On Nov 4, 5:28 pm, Alan Franzoni doesnotex...@franzoni.invalid
wrote:
On 11/2/09 3:44 PM, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
Being from germany, I can say that we *have* this fragmentation, and
frankly: I don't like it. I prefer my communication via NNTP/ML, and not
with those visually rather noisy
Imagine if no one ever created anything new out of fear of
fragmenting the community. Should we hurl the same accusation at
Guido for fragmenting the programmer community and creating Python,
when perfectly fine languages like Perl, Lisp Smalltalk already
existed?
Creating new things is a part
Saketh wrote:
On Nov 4, 5:28 pm, Alan Franzoni doesnotex...@franzoni.invalid
My small effort to create a place for discussing Python seems to have
sparked a larger discussion than I had anticipated. My intent in
creating Pyfora is not to splinter the community or encroach upon
On Nov 3, 11:37 am, Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-
cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:11:59 -0800, Lorenzo Gatti wrote:
[...]
Are you saying that now that comp.lang.python and stackoverflow exists,
there no more room in the world for any more Python forums?
I think that's
Daniel Fetchinson fetchin...@googlemail.com writes:
Probably this thread is going by far too far :)
Agreed.
--
\德不孤、必有鄰。 (The virtuous are not abandoned, they shall |
`\ surely have neighbours.) —孔夫子 Confucius, 551 BCE – 479 BCE |
_o__)
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:11:59 -0800, Lorenzo Gatti wrote:
On Nov 1, 8:06 am, Saketh saketh.bhamidip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am proud to announce the release of Pyfora (http://pyfora.org), an
online community of Python enthusiasts to supplement comp.lang.python
and #python. While
I was referring to this comment by Ben:
Suggestion: Please don't make efforts to fragment the community.
This IMHO is hostile, because it presupposes that the mere goal of the
OP is fragmenting the community
It presupposes nothing of any goal. It describes a predictable result of
the OP's
Hi everyone,
I am proud to announce the release of Pyfora (http://pyfora.org), an
online community of Python enthusiasts to supplement comp.lang.python
and #python. While the site is small right now, please feel free to
register and post any questions or tips you may have.
I'll feel free
My personal preference would be a link in each sub-paragraph in the official
documentation to a wiki page devoted to that specific aspect of the Python
language. A place were users could augment the documentation by providing
sample code and by expanding out the documentation for those of us
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
I was referring to this comment by Ben:
Suggestion: Please don't make efforts to fragment the community.
This IMHO is hostile, because it presupposes that the mere goal of the
OP is fragmenting the community
It presupposes nothing of any goal. It describes a
Daniel Fetchinson fetchin...@googlemail.com writes:
Probably this thread is going by far too far :)
Ben Finney [ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au] writes:
Agreed.
I was following this discussion first with curiosity and then with
increasing disbelief. As a scientist and a programmer, I always
Valentina Boycheva wrote:
I was following this discussion first with curiosity and then with
increasing disbelief.
So stop following it. Really.
As a scientist and a programmer, I always
considered myself belonging to a group of people who are broad-minded
and task-oriented.
Ditto.
I
On 11/2/09 3:44 PM, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
Being from germany, I can say that we *have* this fragmentation, and
frankly: I don't like it. I prefer my communication via NNTP/ML, and not
with those visually rather noisy and IMHO suboptimal forums. E.g. it
That's right... forums, although more
In article zenim.90683$9f6.106...@twister1.libero.it,
Alan Franzoni doesnotex...@franzoni.invalid wrote:
On 11/2/09 3:44 PM, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
Being from germany, I can say that we *have* this fragmentation, and
frankly: I don't like it. I prefer my communication via NNTP/ML, and not
Alan Franzoni doesnotex...@franzoni.invalid writes:
That's right... forums, although more accessible to all the people
who can't/doesn't want to use specific email or nntp clients, are
quite slow to use.
But I think Ubuntu forums support threads and are kind of channeled
between ML and
Daniel Fetchinson fetchin...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, this is about the right kind of response I think everybody
deserves who puts energy/enthusiasm/effort/time into putting together
a python-related forum.
So what's the right kind of response deserved by those who put energy/
On Nov 1, 8:06 am, Saketh saketh.bhamidip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am proud to announce the release of Pyfora (http://pyfora.org), an
online community of Python enthusiasts to supplement comp.lang.python
and #python. While the site is small right now, please feel free to
register
Kee Nethery wrote:
I just noticed the tag line a place for Python. Looked it up online
(http://pyfora.org/) and it will be interesting to see if it can fill
the void that I experience (no centralized place to post and view user
submitted sample code) in the existing Python community.
There
On 11/3/09, Diez B. Roggisch de...@nospam.web.de wrote:
Daniel Fetchinson schrieb:
If you have any suggestions, let me know -- this is a community
effort!
Suggestion: Please don't make efforts to fragment the community.
When a community grows and consequently its needs also grow, how do
you
Daniel Fetchinson fetchin...@googlemail.com writes:
I was referring to this comment by Ben:
Suggestion: Please don't make efforts to fragment the community.
This IMHO is hostile, because it presupposes that the mere goal of the
OP is fragmenting the community
It presupposes nothing of any
I was referring to this comment by Ben:
Suggestion: Please don't make efforts to fragment the community.
This IMHO is hostile, because it presupposes that the mere goal of the
OP is fragmenting the community
It presupposes nothing of any goal. It describes a predictable result of
the OP's
Since when is the mere suggestion that fragmentation will occur and if
that's a desirable consequence is hostile? The OP is not bound to it,
and I also don't see the tone used by the two immediate answerers being
hostile. Paul might have been terse - but hostility looks different IMHO.
I
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
I was referring to this comment by Ben:
Suggestion: Please don't make efforts to fragment the community.
This IMHO is hostile, because it presupposes that the mere goal of the
OP is fragmenting the community
It presupposes nothing of any goal. It describes a
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:58:30 -, Daniel Fetchinson
fetchin...@googlemail.com wrote:
If yes, we are almost there! In our example the request of A only
makes sense if B is making an effort to fragment the community, in
other words, assuming that A tries to make a meaningful request, A is
If you have any suggestions, let me know -- this is a community
effort!
Suggestion: Please don't make efforts to fragment the community.
When a community grows and consequently its needs also grow, how do
you differentiate natural growth from fragmenting the community?
Same question in
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
If you have any suggestions, let me know -- this is a community
effort!
Suggestion: Please don't make efforts to fragment the community.
When a community grows and consequently its needs also grow, how do
you differentiate natural growth from fragmenting the
I just noticed the tag line a place for Python. Looked it up online (http://pyfora.org/
) and it will be interesting to see if it can fill the void that I
experience (no centralized place to post and view user submitted
sample code) in the existing Python community.
As for user community
Kee Nethery wrote:
I just noticed the tag line a place for Python. Looked it up online
(http://pyfora.org/ ) and it will be interesting to see if it can fill the
void that I experience (no centralized place to post and view user
submitted sample code) in the existing Python community.
ASPN
If you have any suggestions, let me know -- this is a community
effort!
Suggestion: Please don't make efforts to fragment the community.
When a community grows and consequently its needs also grow, how do
you differentiate natural growth from fragmenting the community?
Same question in
Diez B. Roggisch de...@nospam.web.de wrote:
Kee Nethery wrote:
My personal preference would be a link in each sub-paragraph in the
official documentation to a wiki page devoted to that specific aspect
of the Python language. A place were users could augment the
documentation by providing
Daniel Fetchinson schrieb:
If you have any suggestions, let me know -- this is a community
effort!
Suggestion: Please don't make efforts to fragment the community.
When a community grows and consequently its needs also grow, how do
you differentiate natural growth from fragmenting the
Saketh saketh.bhamidip...@gmail.com writes:
I am proud to announce the release of Pyfora (http://pyfora.org), an
online community of Python enthusiasts to supplement comp.lang.python
and #python.
And the reason to want to further fragment Python discussion is
exactly what?
--
I think it's a really good idea :) My accountname is TotempaaltJ
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalidwrote:
Saketh saketh.bhamidip...@gmail.com writes:
I am proud to announce the release of Pyfora (http://pyfora.org), an
online community of Python
Saketh saketh.bhamidip...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have any suggestions, let me know -- this is a community
effort!
I'd like to suggest Pyaspora as a more apropos name ;)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Saketh saketh.bhamidip...@gmail.com writes:
If you have any suggestions, let me know -- this is a community
effort!
Suggestion: Please don't make efforts to fragment the community.
Rather, please direct seekers to the existing forums (the IRC channel,
the Usenet groups and mailing lists)
35 matches
Mail list logo
