On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Paul Rudin wrote:
> Chris Angelico writes:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:12 AM, RCU wrote:
>>> Dave,
>>> Thanks for the reply.
>>> The script was originally edited on Windows with proper \r\n endings,
>>
>> It's worth noting that many Windows-based edi
Chris Angelico writes:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:12 AM, RCU wrote:
>> Dave,
>> Thanks for the reply.
>> The script was originally edited on Windows with proper \r\n endings,
>
> It's worth noting that many Windows-based editors and interpreters are
> quite happy with \n line endings.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:12 AM, RCU wrote:
> Dave,
> Thanks for the reply.
> The script was originally edited on Windows with proper \r\n endings,
It's worth noting that many Windows-based editors and interpreters are
quite happy with \n line endings. You may be able to save yourself
s
Dave,
Thanks for the reply.
The script was originally edited on Windows with proper \r\n endings, but the
PythonTidy script somehow does the doubling (I guess it assumes UNIX format only), i.e.,
\r\r\n . So indeed, that's kind of messy (and the Python Lang Reference specifies clearly
On 12/12/2012 2:10 PM, RCU wrote:
I would like to report a parser bug manifesting on Python 2.5, 2.7
(but not on 2.2) and 3.3.
You are not the first to erroneously attribute a problem to Python
itself. But seriously, the interpreter itself is so thoroughly tested on
a daily basis that yo
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:10 PM, RCU wrote:
> With this occasion I would like to ask also what are the limits of the
> Python 2.x and 3.x parser. Where can I find what are the limits on the
> size/lines of the parsed script?
The Python Language Reference is probably what you're looking for:
h
On 12/12/2012 02:10 PM, RCU wrote:
> Hello.
> I would like to report a parser bug manifesting on Python 2.5, 2.7
> (but not on 2.2) and 3.3.
> Please see the attached script.
> Basically this bug appeared after applying PythonTidy on a valid
> script.
>
> More exactly, when runnin
Your program is doing what you asked it to do. It finds the
first table with class 'bp_ergebnis_tab_info'. Then it ignores
that results. Then it finds the first "td" item in the document,
and prints the contents of that. Then it exits. What did
you want it to do?
Try this. It prints o
I've no opinion.
>> I'm just struggling with BeautifulSoup myself, finding it one of the
>> toughest libs I've seen ;-)
>
> Really? While I'm by no means an expert, I find it very easy to work with.
> It's very well
> structured IMHO.
I think the cause lies in the documentation.
The PySide docume
On 11.12.2010 22:38, Stef Mientki wrote:
On 11-12-2010 17:24, Martin Kaspar wrote:
Hello commnity
i am new to Python and to Beatiful Soup also!
It is told to be a great tool to parse and extract content. So here i
am...:
I want to take the content of a-tag of a table in a html
document. For ex
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 22:38:43 +0100, Stef Mientki wrote:
[snip]
> So the simplest solution I came up with:
>
> Text = """
>
>
>
> This is a sample text
>
>
>
> This is the second sample text
>
>
>
On 11-12-2010 17:24, Martin Kaspar wrote:
> Hello commnity
>
> i am new to Python and to Beatiful Soup also!
> It is told to be a great tool to parse and extract content. So here i
> am...:
>
> I want to take the content of a -tag of a table in a html
> document. For example, i have this table
>
>
try using lxml ... its very useful
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Martin Kaspar wrote:
> Hello commnity
>
> i am new to Python and to Beatiful Soup also!
> It is told to be a great tool to parse and extract content. So here i
> am...:
>
> I want to take the content of a -tag of a table in a h
Robert Kern wrote:
Jeremiah
H. Savage wrote:
To use pymol and numpy together, I now do the following:
To ~/.bashrc add:
PYMOL_PATH=/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/pymol
export PYMOL_PATH
Then I can do the following in python:
import numpy
numpy.save('123',numpy.arra
Jeremiah H. Savage wrote:
To use pymol and numpy together, I now do the following:
To ~/.bashrc add:
PYMOL_PATH=/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/pymol
export PYMOL_PATH
Then I can do the following in python:
import numpy
numpy.save('123',numpy.array([1,2,3]))
numpy.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
>
>
> Jeremiah wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm fairly new to python (version 2.5.4), and am writing a program
>> which uses both pymol (version 1.2r1) and numpy (version 1.3.0) from
>> debian.
>>
>> It appears that when I add pymol to $PYTHONPATH, t
Jeremiah wrote:
Hello,
I'm fairly new to python (version 2.5.4), and am writing a program
which uses both pymol (version 1.2r1) and numpy (version 1.3.0) from
debian.
It appears that when I add pymol to $PYTHONPATH, that parser.expr() is
no longer available, and so I am unable to use numpy.lo
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:41:07 -0800, Jeremiah wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm fairly new to python (version 2.5.4), and am writing a program which
> uses both pymol (version 1.2r1) and numpy (version 1.3.0) from debian.
>
> It appears that when I add pymol to $PYTHONPATH, that parser.expr() is
> no longe
Jeremiah wrote:
However, a problem arises once $PYTHONPATH includes the pymol
directory. To use the pymol api, I add the following to ~/.bashrc:
PYMOL_PATH=/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/pymol
export PYMOL_PATH
PYTHONPATH=$PYMOL_PATH
export PYTHONPATH
Don't change your PYTHONPATH li
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
Do you mean the simpleparser project in Sourceforge?
http://simpleparse.sourceforge.net/
I thought this to be one of the most famous
and useful Python parsers, because of its
combination of simplicity and speed.
Anyway, it is *very* good, and not having
a version for
Kay Schluehr wrote:
> You'll most likely need a GLR parser.
i'm not sure why you think this. as far as i can tell, the OP needs a
parser that is suitable for whatever grammar they find (and the grammar
will probably be written for a particular parser, which may not be GLR).
however, if you are s
On 2 Mrz., 23:14, Clarendon wrote:
> Thank you, Lie and Andrew for your help.
>
> I have studied NLTK quite closely but its parsers seem to be only for
> demo. It has a very limited grammar set, and even a parser that is
> supposed to be "large" does not have enough grammar to cover common
> words
En Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:39:19 -0200, Alan G Isaac
escribió:
This reminds me: the SimpleParse developers ran into
some troubles porting to Python 2.6. It would be
great if someone could give them a hand.
Do you mean the simpleparser project in Sourceforge? Latest alpha released
in 2003? Or
This reminds me: the SimpleParse developers ran into
some troubles porting to Python 2.6. It would be
great if someone could give them a hand.
Alan Isaac
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Clarendon wrote:
[...]
> I need to parse a large amount of texts collected from the web (around
> a couple hundred sentences at a time) very quickly, so I need a parser
> with a broad scope of grammar, enough to cover all these texts. This
> is what I mean by 'random'.
so the most important things
On 2009-03-02 16:14, Clarendon wrote:
Thank you, Lie and Andrew for your help.
I have studied NLTK quite closely but its parsers seem to be only for
demo. It has a very limited grammar set, and even a parser that is
supposed to be "large" does not have enough grammar to cover common
words like "
Thank you, Lie and Andrew for your help.
I have studied NLTK quite closely but its parsers seem to be only for
demo. It has a very limited grammar set, and even a parser that is
supposed to be "large" does not have enough grammar to cover common
words like "I".
I need to parse a large amount of t
if this is for natural language texts you may want to look at
http://www.nltk.org/
andrew
Clarendon wrote:
> Can somebody recommend a good parser that can be used in Python
> programs? I need a parser with large grammar that can cover a large
> amount of random texts.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
Clarendon wrote:
> Can somebody recommend a good parser that can be used in Python
> programs?
Do you want parser that can parse python source code or parser that
works in python? If the latter, pyparsing is a popular choice. Ply is
another. There are many choice:
http://nedbatchelder.com/text/pyt
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:30:14 -0700, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>tuxlover wrote:
>> Hello everyone
>>
>> I have to write a verilog parser in python for a class project. I was
>> wondering if all you folks could advise me on choosing the right python
>> parser module. I am not comfortab
tuxlover wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> I have to write a verilog parser in python for a class project. I was
> wondering if all you folks could advise me on choosing the right python
> parser module. I am not comfortable with lex/yacc and as a result find
> myself strugging with any module which use
I recently was successful using pyparsing after messing around with ply
for a few hours. See my blog for more details (
http://panela.blog-city.com/icfp_contest_implementation_in_python_notes.htm
).
I personally corresponded with the author and he was very helpful as
well, giving my useful critiq
tuxlover wrote:
> I have to write a verilog parser in python for a class project. I was
> wondering if all you folks could advise me on choosing the right python
> parser module. I am not comfortable with lex/yacc and as a result find
> myself strugging with any module which use lex/yacc syntax/phi
33 matches
Mail list logo
