It seems to be a language embraced by people who enjoy coding. Not so
much by the time-spent-seeking-degree to paycheck ratio balancing
crowd. Or maybe I just hate bloated IDEs and I've heard too many Java
dev jokes to be impartial.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Esam Qanadeely doctore...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 28, 8:27 am, Tim Roberts t...@probo.com wrote:
Deep_Feelings doctore...@gmail.com wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
How do you know, and why does it matter?
On Aug 29, 11:14 pm, kennyken747 kennyken...@gmail.com wrote:
(snip)
You guys can say anything you'd like it to be in this thread, but the
actual reason comes down to
1. No marketing. Seriously, if Microsoft was pushing Python it would
obviously be a lot bigger in terms of developers.
I
Deep_Feelings schrieb:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
Besides the marketing argument, python never had a hype.
Both PHP and ruby(Rails to be precise) got widespread because they could
at one point do one thing
On Aug 29, 6:16 am, paul p...@subsignal.org wrote:
Deep_Feelings schrieb: python got relatively fewer numbers of developers
than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
Besides the marketing argument, python never had a hype.
Both PHP and ruby(Rails to be precise) got
Esam Qanadeely wrote:
.NET= i meant all .NET languages
What? You mean like Python? ;-)
Google IronPython ya troll...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 28 août, 02:47, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Deep_Feelings wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
Fewer needed?
excellent answer. LOL.
Olivier
--
Esam Qanadeely wrote:
who cares if a language is compiled or interpreted as long as it runs
and perform the function.
second thing is : even if java is faster than python , unless you are
making performance critical operations : who cares? computers are
getting faster all the time and languages
On 28 Aug, 02:34, Deep_Feelings doctore...@gmail.com wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
Because we are better, so fewer are needed.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Aug 28, 9:55 am, sturlamolden sturlamol...@yahoo.no wrote:
On 28 Aug, 02:34, Deep_Feelings doctore...@gmail.com wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
Because we are better, so fewer are needed.
That makes
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:34:17 -0700, Deep_Feelings wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high level
languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
Python programmers are the elite. The elite are always fewer than the
masses.
--
Steven
who is three quarters joking
--
Chris Rebert wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Deep_Feelingsdoctore...@gmail.com
wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
We lack Sun and Microsoft's massive marketing departments. :)
I'm inclined to
On Aug 28, 2009, at 1:03 AM, Esam Qanadeely wrote:
who cares if a language is compiled or interpreted as long as it runs
and perform the function.
second thing is : even if java is faster than python , unless you are
making performance critical operations : who cares? computers are
getting
On Aug 28, 10:36 am, jfabi...@yolo.com wrote:
(snip)
I'm inclined to agreed. But in recent years we lost a number of developers
to Ruby. I don't know but I doubt Ruby has a marketing budget. So in my
mind it is difficult for me to blame just the lack of marketing dollars for
the lost.
In article b8udnycvn-hlzarxnz2dnuvz_ogdn...@wavecable.com,
jfabi...@yolo.com wrote:
Chris Rebert wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Deep_Feelingsdoctore...@gmail.com
wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc  why ?
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Deep_Feelingsdoctore...@gmail.com wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
We lack Sun and Microsoft's massive marketing departments. :)
Cheers,
Chris
--
http://blog.rebertia.com
--
Deep_Feelings wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
Fewer needed?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Deep_Feelings wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
Perhaps because we value QUALITY over QUANTITY ...
Gary Herron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Aug 28, 3:46 am, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Deep_Feelingsdoctore...@gmail.com wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
We lack Sun and Microsoft's massive marketing
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Esam Qanadeelydoctore...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 28, 3:46 am, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Deep_Feelingsdoctore...@gmail.com wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages
On Aug 27, 7:34 pm, Deep_Feelings doctore...@gmail.com wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
Ugh? Well maybe if you put some deep_thoughts into this conundrum you
may reveal the answer to your self. Python is an
r wrote:
As long as Java
can be complied strait to machine code
I think you meant compared here.
Stefan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
who cares if a language is compiled or interpreted as long as it runs
and perform the function.
second thing is : even if java is faster than python , unless you are
making performance critical operations : who cares? computers are
getting faster all the time and languages like python or ruby are
i meant fast enough for most (but not all) applications
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Deep_Feelings doctore...@gmail.com wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
How do you know, and why does it matter?
By the way, .NET is not a language. I assume you meant C#.
--
Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com
On Aug 28, 8:27 am, Tim Roberts t...@probo.com wrote:
Deep_Feelings doctore...@gmail.com wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
How do you know, and why does it matter?
By the way, .NET is not a language. I
On Aug 27, 7:34 pm, Deep_Feelings doctore...@gmail.com wrote:
python got relatively fewer numbers of developers than other high
level languages like .NET , java .. etc why ?
Oh, and why on god's green would you ever compare Java (*puke*) and
Python in the same breath? You say Python is a
28 matches
Mail list logo
