On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 7:06:02 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:37:00 -0700, rocky wrote:
>
>
>
> > So again I come to import_relative,
>
> > http://code.google.com/p/pyimport-relative/. And again, I wish this
>
> > package didn't have to exist.
>
>
>
>
>
> I
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:33:54 -0400, Jerry Hill wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:49 PM, rocky wrote:
>>> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:12:49 -0500, Fabian von Romberg wrote:
>>> > I have a package name collections and inside of my package I want to
>
>> I find this kind of thing sad: it feels to me t
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:37:00 -0700, rocky wrote:
> And again, I get the impression that for the use case asked about, there
> isn't much ambiguity. If I am in mypackage.foo and I want to access
> mypackage.collections I should be able to say something like that
> without ambiguity or that much inf
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Phil Connell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:37:00AM -0700, rocky wrote:
> > And again, I get the impression that for the use case asked about, there
> isn't much ambiguity. If I am in mypackage.foo and I want to access
> mypackage.collections I should be able
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:37:00AM -0700, rocky wrote:
> And again, I get the impression that for the use case asked about, there
> isn't much ambiguity. If I am in mypackage.foo and I want to access
> mypackage.collections I should be able to say something like that without
> ambiguity or that
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 12:33:54 PM UTC-4, Jerry Hill wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:49 PM, rocky wrote:
>
> >> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:12:49 -0500, Fabian von Romberg wrote:
>
> >> > I have a package name collections and inside of my package I want to
>
>
>
> > I find this kind of thin
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:49 PM, rocky wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:12:49 -0500, Fabian von Romberg wrote:
>> > I have a package name collections and inside of my package I want to
> I find this kind of thing sad: it feels to me that programmers are working
> around somewhat arbitrary and c
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 3:04:44 AM UTC-4, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 3/24/2013 7:12 PM, Fabian von Romberg wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > I have a package name collections and inside of my package I want to
>
> > import the collections package from the standard library, but there
>
> > is name c
On 3/24/2013 7:12 PM, Fabian von Romberg wrote:
Hi,
I have a package name collections and inside of my package I want to
import the collections package from the standard library, but there
is name conflicts.
Yes. I strongly advise against trying to do this.
How do I import explicitly from th
On Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:27:56 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:12:49 -0500, Fabian von Romberg wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > I have a package name collections and inside of my package I want to
>
> > import the collections package from the standard library, bu
Hi Steven,
thanks a lot for the explanation.
I will keep in mind not to use names for my modules that can shadow the
standard library.
Regards,
Fabian
On 03/24/2013 07:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:12:49 -0500, Fabian von Romberg wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a package
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:12:49 -0500, Fabian von Romberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a package name collections and inside of my package I want to
> import the collections package from the standard library, but there is
> name conflicts.
>
> How do I import explicitly from the standard library?
You c
Hi,
I have a package name collections and inside of my package I want to import the
collections package from the standard library, but there is name conflicts.
How do I import explicitly from the standard library?
Im working on Python3.3
Thanks in advance and regards,
Fabian
--
http://mail.p
13 matches
Mail list logo
