Ned Batchelder n...@nedbatchelder.com writes:
On 1/28/14 2:19 AM, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Different, but a little bit related. The work
which is done actually on the possibility (not
implemented but alreay realized) to colorize (style)
the different graphemes of a glyph is very
On 28/01/2014 07:19, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Different, but a little bit related. The work
which is done actually on the possibility (not
implemented but alreay realized) to colorize (style)
the different graphemes of a glyph is very interesting.
Python with its absurd Flexible String
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:19:03 -0800, wxjmfauth wrote:
Different, but a little bit related. The work which is done actually on
the possibility (not implemented but alreay realized) to colorize
(style) the different graphemes of a glyph is very interesting.
Python with its absurd Flexible
On 1/28/14 2:19 AM, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Different, but a little bit related. The work
which is done actually on the possibility (not
implemented but alreay realized) to colorize (style)
the different graphemes of a glyph is very interesting.
Python with its absurd Flexible String
On 01/28/2014 12:38 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
JMF, seriously, stop it. You've convinced no one because you have no
convincing arguments.
It's obnoxious to continue to make this claim. Stop it. Please.
If you want to try to convince someone, convince me. Write to me
offline:
Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com writes:
I think this might have value, especially if to could bounce back and forth
between both schemes. Is anyone aware of tools like this for Python? Bonus
points for pointers to an Emacs implementation.
There has been a recent thread on some emacs group about
On 27/01/2014 01:46, Skip Montanaro wrote:
What it is doing is color coding user-supplied identifiers, with different
color for each one. I found that confusing to read.
I think it would take some time to get used to, and I don't think it
would be the only way I'd like to view my program.
I
On 01/26/2014 06:54 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
That said, though, I grew up without syntax highlighting of any sort,
and didn't think it particularly important; but now that I have
editors with all those sorts of features, I do find them handy.
Same here, except I'd replace
Skip Montanaro wrote:
My son sent me a link to an essay about highlighting program data instead
of keywords:
https://medium.com/p/3a6db2743a1e/
I think this might have value, especially if to could bounce back and
forth between both schemes. Is anyone aware of tools like this for Python?
Different, but a little bit related. The work
which is done actually on the possibility (not
implemented but alreay realized) to colorize (style)
the different graphemes of a glyph is very interesting.
Python with its absurd Flexible String Representation
just become a no go for the kind of task.
On 1/26/2014 7:31 PM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
My son sent me a link to an essay about highlighting program data
instead of keywords:
https://medium.com/p/3a6db2743a1e/
What it is doing is color coding user-supplied identifiers, with
different color for each one. I found that confusing to read.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
The only use I can see for this is to track the usage of a particular name,
but that would be better done by just highlighting one name at a time.
In SciTE, I can put the cursor on a word and hit Ctrl-F3 to find other
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
The only use I can see for this is to track the usage of a particular name,
but that would be better done by just highlighting one name at a time.
In
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:31:49 -0600, Skip Montanaro wrote:
My son sent me a link to an essay about highlighting program data
instead of keywords:
https://medium.com/p/3a6db2743a1e/
I think this might have value, especially if to could bounce back and
forth between both schemes.
Hmmm, I'm
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Hmmm, I'm not convinced, but then I wasn't convinced by syntax
highlighting either until I had used it for a while. (I still think it's
a nice-to-have rather than a must-have.)
It's definitely just a
What it is doing is color coding user-supplied identifiers, with different
color for each one. I found that confusing to read.
I think it would take some time to get used to, and I don't think it
would be the only way I'd like to view my program.
I think an interactive pylint (or pyflakes or
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes:
Hmmm, I'm not convinced, but then I wasn't convinced by syntax
highlighting either until I had used it for a while. (I still think
it's a nice-to-have rather than a must-have.)
I wouldn't rate syntax highlighting a must-have. But I
In article mailman.6011.1390783954.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
That said, though, I grew up without syntax highlighting of any sort,
and didn't think it particularly important; but now that I have
editors with all those sorts of features, I do find
On 1/26/2014 8:29 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:31:49 -0600, Skip Montanaro wrote:
My son sent me a link to an essay about highlighting program data
instead of keywords:
https://medium.com/p/3a6db2743a1e/
I think this might have value, especially if to could bounce back
On 1/26/2014 8:46 PM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
I think an interactive pylint (or pyflakes or frosty) type capability
would be useful, highlighting a subset of the messages it produces,
like variables which were assigned but never used, or using undefined
variables. It might be best supported by
20 matches
Mail list logo
