wrote:
Characters do not have a width.
[snip]
It depends what you mean by width! :-)
Try this (Python 3):
print(A\N{FULLWIDTH LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A})
AＡ
Serious question: How would one find
On 9 July 2013 02:45, ajetrum...@gmail.com wrote:
all,
I am unhappy with the general Python documentation and tutorials. I have
worked with Python very little and I'm well aware of the fact that it is a
lower-level language that integrates with the shell.
I came from a VB legacy
On 7 July 2013 09:15, Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/7/7 Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info:
I sometimes find myself needing to promote[1] arbitrary numbers
(Decimals, Fractions, ints) to floats. E.g. I might say:
numbers = [float(num) for num in
On 6 July 2013 06:19, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 6, 2013 10:05:14 AM UTC+5:30, Joshua Landau wrote:
I never got why Vi doesn't support Ctrl-C by default -- it's not like
it's a used key-combination and it would have helped me so many times
when I was younger.
Dunno
On 6 July 2013 13:59, Russel Walker russ.po...@gmail.com wrote:
Since I've already wasted a thread I might as well...
Does this serve as an acceptable solution?
def supersum(sequence, start=0):
result = type(start)()
for item in sequence:
try:
result +=
On 6 July 2013 15:58, terry433...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have a python program that reads test result information from SQL and
creates the following data that I want to capture in a data structure so it
can be prioritized appropriately :-
test_name new fail
On 7 July 2013 04:56, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
I sometimes find myself needing to promote[1] arbitrary numbers
(Decimals, Fractions, ints) to floats. E.g. I might say:
numbers = [float(num) for num in numbers]
or if you prefer:
numbers = map(float,
On 7 July 2013 05:48, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sun, 07 Jul 2013 05:17:01 +0100, Joshua Landau wrote:
On 7 July 2013 04:56, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
...
def promote(x):
if isinstance(x, str): raise TypeError return
On 7 July 2013 06:14, Joshua Landau joshua.landau...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 July 2013 05:48, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sun, 07 Jul 2013 05:17:01 +0100, Joshua Landau wrote:
On 7 July 2013 04:56, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote
On 5 July 2013 17:25, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
For comparison, here's my solution:
CODE
Unfortunately, there are some sudokus that require guessing - your
algorithm will not solve those. A combination algorithm would be best,
AFAIK.
-
FWIW, this is my interpretation of the
On 6 July 2013 04:25, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
In article mailman.4323.1373080433.3114.python-l...@python.org,
Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a vi user. Once I mastered hit ESC by reflex when you pause
typing an insert I was never confused above which mode I was in.
On 4 July 2013 17:54, Rotwang sg...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
53*(63**100 - 1)//62
Or about 10**10**6.255 (so about 1.80M digits long).
For the unicode side (Python 3, in other words) and reusing your math
(ya better hope it's right!), you are talking:
97812*((97812+2020)**100 -
On 4 July 2013 08:32, cutems93 ms2...@cornell.edu wrote:
I am researching on editors for my own reference. I found that each of them
has some features that other don't, but I am not sure which features are
significant/necessary for a GOOD editor. What features do you a good editor
should
On 4 July 2013 06:39, Peter Otten __pete...@web.de wrote:
Joshua Landau wrote:
On 3 July 2013 23:19, Joshua Landau joshua.landau...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't want to do that, you'd need to use introspection of a
remarkably hacky sort. If you want that, well, it'll take a mo.
After some
Just a minor suggestion:
def display_board(board):
print ' a b c d e f g h'
print '+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+'
for row in range(8):
for col in range(8):
piece = board[row * 8 + col]
if piece_type[piece] == WHITE:
print '|
On 4 July 2013 12:19, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Op 04-07-13 01:40, Joshua Landau schreef:
Bear in mind that if the way you were acting was all in my with
trepidation category, I would likely have not spoken up. I believe
you crossed a lot further beyond that line.
I
On 5 July 2013 03:03, Dave Angel da...@davea.name wrote:
On 07/04/2013 09:24 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 17:54:20 +0100, Rotwang wrote:
It's perhaps worth mentioning that some non-ascii characters are allowed
in identifiers in Python 3, though I don't know which ones.
PEP
On 5 July 2013 03:03, Dave Angel da...@davea.name wrote:
In particular,
http://docs.python.org/3.3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#identifiers
has a definition for id_continue that includes several interesting
categories. I expected the non-ASCII digits, but there's other stuff there,
On 2 July 2013 23:19, Surya Kasturi sur...@ieee.org wrote:
I think I didnt explain it clearly.. let me make it clear..
Yeah... I don't get it.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3 July 2013 23:09, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
I have a set of methods which take args that I decorate twice,
def wrapped(func):
def wrap(*args, **kwargs):
try:
val = func(*args, **kwargs)
# some work
except BaseException
On 3 July 2013 23:19, Joshua Landau joshua.landau...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't want to do that, you'd need to use introspection of a
remarkably hacky sort. If you want that, well, it'll take a mo.
After some effort I'm pretty confident that the hacky way is impossible.
--
http
On 3 July 2013 02:21, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 07/02/2013 05:18 PM, Joshua Landau wrote:
On 2 July 2013 23:34, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
[...]
Needless to say, I disagree with your position. There is no place for
baseless insults in this community; but when the behaviour
On 3 July 2013 11:01, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Op 02-07-13 15:40, Joshua Landau schreef:
On 2 July 2013 13:01, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
There is not ever a place on this list where you will need to call
someone incompetent. You can explain
On 4 July 2013 04:52, Maciej Dziardziel fied...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of curiosity: Does anyone know why the code below is valid in python3,
but not python2:
def foo(*args, bar=1, **kwargs):
pass
Python 3 gained syntax for keyword-only arguments.
Try foo(1) and it will fail -- bar needs
On 4 July 2013 05:07, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
With respect to the Huffman coding of declarations, Javascript gets it
backwards. Locals ought to be more common, but they require more
On 4 July 2013 05:36, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Joshua Landau
joshua.landau...@gmail.com wrote:
That said, I'm not too convinced. Personally, the proper way to do
what you are talking about is creating a new closure. Like:
for i in range(100
On 4 July 2013 05:47, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/07/2013 2:12 PM, Joshua Landau wrote:
On 4 July 2013 04:52, Maciej Dziardziel fied...@gmail.com wrote:
def foo(*args, bar=1, **kwargs):
pass
Try foo(1) and it will fail -- bar needs to be given as a keyword.
No it won't
On 2 July 2013 08:22, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Op 01-07-13 21:28, Joshua Landau schreef:
Well then you are wrong. But fine, I'll use your definition incorrect
as it may be (when talking to you, please don't misrepresent my other
posts).
Nevertheless
On 2 July 2013 13:01, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Op 02-07-13 11:34, Joshua Landau schreef:
No it does not. I'd give you more of a counter but I actually have no
idea how you came up with that.
Please answer the following question. If someone behaved incompetently,
how
On 2 July 2013 16:51, Steve Simmons square.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Erm,
It probably isn't the best time to start this post but I was wondering...
Does this list have a code of conduct or a netiqeutte (sp?)
statement/requirement?
If not, should it?
Is the membership of this list presently
On 2 July 2013 20:50, Tobiah t...@tobiah.org wrote:
How do we know whether we have Sometext?
If it's really just a literal 'Sometext', then
just print that when you hit maskit.
Otherwise:
for line in open('file.txt').readlines():
if is_sometext(line):
memory =
On 2 July 2013 21:28, sas4...@gmail.com wrote:
Here I am looking for the line that contains: WORK_MODE_MASK, I want to
print that line as well as the file name above it:
config/meal/governor_mode_config.h
or config/meal/components/source/ceal_PackD_kso_aic_core_config.h.
SO the output
On 2 July 2013 22:43, Surya Kasturi sur...@ieee.org wrote:
Hi all, this seems to be quite stupid question but I am confused..
We set the initial value to 0, +1 for up-vote and -1 for down-vote! nice.
I have a list of bool values True, False (True for up vote, False for
down-vote).. submitted
On 2 July 2013 23:34, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Joshua Landau joshua.landau...@gmail.com writes:
There is not ever a place on this list where you will need to call
someone incompetent.
So even if that term describes their behaviour and manner, you think
no-one should ever
On 2 July 2013 18:43, subhabangal...@gmail.com wrote:
I could not use BeautifulSoup as I did not find an .exe file.
Were you perhaps looking for a .exe file to install BeautifulSoup?
It's quite plausible that a windows user like you might be dazzled at
the idea of a .tar.gz.
I suggest just
On 3 July 2013 01:36, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
I think we've found the root of
the disagreement. I've made my position clear and will let it rest there.
Seconded.
Thanks for caring enough about this community to act in the
interest of keeping it open, considerate, and
On 3 July 2013 01:52, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
If you are a beginner to a programming language, assume that anything
that doesn't work the way you expect is a bug in YOUR code, or YOUR
understanding, not in the language.
Not just beginners. Out of the
On 29 June 2013 15:30, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 29/06/2013 14:44, Dave Angel wrote:
Since you're using the arrogant and buggy GoogleGroups, this
http://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython.
Please don't make comments like this, you'll upset the Python Mailing List
On 1 July 2013 14:14, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Neil Cerutti ne...@norwich.edu wrote:
On 2013-06-30, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple,
and write an insanely complicated - yet
to be insulting)
Nikos
Antoon Pardon
And here are the people who have reminded them to stop:
Steve Simmons
Steven D'Aprano
Andrew Berg
Walter Hurry
rusi
Joshua Landau (me)
So yes, Antoon Pardon and Nikos, please stop. You are not representing
the list. I haven't followed any of the other arguments
On 1 July 2013 18:15, Νίκος ni...@superhost.gr wrote:
Στις 1/7/2013 7:56 μμ, ο/η Joshua Landau έγραψε:
So yes, Antoon Pardon and Nikos, please stop. You are not representing
the list. I haven't followed any of the other arguments, true, but you
two in particular are causing a lot of trouble
On 1 July 2013 19:29, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 1, 2013 10:26:21 PM UTC+5:30, Joshua Landau wrote:
So yes, Antoon Pardon and Nikos, please stop. You are not representing
the list.
This 'and' is type-wrong.
I don't follow.
I haven't followed any of the other
On 1 July 2013 20:12, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Op 01-07-13 18:56, Joshua Landau schreef:
To put things in perspective, these are the people who have been
insulting on this post:
Mark Lawrence (once, probably without meaning to be insulting)
Nikos
Antoon Pardon
On 1 July 2013 20:18, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Op 01-07-13 17:33, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:08:18 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 01-07-13 14:43, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
Νίκος, I am not going to wade through this long, long thread to see
what
On 1 July 2013 20:32, Joel Goldstick joel.goldst...@gmail.com wrote:
I copied the original question so that the rant on the other thread can
continue. Let's keep this thread ontopic
Thank you. I shall do the same below. Unfortunately I don't have high
hopes that any progress will be made on
On 2 July 2013 05:34, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 1, 2013 8:36:53 PM UTC+5:30, Neil Cerutti wrote:
On 2013-07-01, rusi wrote:
1. Kill-filing/spam-filtering are tools for spam.
Nikos is certainly not spamming in the sense of automated
sending out of cooked mail to
On 30 June 2013 07:06, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a bit of a discussion on python-ideas that includes a function
that raises StopIteration. It inspired me to do something stupid, just
to see how easily I could do it...
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Nick Coghlan
On 30 June 2013 15:58, Rick Johnson rantingrickjohn...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris, i'm sorry, but your challenge is decades too late. If you seek
amusement you need look no further than the Python stdlib. If you REALLY want
to be amused, peruse the idlelib -- not only is the code obfuscated, it
On 30 June 2013 18:36, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Pfft! Where's the challenge in that? Let's use an O(n!) algorithm for
sorting -- yes, n factorial -- AND abuse a generator expression for its
side effect. As a bonus, we use itertools, and just for the lulz, I
On 30 June 2013 20:58, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-06-30 18:24, Νίκος wrote:
Στις 29/6/2013 8:00 μμ, ο/η Mark Lawrence έγραψε:
Why this when the approach to Nick the Incompetant Greek has been to
roll out the red carpet?
Your mother is incompetent who raised a brat
On 29 June 2013 03:07, charles benoit feather.duster.kung...@gmail.com wrote:
STUFF
1) You haven't asked a question.
2) You posted your code twice. That makes it look a lot harder and
longer than it really is.
3) Give us a *minimal* reproducible test case. I currently just get:
%~ python2
On 29 June 2013 20:42, Tim Chase t...@thechases.com wrote:
On 2013-06-29 19:19, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Nobody ever asks why Python doesn't let you sort an int, or take
the square of a list...
just to be ornery, you can sort an int:
i = 314159265
''.join(sorted(str(i)))
'112345569'
To be
On 29 June 2013 18:00, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 29/06/2013 17:05, Joshua Landau wrote:
asks for clarification
Why this when the approach to Nick the Incompetant Greek has been to roll
out the red carpet?
I am my own person, and should not be judged by the actions
liable to change.
PEP: XXX
Title: Additional Unpacking Generalizations
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Joshua Landau jos...@landau.ws
Discussions-To: python-id...@python.org
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 29-Jun-2013
Python-Version: 3.4
Post
On 28 June 2013 15:38, Vincent Davis vinc...@vincentdavis.net wrote:
I have a list of a list of integers. The lists are long so i cant really
show an actual example of on of the lists, but I know that they contain only
the integers 1,2,3,4. so for example.
s2 =
On 28 June 2013 19:52, Wayne Werner wa...@waynewerner.com wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013, 8 Dihedral wrote:
KIND OF BORING TO SHOW HOW THE LISP PROGRAMMING
WAS ASSIMULATED BY THE PYTHON COMMUNITY.
OF COURSE PYTHON IS A GOOD LANGUAGE FOR DEVELOPING
ARTIFICIAL INTELEGENT ROBOT PROGRAMS NOT SO
On 28 June 2013 20:35, Joel Goldstick joel.goldst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Landau joshua.landau...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 28 June 2013 19:52, Wayne Werner wa...@waynewerner.com wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013, 8 Dihedral wrote:
KIND OF BORING TO SHOW HOW
On 27 June 2013 00:57, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:09:13 -0700, rusi wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 8:54:56 PM UTC+5:30, Joshua Landau wrote:
On 25 June 2013 22:48, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 25 June 2013 17:47:22 Joshua Landau
On 27 June 2013 13:54, Andrew Berg robotsondr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've begun writing a program with an interactive prompt, and it needs to
parse input from the user. I thought the argparse module would be
great for this, but unfortunately it insists on calling sys.exit() at any
sign of
On 26 June 2013 14:09, Tim jtim.arn...@gmail.com wrote:
I am extending a parser and need to create many classes that are all
subclassed from the same object (defined in an external library). When my
module is loaded I need all the classes to be created with a particular name
but the
201 - 300 of 491 matches
Mail list logo
