On 3 April 2017 at 19:55, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> I didn't see you calling out Rick for his prejudice against those who aren't
> American, his absurd belief that "most" people are satisfied with ASCII,
Hmm... that is interesting.
Everyone has some beliefs...
If I
On Saturday, 1 April 2017 17:01:03 UTC+1, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 12:17 pm, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
> > Most people just quietly change the filename and move on
>
>
> There are over a billion people in China, almost a billion more in India,
> about 140 million people in
On Sunday, April 2, 2017 at 3:49:43 PM UTC-5, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 02 April 2017 12:26:40 Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 04:41 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > > On 4/1/2017 12:00 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> > > >
> > > > example of the Ugly American.
> > >
> > > As an
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
> D'Aprano, are you still stewing because Donald J Trump
> spanked Hillary's jumbo sized bottom like an unruly
> stepchild? You poor widdle partisian hack. I almost feel
> sorry for you.
>
> [snip massively long
On Sunday, April 2, 2017 at 11:26:50 AM UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 04:41 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 4/1/2017 12:00 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
example of the Ugly American.
As an American I resent your promotion and perpetuation of an ugly
ethno-centric stereotype.
I'm
On Sunday, April 2, 2017 at 11:26:50 AM UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 04:41 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > On 4/1/2017 12:00 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> >
> > > example of the Ugly American.
> >
> > As an American I resent your promotion and perpetuation of
> > an ugly
On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 9:32:17 PM UTC-5, MRAB wrote:
> Sometimes he mentions MUDs, sometimes he mentions Pike, but at least he
> doesn't rant.
I have not even _begun_ to rant. Yet...
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 08:31 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
[...]
> I refrained because it would be off-topic and a diversion from my point:
> all bigotry is inappropriate here on this list,
Indeed it is not appropriate. But calling out bigotry is not itself bigotry.
I hope you agree with that.
If not,
On 4/2/2017 12:26 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 04:41 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 4/1/2017 12:00 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
example of the Ugly American.
As an American I resent your promotion and perpetuation of an ugly
ethno-centric stereotype.
I'm glad you didn't try to
On Sunday 02 April 2017 12:26:40 Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 04:41 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > On 4/1/2017 12:00 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> >> example of the Ugly American.
> >
> > As an American I resent your promotion and perpetuation of an ugly
> > ethno-centric stereotype.
>
>
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 04:41 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 4/1/2017 12:00 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> example of the Ugly American.
>
> As an American I resent your promotion and perpetuation of an ugly
> ethno-centric stereotype.
I'm glad you didn't try to describe it as a *unfair* or
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 9:12 PM, bartc wrote:
> But people, when unrestrained, will /always/ want to do something that may
> not be practical. For example, why bother with the separate concepts
> 'filename' and 'file'; just have the file contents /as/ the filename! If
> there are
On 01/04/2017 22:35, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Chris Angelico :
there is no way within Python to have a string that can represent two
strings, which is what directory separators do.
Really? Try:
>>> repr(("a", "b"))
"('a', 'b')"
There! A string that represents two
Christian Gollwitzer :
> Am 01.04.17 um 19:38 schrieb Steve D'Aprano:
>> Next: convince keyboard manufacturers to move the caret from SHIFT-6
>> to a plain, unshifted key. Buggared if I'm going to hit shift every
>> time I want to use an absolute path...
>
> ...which is reality
Am 01.04.17 um 19:38 schrieb Steve D'Aprano:
^home^steve^document.txt
I'm sure I'd get used to it in a few years...
Next: convince keyboard manufacturers to move the caret from SHIFT-6 to a
plain, unshifted key. Buggared if I'm going to hit shift every time I want
to use an absolute path...
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 4/1/2017 12:00 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> example of the Ugly American.
>
>
> As an American I resent your promotion and perpetuation of an ugly
> ethno-centric stereotype.
There are ugly Americans and there are
On 4/1/2017 12:00 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
example of the Ugly American.
As an American I resent your promotion and perpetuation of an ugly
ethno-centric stereotype.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 12:42 pm, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 9:18:14 PM UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> [...]
>> Even India has a literacy rate of 74%, which is not far off
>> the functional literacy rate in the US of 86%.
>>
>>
On 04/01/2017 08:18 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>> And yet America continues to be emulated by 100% of the world.
>
> Well, at least 100% of the world that you know of. Which isn't saying much.
I plonked RR a long time ago, but this little doozie requires a reply!
Having just traveled half way
On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 9:18:14 PM UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
[...]
> Even India has a literacy rate of 74%, which is not far off
> the functional literacy rate in the US of 86%.
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/06/illiteracy-rate_n_3880355.html
And your source is the HuffPo?
On 2017-04-02 02:38, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 3:08:20 PM UTC-5, Mikhail V wrote:
On 1 April 2017 at 06:38, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 9:14:54 AM UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> > - and making band names look ǨØØĻ
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 09:11 am, Rick Johnson wrote:
> The majority of the populations you reference are
> illiterate.
/face-palm
The majority of Chinese and Japanese are illiterate. Really?
Even India has a literacy rate of 74%, which is not far off the functional
literacy rate in the US of 86%.
On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 3:08:20 PM UTC-5, Mikhail V wrote:
> On 1 April 2017 at 06:38, Rick Johnson wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 9:14:54 AM UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > > - and making band names look ǨØØĻ and annoy old fuddy-
> > > duddies.
>
On 2 April 2017 at 02:01, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
>> On 2 April 2017 at 00:22, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
For
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
> On 2 April 2017 at 00:22, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
>>> For multiple-alphabet rendering I will use some
>>> custom text format, e.g.
On 2 April 2017 at 00:22, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
>> For multiple-alphabet rendering I will use some
>> custom text format, e.g. with tags
>>
On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 11:01:03 AM UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 12:17 pm, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
> > Most people just quietly change the filename and move on
>
> There are over a billion people in China, almost a billion
> more in India, about 140 million people in
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
> For multiple-alphabet rendering I will use some
> custom text format, e.g. with tags
>
On 1 April 2017 at 18:00, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 12:17 pm, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
>> Most people just quietly change the filename and move on
>
>
> There are over a billion people in China, almost a billion more in India,
> about 140 million people
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Chris Angelico writes:
>>Yes it can; however, there is no way within Python to have a string
>>that can represent two strings, which is what directory separators do.
>
> To represent two strings,
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Chris Angelico :
>
>> there is no way within Python to have a string that can represent two
>> strings, which is what directory separators do.
>
> Really? Try:
>
>>>> repr(("a", "b"))
>"('a', 'b')"
On 1 April 2017 at 22:57, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
>> On 1 April 2017 at 06:38, Rick Johnson wrote:
>>> On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 9:14:54 AM UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>>
Chris Angelico :
> there is no way within Python to have a string that can represent two
> strings, which is what directory separators do.
Really? Try:
>>> repr(("a", "b"))
"('a', 'b')"
There! A string that represents two strings.
Note, however, that Python programs
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Chris Angelico :
>
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>> A far more convenient escaping scheme could have been devised for
>>> pathnames.
>>
>> Definitely. We
Chris Angelico :
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> A far more convenient escaping scheme could have been devised for
>> pathnames.
>
> Definitely. We should treat file names like domain names. "Bücher.ch"
> gets represented internally
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> You are stuck with the axiom that pathname and its representation are
> one and the same thing.
>
> URI's make the distinction clear. Say you wanted to express a resource
>
>päätyö/2
>
> as part of a URI. URIs are to
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
> On 1 April 2017 at 06:38, Rick Johnson wrote:
>> On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 9:14:54 AM UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>
>>> - and making band names look ǨØØĻ and annoy old fuddy-
>>> duddies.
Steve D'Aprano :
> But if I could borrow Guido's time machine, I'd go back and convince
> the file system people to use ^ as the record separator, rather than
> slash or backslash or colon. Caret is *much* less likely to be useful
> in file names than forward slash
On 1 April 2017 at 06:38, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 9:14:54 AM UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>> - and making band names look ǨØØĻ and annoy old fuddy-
>> duddies.
>
> So now we've even included graffiti artists in our little
> "inclusivity
On 2017-04-01 17:43, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Steve D'Aprano :
Open your eyes, there is a whole world past the borders of your insular,
close-minded little country. 95% of the world is not American, and there
are millions of Americans who want to use non-ASCII
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Steve D'Aprano
wrote:
> Or, for Windows, I suppose a dozen or so more characters:
>
> https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Invalid-characters-in-file-or-folder-names-or-invalid-
>
On 2017-04-01 19:43, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> It would be nice to be able to use a / in my file names. Funny
> enough, I'm allowed to use a zillion unprintable characters in my
> file names but no slashes allowed.
>
> Example:
>
>results-Q2/2017.json
You can:
$ touch $(/usr/bin/printf
On 2017-04-02 03:09, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> *Whatever* record separator you choose to use, whether it is
> slash / or backslash \ or colon : or Ctrl-^ RS or U+113A HANGUL
> CHOSEONG SIOS-PHIEUPH, you can't *also* use it as a non-record
> separator.
Well, one could use 0x1C (FS=File Separator)
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 03:18 am, Alain Ketterlin wrote:
> Marko Rauhamaa writes:
>
>> It would be nice to be able to use a / in my file names. Funny enough,
>> I'm allowed to use a zillion unprintable characters in my file names but
>> no slashes allowed.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>>
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 03:08 am, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Chris Angelico :
>
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>> It would be nice to be able to use a / in my file names. Funny
>>> enough, I'm allowed to use a zillion unprintable characters
Marko Rauhamaa writes:
> It would be nice to be able to use a / in my file names. Funny enough,
> I'm allowed to use a zillion unprintable characters in my file names but
> no slashes allowed.
>
> Example:
>
>results-Q2/2017.json
Use U+2215 (DIVISION SLASH).
I have tried
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Steve D'Aprano :
>>
>>> Open your eyes, there is a whole world past the borders of your insular,
>>> close-minded
Chris Angelico :
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> It would be nice to be able to use a / in my file names. Funny
>> enough, I'm allowed to use a zillion unprintable characters in my
>> file names but no slashes allowed.
>>
>> Example:
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 02:43 am, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Steve D'Aprano :
>
>> Open your eyes, there is a whole world past the borders of your insular,
>> close-minded little country. 95% of the world is not American, and there
>> are millions of Americans who want to use
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Steve D'Aprano :
>
>> Open your eyes, there is a whole world past the borders of your insular,
>> close-minded little country. 95% of the world is not American, and there
>> are millions of
Steve D'Aprano :
> Open your eyes, there is a whole world past the borders of your insular,
> close-minded little country. 95% of the world is not American, and there
> are millions of Americans who want to use non-ASCII characters in their
> file names, even non-Latin
On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 12:17 pm, Rick Johnson wrote:
> Most people just quietly change the filename and move on
There are over a billion people in China, almost a billion more in India,
about 140 million people in Russia, nearly 130 million people in Japan, 250
million in Indonesia, about 290
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
>> - distinguishing between different letters of the alphabet,
>> like dotted-i and dotless-ı (or ı and ı-with-a-dot, if you
>> prefer), or a and å;
>
> Sounds like the "encoding in question" could use a few more
>
On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 9:14:54 AM UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 03:21 pm, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 2:53:49 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
> >> > On 26 March
On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 2:58:53 AM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 20:53:35 -0700, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 1:21:18 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Steve D'Aprano
> >>
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
> On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 12:43:59 AM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Except that it doesn't actually take very much work to call
>> on someone else's library, which is what you get when you
>> use Unicode
On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 12:43:59 AM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Except that it doesn't actually take very much work to call
> on someone else's library, which is what you get when you
> use Unicode properly. (At least, assuming you're using a
> decent language like Python, which comes
On 30/03/17 16:57, Mikhail V wrote:
Steve, it is not bad to want to spell your name using spelling which
was taught you in the school. But it is bad to stay in illusion that there
is something good in using accents.
*plonk*
--
Rhodri James *-* Kynesim Ltd
--
On 30 March 2017 at 16:14, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 03:21 pm, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 2:53:49 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
>>> > On 26 March
On 03/30/2017 08:14 AM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>> Why is it my responsibiliy to encode my text with
>> pronuciation tutorials? Are we adults here or what?
>
> Now you're just being absurd.
Ahh yes, good old RR with his reductio ad absurdum fallacies when he's
lost the argument.
--
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Steve D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:25 am, Mikhail V wrote:
>
>> Call me a bigot
>
> Okay. You're a bigot.
+1 QOTD
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:25 am, Mikhail V wrote:
> Call me a bigot
Okay. You're a bigot.
--
Steve
“Cheer up,” they said, “things could be worse.” So I cheered up, and sure
enough, things got worse.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 03:21 pm, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 2:53:49 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
>> > On 26 March 2017 at 20:10, Steve D'Aprano
>> > wrote:
>> >> On
On 30 March 2017 at 07:43, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Rick Johnson
> wrote:
>> On Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 2:53:49 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Mikhail V
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
> On Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 2:53:49 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
>> > On 26 March 2017 at 20:10, Steve D'Aprano
On Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 6:42:36 PM UTC-5, Mikhail V wrote:
> And all text I currently read on my monitor are prerendered
> bitmaps, refined manually for frequently used sizes, and
> that is how it should be made. IOW there are much more
> important aspects than the ability to scale a text
On Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 2:53:49 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
> > On 26 March 2017 at 20:10, Steve D'Aprano
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 03:57 am, Mikhail V wrote:
> I generally
On Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 1:21:18 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Steve D'Aprano
> wrote:
> [...] So, for instance, Eryk Sun commented that my rounded
> box example didn't render correctly in all fonts - but in
> the future, a new
On 2017-03-27 02:37, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > In DOS, (I don't remember if in all versions or only some)
> > one could do all this and this opens very rich possibilities for
> > approximating of objects with tiles. The only limitations
> > that one uses 255 tiles, but even this enables to build
>
On 26 March 2017 at 21:53, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
>> On 26 March 2017 at 20:10, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>>> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 03:57 am, Mikhail V wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> In actual UCS-2, surrogates are entirely disallowed; in UTF-16, they *must* be
> correctly paired.
Strictly-speaking UCS-2 disallows codes that aren't defined by the
standard, but the kernel couldn't be that
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
> On 26 March 2017 at 20:10, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 03:57 am, Mikhail V wrote:
>>
>> [...]
> And more important: can one use binary (bitmap) fonts in default modern
>
On 26 March 2017 at 20:10, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 03:57 am, Mikhail V wrote:
>
> [...]
And more important: can one use binary (bitmap) fonts in default modern
linux console? If yes, can one patch them with custom tiles at
the
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:37 AM, eryk sun wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> The Windows console can render any character in the BMP, but it
>>> requires configuring font linking for fallback fonts. It's Windows, so
>>> of
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 5:49 PM, eryk sun wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Rounded corners?
>>
>> ╭─┬─╮
>> ├─┼─┤
>> ╰─┴─╯
>
> This prints fine in the Windows console with Consolas as the font, but
> the older Courier New and
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> The Windows console can render any character in the BMP, but it
>> requires configuring font linking for fallback fonts. It's Windows, so
>> of course the supported UTF format is UTF-16. The console's UTF-8
>> support
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:10 AM, Steve D'Aprano
wrote:
>> And for own standalone app, I would not use any TTF or
>> anything vector-based font, since why?
>
> Right, because your users will *love* to see their native language displayed
> in a crappy bitmapped font with
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Steve D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 02:37 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Just use Unicode. Everything else, these days, is a subset of Unicode
>> anyway. Unless you're stuck on the default Windows shell/terminal, you
>> should
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 03:57 am, Mikhail V wrote:
[...]
>>> And more important: can one use binary (bitmap) fonts in default modern
>>> linux console? If yes, can one patch them with custom tiles at
>>> the application start?
>>
>> If you really need something completely custom, it's not text any
>>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:38 AM, eryk sun wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> Just use Unicode. Everything else, these days, is a subset of Unicode
>> anyway. Unless you're stuck on the default Windows shell/terminal, you
>>
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Rounded corners?
>
> ╭─┬─╮
> ├─┼─┤
> ╰─┴─╯
This prints fine in the Windows console with Consolas as the font, but
the older Courier New and Lucida Console fonts lack glyphs for the
rounded corners.
--
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 02:37 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
Why? IIRC I can do good pseudographics on linux only with extended
unicode character sets, so yes it is possible, is that what you mean?
>>>
>>> No. The same
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> Just use Unicode. Everything else, these days, is a subset of Unicode
> anyway. Unless you're stuck on the default Windows shell/terminal, you
> should be able to use UTF-8 everywhere and have the entire Unicode
> range
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
> On 26 March 2017 at 17:37, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
> Why? IIRC I can do good pseudographics on linux only with extended
>
On 26 March 2017 at 17:37, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
Why? IIRC I can do good pseudographics on linux only with extended
unicode character sets, so yes it is possible, is that what you mean?
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:37 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Just use Unicode. Everything else, these days, is a subset of Unicode
> anyway.
(Caveat: There are a few counter-examples to my statement, but I very
much doubt that someone who's talking about PC OEM graphics is going
to
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
>>> Why? IIRC I can do good pseudographics on linux only with extended
>>> unicode character sets, so yes it is possible, is that what you mean?
>>
>> No. The same ASCII character set that was available in DOS is
>>
On 26 March 2017 at 16:28, Wildman via Python-list
wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 15:18:06 +0200, Mikhail V wrote:
>
>> On 26 March 2017 at 06:16, Wildman via Python-list
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:15:14 +0100, Mikhail V wrote:
>>>
And
88 matches
Mail list logo