In message mailman.2704.1273192642.23598.python-l...@python.org, MRAB
wrote:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 16:38 -0700, Patrick Maupin wrote:
I don't know how this applies to reading other peoples' code, but
recent research shows we learn more from success than failure
In message hs10nb$6o...@panix5.panix.com, Aahz wrote:
My suspicion is that very very few medium/large systems are truly
well-designed.
Conway’s law applies: the product of any human endeavour reflects the
organizational structure that produced it. If the individuals/groups writing
the
Am 07.05.2010 04:48, schrieb TomF:
On 2010-05-06 18:20:02 -0700, Trent Nelson said:
I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
well-designed codebase.
I'll tell you one of the best ways to improve your Python code: attend
one of Raymond Hettinger's Code Clinic workshops
In article 2010050619481239450-tomfsess...@gmailcom,
TomF tomf.sess...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't doubt it. But I'm not really interested in line (micro) level
code issues at the moment. Not that my code couldn't stand being
improved, but I'm more interested in seeing how medium/large OO python
In article 4be132f1$0$20639$426a7...@news.free.fr,
Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid wrote:
The more bad code (mine or not) I have to maintain (or even just read
and understand), the more I pay attention to my own design and code
quality. Sometimes you only
On May 4, 5:34 pm, TomF tomf.sess...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-05-04 07:11:08 -0700, alex23 said:
(I also think there's value to be gained in studying _bad_ code,
too...)
True, although whether that's time well spent is another question.
I don't know how this applies to reading other
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 16:38 -0700, Patrick Maupin wrote:
I don't know how this applies to reading other peoples' code, but
recent research shows we learn more from success than failure
That's good to learn, because for years I have been intentionally
failing in order to learn from it and
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 16:38 -0700, Patrick Maupin wrote:
I don't know how this applies to reading other peoples' code, but
recent research shows we learn more from success than failure
That's good to learn, because for years I have been intentionally
failing in order to
I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
well-designed codebase.
I'll tell you one of the best ways to improve your Python code: attend
one of Raymond Hettinger's Code Clinic workshops at a Python conference
and put some up of your work up on the projector for 20+
On 2010-05-06 18:20:02 -0700, Trent Nelson said:
I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
well-designed codebase.
I'll tell you one of the best ways to improve your Python code: attend
one of Raymond Hettinger's Code Clinic workshops at a Python conference
and put some
TomF a écrit :
On 2010-05-04 07:11:08 -0700, alex23 said:
(snip)
(I also think there's value to be gained in studying _bad_ code,
too...)
True, although whether that's time well spent is another question.
The more bad code (mine or not) I have to maintain (or even just read
and
TomF a écrit :
I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
well-designed codebase. Someone (not a python programmer) suggested
Django. I realize that Django is popular, but can someone comment on
whether its code is well-designed and worth studying?
Carl makes some
TomF tomf.sess...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
well-designed codebase. Someone (not a python programmer) suggested
Django. I realize that Django is popular, but can someone comment on
whether its code is well-designed and worth studying?
From: alex23
(I also think there's value to be gained in studying _bad_ code,
too...)
Oh, very true. And not just true for python. But, only if an 'expoert'
points out why it is bad and provides an alternative. And saying things
like, it isn't pyhonic or that such and such is a more
On May 4, 12:37 am, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.
42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid wrote:
TomF a écrit :
I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
well-designed codebase. Someone (not a python programmer) suggested
Django. I realize that Django is popular, but
Thanks to everyone for their comments.
On 2010-05-04 07:11:08 -0700, alex23 said:
TomF tomf.sess...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
well-designed codebase. Someone (not a python programmer) suggested
Django. I realize that Django is popular,
On May 3, 12:24 pm, TomF tomf.sess...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested in improving my python design by studying a large,
well-designed codebase. Someone (not a python programmer) suggested
Django. I realize that Django is popular, but can someone comment on
whether its code is well-designed
17 matches
Mail list logo
