Gelonida N gelonida at gmail.com writes:
I wondered whether some of you have a little more insight into what's
going on with PIL.
AFAIK the latest PIL stuff lives here:
hg.effbot.org
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2012-10-02 09:26:56 +, WhisperingWally said:
Gelonida N gelonida at gmail.com writes:
I wondered whether some of you have a little more insight into what's
going on with PIL.
AFAIK the latest PIL stuff lives here:
hg.effbot.org
Certainly true, though somewhat meaningless in the
On 09/25/2012 02:42 PM, alex23 wrote:
On Sep 25, 6:25 pm, Gelonida N gelon...@gmail.com wrote:
So it seems to be safe to use either Christoph' binary PIL distribution
or to use Pillow.
The fact, that pillow is accessable via PyPi / easy_install / PIP pushes
me slightly towards pillow.
I
On Sep 27, 7:44 am, Gelonida N gelon...@gmail.com wrote:
This is what is confusing me.
if I start with a new python and I just install Pillow, then pillow is
imported via
import PIL
so it does not seem to have a separate name space
If I had PIL and pillow installed, then I wouldn't even
On 09/25/2012 01:38 AM, alex23 wrote:
On Sep 25, 6:04 am, Gelonida N gelon...@gmail.com wrote:
This all does not sound very comforting. Why is there no fix on the
official site?
Has a bug been logged about the issue?
The Plone community keeps a fairly up-to-date fork called Pillow,
we've had
On Sep 25, 6:25 pm, Gelonida N gelon...@gmail.com wrote:
So it seems to be safe to use either Christoph' binary PIL distribution
or to use Pillow.
The fact, that pillow is accessable via PyPi / easy_install / PIP pushes
me slightly towards pillow.
I assume it's best to uninstall PIL before
Hi,
I'm trying to migrate a project with legacy code from 2.6 (with PIL
1.1.6) to 2.7 with (PIL 1.1.7)
The SW should run on Windows.
PIL fails with an error concering '_imagingft'
This seems to be a known issue.
http://code.google.com/p/pythonxy/issues/detail?id=300
and the bug was never
On Sep 25, 6:04 am, Gelonida N gelon...@gmail.com wrote:
This all does not sound very comforting. Why is there no fix on the
official site?
Has a bug been logged about the issue?
The Plone community keeps a fairly up-to-date fork called Pillow,
we've had a lot of success using that locally:
On Monday, September 24, 2012 4:38:05 PM UTC-7, alex23 wrote:
On Sep 25, 6:04 am, Gelonida N gelon...@gmail.com wrote:
This all does not sound very comforting. Why is there no fix on the
official site?
Has a bug been logged about the issue?
See issue #1 at
On 2012-09-24 23:38:05 +, alex23 said:
On Sep 25, 6:04 am, Gelonida N gelon...@gmail.com wrote:
This all does not sound very comforting. Why is there no fix on the
official site?
Has a bug been logged about the issue?
The Plone community keeps a fairly up-to-date fork called Pillow,
On Sep 25, 6:04 am, Gelonida N gelon...@gmail.com wrote:
So I'll probably try to install the custom binary, but would like to
know whether anybody has experience with this
build.http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#pil
Sorry, I missed this the first time. I'm using this version
On Sep 25, 11:46 am, Alex Clark acl...@aclark.net wrote:
Actually, I started it for the Plone community, but have recently
broadened the scope (since most of the contributions came from outside
Plone).
You're a saint, thanks for taking this on.
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
