sibly non-pythonic topic and go read another book or a few hundred so
when it comes up again ...
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Thomas Passin
Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2023 5:04 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Which more Pythonic - self.__class__ or type(self)
Nope. No consensus.
I’d use self.__class__ . Seems more explicit and direct to me.
From: Python-list on
behalf of Ian Pilcher
Date: Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 4:17 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Which more Pythonic - self.__class__ or type(self)?
*** Attention: This is an external
t: Saturday, March 4, 2023 1:09 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Which more Pythonic - self.__class__ or type(self)?
On 3/4/2023 2:47 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
Even before Python existed there was the adage "a real programmer
can write FORTRAN in any language", indicating that id
.
But I note some idioms catch on and some are imposed and some become almost
moot. I am not sure which aspects of C++ have changed drastically and may go
re-study the modern version as I was a very early adoptee within AT&T and saw
changes even back then.
But I consider something like
native language(s).
I am sure some books along these lines have already been written!
Who wants to collaborate?
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of dn via Python-list
Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2023 1:26 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Which more Pythonic - self
on late and found an
expanding language with way too many ways to do anything and can choose. But
I claim that too is pythonic!
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Thomas Passin
Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2023 1:09 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Which more Pythonic - se
On 2023-03-04 12:38:22 -0500, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Of course each language has commonly used idioms as C with pointer
> arithmetic and code like *p++=*q++ but my point is that although I live near
> a seaway and from where C originated, I am not aware of words like "c-way"
> or "scenic"
On 04/03/2023 17:38, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Of course each language has commonly used idioms
>
That's the point, the correct term is probably "idiomatic"
rather than "pythonic" but it is a defacto standard that
idiomatic Python has become known as Pythonic. I don't
think that's a prob
syntax and library alone, but there is a
cultural element: People writing code in a specific language also read
code by other people in that language, so they start imitating each
other, just like speakers of natural languages imitate each other.
Someone coming from another language will often write cod
code in a specific language also read
code by other people in that language, so they start imitating each
other, just like speakers of natural languages imitate each other.
Someone coming from another language will often write code which is
correct but un-idiomatic, and you can often guess which lan
of seasoned python programmers which they would
prefer, then sometimes there is a more pythonic solution by that definition.
Give the same test to newbies who each came from a different language
background and are just getting started, and I am not sure I care how they
vote!
I suggest that given a d
is not governed by syntax and library alone, but there is a
cultural element: People writing code in a specific language also read
code by other people in that language, so they start imitating each
other, just like speakers of natural languages imitate each other.
Someone coming from another
On 4/03/23 7:51 am, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
I leave you with the question of the day. Was Voldemort pythonic?
Well, he was fluent in Parseltongue, which is not a good sign.
I hope not, otherwise we'll have to rename Python to "The Language
That Shall Not Be Named" an
means you should not care
about efficiency! LOL!
I leave you with the question of the day. Was Voldemort pythonic?
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Alan Gauld
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 4:43 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Which more Pythonic - self.__class
haven't found
>>> anything that talks about which form is considered to be more Pythonic
>>> in those situations where there's no functional difference.
>>
>> I think avoiding dunder methods is generally considered more Pythonic.
Outside of writing dunder
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 20:44, Alan Gauld wrote:
>
> On 02/03/2023 20:54, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> > Seems like an FAQ, and I've found a few things on StackOverflow that
> > discuss the technical differences in edge cases, but I haven't found
> > anything that talks ab
On 02/03/2023 20:54, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Seems like an FAQ, and I've found a few things on StackOverflow that
> discuss the technical differences in edge cases, but I haven't found
> anything that talks about which form is considered to be more Pythonic
> in those situa
Subject: Re: Which more Pythonic - self.__class__ or type(self)?
On 3/2/2023 5:53 PM, Greg Ewing via Python-list wrote:
> On 3/03/23 9:54 am, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>> I haven't found
>> anything that talks about which form is considered to be more Pythonic
>> in those situations w
On 3/2/2023 5:53 PM, Greg Ewing via Python-list wrote:
On 3/03/23 9:54 am, Ian Pilcher wrote:
I haven't found
anything that talks about which form is considered to be more Pythonic
in those situations where there's no functional difference.
In such cases I'd probably go for t
On 3/03/23 9:54 am, Ian Pilcher wrote:
I haven't found
anything that talks about which form is considered to be more Pythonic
in those situations where there's no functional difference.
In such cases I'd probably go for type(x), because it looks less
ugly.
x.__class__ *might* b
On 3/2/2023 3:54 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
Seems like an FAQ, and I've found a few things on StackOverflow that
discuss the technical differences in edge cases, but I haven't found
anything that talks about which form is considered to be more Pythonic
in those situations where there'
Seems like an FAQ, and I've found a few things on StackOverflow that
discuss the technical differences in edge cases, but I haven't found
anything that talks about which form is considered to be more Pythonic
in those situations where there's no functional difference.
Is ther
Dear Mats,
thanks for the reply.
Am 19.09.2022 16:10 schrieb Mats Wichmann:
Kind of unrelated to the actual question, but if you start doing
anything serious under Travis you'll run out of free minutes rather
quickly. My project had to just give up on it after they changed
their licensing mode
working on all archs.
On my side (upstream) I wonder which arch I should "support" in my
TravisCI configuration. I wan't to speed up travis and I want to save
energy and carbon.
I suspect that my Python code should run on much every platform that
offers a Python interpreter. Of course
ello,
I am using TravisCI for my project on GitHub. The project is packaged
for Debian, Ubuntu, Arch and several other distros.
All this distros support multiple architectures and they have their own
test machines to take care that all packages working on all archs.
On my side (upstream) I wonde
wonder which arch I should "support" in my
TravisCI configuration. I wan't to speed up travis and I want to save
energy and carbon.
I suspect that my Python code should run on much every platform that
offers a Python interpreter. Of course there are edge cases. But they
would be
RSTUDIO
but they often come with many superfluous features and lots of complexity.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Grant Edwards
Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 10:35 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
On 2022-08-04, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Fedora is an excellent choice for Python users. Fedora 36 already comes
> with Python 3.11.0b5 in its main repository. In fact you have Python
> 2.7, 3.5-3.11, PyPy 2.7, PyPy 3.7-3.9, and MicroPython at your fingertips.
Except that real programmers use
On 04/08/2022 20.12, Barry wrote:
Noted with thanks Kushal. Since I can download FREE copies of RHEL
9.0, I will use it then.
I consider rhel 9 is an old os. I would suggest using fedora over rhel.
Fedora 36 has python 3.10 and the when fedora 37 is released it will have
python 3.11.
And fedor
> On 4 Aug 2022, at 09:48, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 13:02, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 04 2022 at 10:22:41 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
>>> wrote:
>>> Subject: Which linux dis
On 8/3/22 19:01, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
Subject: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
programming language?
You might try Pythontu.
Not really. Get the distro that looks appealing to you.
One won't be better than the other with regard to lea
On 2022-08-04, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> Subject: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
> programming language?
You can learn Python on any Linux distribution.
First answer this question:
* Whom are you going to ask for help when you run into
d 9.x :) Just that I
dunno which RHEL version is better. Is RHEL 9.0 the best out of 7.x,
8.x and 9.x?
RedHat is a stable OpSys. Accordingly, it doesn't much matter which
version. The general assumption is that the more recent distribution has
more advanced facilities, eg improved security f
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 16:50, dn wrote:
>
> >> PS most of us will qualify for RedHat's Developer program[me] and free
> >> copies of software.
> >
> > I can download free copies of RHEL 7.x, 8.x, and 9.x :) Just that I
> > dunno which RHEL version is be
>> PS most of us will qualify for RedHat's Developer program[me] and free
>> copies of software.
>
> I can download free copies of RHEL 7.x, 8.x, and 9.x :) Just that I
> dunno which RHEL version is better. Is RHEL 9.0 the best out of 7.x,
> 8.x and 9.x?
RedHat is a
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 13:02, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 04 2022 at 10:22:41 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> wrote:
> > Subject: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
> > programming language?
> >
> > Good day from Singapor
ports a recent Python release (e.g. 3.9 or
> > 3.10).
>
> +1
>
> As a Python-learner (there's no comment about current programming
> expertise), it is unlikely to make any difference which Linux distro is
> used.
>
> Answers to such open-ended questions are usually
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 10:47, orzodk wrote:
>
> Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming writes:
>
> > noted with thanks. I have been using Linux for more than 10 years already
>
> Ah, if you're familiar with Redhat (RPM) based distributions, consider
> Fedora as you will have access to newer versions soon
On Thu, Aug 04 2022 at 10:22:41 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> Subject: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
> programming language?
>
> Good day from Singapore,
>
> May I know which linux distro is more conducive for learning the
&g
a Python-learner (there's no comment about current programming
expertise), it is unlikely to make any difference which Linux distro is
used.
Answers to such open-ended questions are usually seated in bias - which
in-turn is mostly likely to be the same answer as 'which is the Linux
distro *
Subject: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
programming language?
Good day from Singapore,
May I know which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
programming language?
Since I have absolutely and totally FREE RHEL developer subscription (I
don&#
I actually did a Google search for "which linux distro is best for python".
Link:
https://www.google.com/search?q=which+linux+distro+is+best+for+python&rlz=1C1GCEA_enSG1005SG1005&sxsrf=ALiCzsYaL58MJsevR2Uc0nnWtmc7kWFbIg%3A1659580387580&ei=4y_rY
wrote:
> Subject: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
> programming language?
>
> Good day from Singapore,
>
> May I know which linux distro is more conducive for learning the
> Python programming language?
>
> Since I have absolutely and totally
Subject: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
programming language?
Good day from Singapore,
May I know which linux distro is more conducive for learning the
Python programming language?
Since I have absolutely and totally FREE RHEL developer subscription
(I don't
Hi Cameron,
Cameron Simpson writes:
> On 10Feb2022 14:14, Loris Bennett wrote:
>>I am writing a command line program which will modify entries in a
>>database and am trying out SQLAlchemy.
>>
>>A typical command might look like
>>
>> um --operati
On 10Feb2022 14:14, Loris Bennett wrote:
>I am writing a command line program which will modify entries in a
>database and am trying out SQLAlchemy.
>
>A typical command might look like
>
> um --operation add --uid ada --gid coders --lang en
>
>Parsing the arguments I get
Hi,
I am writing a command line program which will modify entries in a
database and am trying out SQLAlchemy.
A typical command might look like
um --operation add --uid ada --gid coders --lang en
Parsing the arguments I get, ignoring the operation, a dict
{uid: "ada", gid: &quo
Last I heard, Pypy itself will remain written in a statically typed dialect
of Python that is closest to Python 2.7. However, what's written in that
language includes JIT-compiled interpreters for both Python 2.x and Python
3.x.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 9:15 AM Albert-Jan Roskam
wrote:
>Hi a
Hi all,
Thank you very much for your valuable replies! I will definitely do some
tracing to see where the bottlenecks really are. It's good to know that
pypy is still alive and kicking, I thought it was stuck in py2.7. I will
also write a mini program during the holiday to see how th
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 9:56 PM '2+ wrote:
>
> hi ;)
>
> got popos installed on my raspberry pi4 and it is currently running python
> 3.9.7
>
> i get this error when running my script:
>
> 'array.array' object has no attribute 'tostring'
>
> this bug seems to be pretty old .. how long should i be
hi ;)
got popos installed on my raspberry pi4 and it is currently running python
3.9.7
i get this error when running my script:
'array.array' object has no attribute 'tostring'
this bug seems to be pretty old .. how long should i be waiting to get it
fixed with apt upgrade?
or should i use oth
careful and double check
that what you are calling is really doing what you think.
About the performance, Julia is not magic. It depends on how well it was
coded each package.
In my case I had a good experience except with Parquet.jl which it
didn't understand how to handle categories in
,that%20basic%20operations%20are%20fast.
> > > > I should make clear here that I used the gmpy2 library in Python for
> > > > the basic integer operations which is a wrapper around the same gmp
> > > > library that is used by Julia. That means that the basic inte
are currently pretty slow in Julia":
> > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37193586/bigints-seem-slow-in-julia#:~:text=BigInts%20are%20currently%20pretty%20slow,that%20basic%20operations%20are%20fast.
> > > I should make clear here that I used the gmpy2 library in Python fo
eem-slow-in-julia#:~:text=BigInts%20are%20currently%20pretty%20slow,that%20basic%20operations%20are%20fast.
> > I should make clear here that I used the gmpy2 library in Python for
> > the basic integer operations which is a wrapper around the same gmp
> > library that is used by
0fast.
> I should make clear here that I used the gmpy2 library in Python for
> the basic integer operations which is a wrapper around the same gmp
> library that is used by Julia. That means that the basic integer
> operations were being done by the same gmp library (a C library) i
ad.
I do have a very small amount of experience using Julia. As a
maintainer of SymPy I was very interested by Symbolics.jl which was
created in an attempt to be faster than SymPy. I spent some time going
through tutorials for Julia and making toy programs and then I tried
out Symbolics.jl. I als
Additionally I'd like to ask, if you e.g. used pandas and numpy before
you make the effort of rewriting everything.
Yes python is slower than compiled languages, but especially with numpy
you can make use of compiled code underneath.
Of course this could mean rewriting some existing code but stay
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:02 AM Albert-Jan Roskam
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Python program that uses Tkinter for its GUI. It's rather slow so
> I hope to replace many or all of the non-GUI parts by Julia code. Has
> anybody experience with this? Any packages you can recommend? I found three
> alt
Hi,
I have a Python program that uses Tkinter for its GUI. It's rather slow so I
hope to replace many or all of the non-GUI parts by Julia code. Has anybody
experience with this? Any packages you can recommend? I found three
alternatives:
* https://pyjulia.readthedocs.io/en/latest/usage.html#
On Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 9:15:23 AM UTC+8, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07 2021 at 10:05:58 PM, "hongy...@gmail.com"
> wrote:
> > I've some xlsx files which include dropdown columns in them. I want to
> > know whether I can combine all the li
On Tue, Sep 07 2021 at 10:05:58 PM, "hongy...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> I've some xlsx files which include dropdown columns in them. I want to
> know whether I can combine all the lines into one xlsx file. Any hints
> for doing this job with python programmatically will be high
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 22:05:58 -0700 (PDT), "hongy...@gmail.com"
declaimed the following:
>I've some xlsx files which include dropdown columns in them. I want to know
>whether I can combine all the lines into one xlsx file. Any hints for doing
>this job with python program
I've some xlsx files which include dropdown columns in them. I want to know
whether I can combine all the lines into one xlsx file. Any hints for doing
this job with python programmatically will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
HY
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
gt;>>>> subscript: '.' '.' '.' | test | [test] ':' [test] [sliceop]
>>>>> sliceop: ':' [test]
>>>
>>>>
>>>>This is looking less readable, so, no, I prefer that previous, which was
>>>
test | [test] ':' [test] [sliceop]
>>>> sliceop: ':' [test]
>>
>>>
>>>This is looking less readable, so, no, I prefer that previous, which was
>>>much clearer about slices. I can't even quite make the slices
t; sliceop: ':' [test]
>
>>
>>This is looking less readable, so, no, I prefer that previous, which was
>>much clearer about slices. I can't even quite make the slices out in
>>these rules. (But thanks for the opportunity to try.)
>
> The last part of &
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 00:05:29 -0300, Jack Brandom
declaimed the following:
>Dennis Lee Bieber writes:
>
>> subscript: '.' '.' '.' | test | [test] ':' [test] [sliceop]
>> sliceop: ':' [test]
>
>This is looking less read
ler: '(' [arglist] ')' | '[' subscriptlist ']' | '.' NAME
> subscriptlist: subscript (',' subscript)* [',']
> subscript: '.' '.' '.' | test | [test] ':' [test] [sliceop]
> sliceop
On 11/08/2021 20.17, dn wrote:
I've been trying to remember if we had negative-steps in FORTRAN
do-loops
My text for Fortran 77 (the last version that I ever used) says
that negative increments are supported.
Ref: _FORTRAN 77: Language and Style_; Michael J. Merchant;
Wadsworth Publishing Co
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:17:32 +1200, dn via Python-list
declaimed the following:
>I've been trying to remember if we had negative-steps in FORTRAN
>do-loops especially once the capability to define subscripting-ranges
>came 'in' (but can't be bothered researching further). If it was
>available, o
On 12/08/2021 10.32, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:59:11 -0300, Jack Brandom
> declaimed the following:
>> Where are these production rules coming from? They're not at
>> https://docs.python.org/3/reference/grammar.html
>> The word ``stride'' doesn't appear in this grammar.
On 12/08/2021 02.59, Jack Brandom wrote:
> dn writes:
>
...
>> Also, whereas I prefer to illustrate 'how it works', I perceive that you
>> are used to learning 'rules' and only thereafter their application (the
>> teaching-practice under which mos
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:59:11 -0300, Jack Brandom
declaimed the following:
>
>Where are these production rules coming from? They're not at
>
> https://docs.python.org/3/reference/grammar.html
>
>The word ``stride'' doesn't appear in this grammar.
>
Possibly from older versions of the g
lt is thus somewhat lacking in flow.
> Also, whereas I prefer to illustrate 'how it works', I perceive that you
> are used to learning 'rules' and only thereafter their application (the
> teaching-practice under which most of us learned) - so, another reason
> for mix
ow it works', I perceive that you
are used to learning 'rules' and only thereafter their application (the
teaching-practice under which most of us learned) - so, another reason
for mixing-things-up, to suit yourself (hopefully).
TLDR; if you are a Python-Master there's unlikely to be
Chris Angelico writes:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 7:24 AM Jack Brandom wrote:
>>
>> Greg Ewing writes:
>>
>> > On 6/08/21 12:00 pm, Jack Brandom wrote:
>> >> It seems
>> >> that I'd begin at position 3 (that's "k" whi
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 7:24 AM Jack Brandom wrote:
>
> Greg Ewing writes:
>
> > On 6/08/21 12:00 pm, Jack Brandom wrote:
> >> It seems
> >> that I'd begin at position 3 (that's "k" which I save somewhere), then I
> >> subtract
Greg Ewing writes:
> On 6/08/21 12:00 pm, Jack Brandom wrote:
>> It seems
>> that I'd begin at position 3 (that's "k" which I save somewhere), then I
>> subtract 1 from 3, getting 2 (that's "c", which I save somewhere), then
>> I sub
On 6/08/21 12:00 pm, Jack Brandom wrote:
It seems
that I'd begin at position 3 (that's "k" which I save somewhere), then I
subtract 1 from 3, getting 2 (that's "c", which I save somewhere), then
I subtract 1 from 2, getting 1 (that's "a", .
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 5:22 AM Boris Dorestand wrote:
>
> Jach Feng writes:
>
> >> > s = "Jack Brandom"
> >> > s[3 : -13 : -1]
> >> >> 'kcaJ'
> >> >> I have no idea how to replace that -13 with a positive index. Is it
> >> >> possible at all?
> > That's not possible because a positive ind
#x27;s not possible because a positive index is relative to the leftmost item > 0
And the middle index is always exclusive, so we can't go to the left of
0 and remain positive. Okay, I think that answers it. It's not
possible at all.
> Below is some rules of slice usage which I co
> >>>>> s = "Jack Brandom"
> >>>>> s[3 : -13 : -1]
> >> 'kcaJ'
> >> I have no idea how to replace that -13 with a positive index. Is it
> >> possible at all?
That's not possible because a positive index
13 : -1]
>> 'kcaJ'
>> I have no idea how to replace that -13 with a positive index. Is it
>> possible at all?
>
> I don't think so, because the second number (in this case -13) is the
> index before which you stop.
So, can you write a procedure that impleme
r (in this case -13) is the
index before which you stop. For example:
>>> s
'Jack Brandom'
>>> s[3:0:-1]
'kca'
>>> s[3:1:-1]
'kc'
>>>
However, since you want to go through item 0 in the original string,
you don't need a nu
For instance, I can
reverse a "Jack" this way:
>>> s = "Jack Brandom"
>>> s[3 : -13 : -1]
'kcaJ'
I have no idea how to replace that -13 with a positive index. Is it
possible at all?
But this example gives me the idea that perhaps each slice is e
Hi,
I have to asynchronously connect to many home routers with telnet protocol in
order to get some values.
Upon getting input data (ip, username, password), I should connect to the
router, execute commands, get their results, postprocess results and finally
return certain values.
Everything
On 3/01/21 12:30 am, Alan Bawden wrote:
So as long as the OP's commands are no longer than 512 bytes, and as
long as they are careful to send commands in a single call to write(),
Also note that's one write() system call, which may or may not
correspond to one Python write() call
of the file status flags is set.
> >
> ... Just to make sure I wasn't missing
> something, I tested your exact command before I sent my previous reply.
> They mixed.
>
This is really strange. On which system did you test? unix, linux or a
surro
PS:
difference starts after 64K block
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Il 02/01/2021 01:07, Alan Bawden ha scritto:
jak writes:
Il 01/01/2021 06:23, Alan Bawden ha scritto:
> jak writes:
>
> Running the command:
>
> $ cat bible.txt > cmdpipe & cat bible.txt > cmdpipe & cat bible.txt >
cmdpipe
>
> the three texts do not
>
cmdpipe
the three texts do not mix
Saying it again doesn't make it any more true. If bible.txt is large
enough, they most definitely DO mix! Just to make sure I wasn't missing
something, I tested your exact command before I sent my previous reply.
They mixed.
T
jak writes:
Il 01/01/2021 06:23, Alan Bawden ha scritto:
> jak writes:
>
> Running the command:
>
> $ cat bible.txt > cmdpipe & cat bible.txt > cmdpipe & cat bible.txt >
cmdpipe
>
> the three texts do not mix
>
> The three texts do not mix as long a
On 2021-01-01 at 21:41:24 +0100,
jak wrote:
> Sorry if I made you argumentative ...
And I didn't mean to be argumentative. :-)
We both offered alternatives, and we both argued for them (in the sense
of claiming that our own ideas were good). Each solution is better,
depending on certain detai
On 01Jan2021 03:43, jak wrote:
>Maybe the fact that I'm not English and I don't know the language well
>doesn't allow me to express myself clearly. Try it one more time:
>The OP would like to give some command to a script that is running. How?
>With a script that sends commands to it. One of the w
the main script to create a popup window with an
image or a plot.
What would be the proper way to approach it. How to make communication between
two scripts?
Thank you.
Petro.
I have suggested an alternative way for his necessity.
It will be up to him to decide which one he should adopt. Th
> > scripts or from the python shell.
> > From time to time I would ask the main script to create a popup window with
> > an image or a plot.
> > What would be the proper way to approach it. How to make communication
> > between two scripts?
> > Thank you.
>
Il 01/01/2021 04:14, 2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com ha scritto:
On 2021-01-01 at 03:43:43 +0100,
Regarding "Re: Control stript which is runing in background.,"
jak wrote:
Il 01/01/2021 01:43, Cameron Simpson ha scritto:
On 01Jan2021 01:21, jak wrote:
Il 01/01/2021 00:58, 2qd
Il 01/01/2021 06:23, Alan Bawden ha scritto:
jak writes:
Running the command:
$ cat bible.txt > cmdpipe & cat bible.txt > cmdpipe & cat bible.txt >
cmdpipe
the three texts do not mix
The three texts do not mix as long at the contents of bible.txt is short
enough (and provide
jak writes:
Running the command:
$ cat bible.txt > cmdpipe & cat bible.txt > cmdpipe & cat bible.txt > cmdpipe
the three texts do not mix
The three texts do not mix as long at the contents of bible.txt is short
enough (and provided `cat' only calls `write' once). In the POSIX
spe
1 - 100 of 3230 matches
Mail list logo
