On 2 mei, 20:56, Michel Claveau -
MVPenleverlesx_xx...@xmclavxeaux.com.invalid wrote:
Hi!
On my system, thera are not twain32.dll or twain_32.dll, but twain.dll
@+
--
Michel Claveau
Hi,
I have both. They are correctly installed and working. ctypes gives a
different response if it cannot
On 5/3/2011 1:04 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
The bad thing about this recipe is that it requires quite a bit of
background knowledge in order to infer that the code the developer is
looking at is actually correct.
The main math knowledge needed is the trivial fact that if a*x + b = 0,
then x =
On 03 May 2011 00:21:45 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
: Python aims at acceptable performance (between 10 and 100 times slower
: than C) and much easier development (between 10 and 100 times faster than
: C *wink*). If that tradeoff doesn't suit you,
Terry Reedy, 03.05.2011 08:00:
On 5/3/2011 1:04 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
The bad thing about this recipe is that it requires quite a bit of
background knowledge in order to infer that the code the developer is
looking at is actually correct.
The main math knowledge needed is the trivial fact
Terry Reedy wrote:
The trick is that replacing x with j and evaluating
therefore causes (in Python) all the coefficients of x (now j) to be
added together separately from all the constant terms to reduce the
linear equation to a*x+b (= 0 implied).
Hmmm... so if we used quaternions, could we
You can check this https://github.com/kanaka/noVNC
2011/5/3 Dan Stromberg drsali...@gmail.com
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:23 PM, PyNewbie ryan.morr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a python class or open source code that is tightly
integrated with VNC protocols - any ideas?
--
On Tue, 3 May 2011 07:56:26 +1000, Chris Angelico
ros...@gmail.com wrote:
: often recursively. The compiler should generate code the way the CPU
: thinks (most optimally), i.e. iteratively.
:
: The CPU can function iteratively or recursively.
I should have said 'hardware' rather than CPU.
On May 3, 10:29 am, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Dan Stromberg drsali...@gmail.com wrote:
Doh.
Usually when someone gives a recursive solution to this problem, it's
O(logn), but not this time.
Here's a logn one:
:-) Ok so you beat me to it :D
I
Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
t = (type, value, traceback)
raise t
That it accepts the tuple and raises a value-less expression of type
`type` surprises me. The docs don't say anything about this, and I
would have expected a TypeError, but it appears to be extracting the
first
On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, rusi wrote:
On May 3, 10:29 am, Chris Angelicoros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Dan Strombergdrsali...@gmail.com wrote:
Doh.
Usually when someone gives a recursive solution to this problem, it's
O(logn), but not this time.
Here's a logn
On Apr 30, 6:39 pm, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 2:19 PM, James A. Donald jamesdnld...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have noticed that installingpythonprograms tends to be hell,
particularly underwindows, and installingpythonprograms that rely
on, or in large
On May 3, 3:32 pm, Dave Angel da...@ieee.org wrote:
What I'm surprised at is that nobody has pointed out that the logn
version is also generally more accurate, given traditional floats.
Usually getting the answer accurate (given the constraints of finite
precision intermediates) is more
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Dave Angel da...@ieee.org wrote:
What I'm surprised at is that nobody has pointed out that the logn version
is also generally more accurate, given traditional floats. Usually getting
the answer accurate (given the constraints of finite precision
intermediates)
On Tue, 03 May 2011 21:04:07 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
And that, Your Honour, is why I prefer bignums (especially for integers)
to floating point. Precision rather than performance.
I'm intrigued by your comment especially for integers, which implies
that you might use bignums for
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Tue, 03 May 2011 21:04:07 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
And that, Your Honour, is why I prefer bignums (especially for integers)
to floating point. Precision rather than performance.
I'm intrigued
On 01 May 2011 08:45:51 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
: Python uses a data model of name binding and call by object (also
: known as call by sharing). I trust I don't need to define my terms, but
: just in case:
Without having the time to get my hand
py2exe would work, but a correct installer would install Python if not
present, then install the program.
py2exe packs everything you need, including Python. A program created with
py2exe does not depend on installed Python.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes:
Python's data model is different from other languages
which is perfectly correct, if you think of C as other languages. But
it's equally correct to say that Python's data model is the same as other
languages. As I understand it,
Dag mannen,
Afgelopen week liepen we tegen het feit op dat Google e-mails afkomstig van
onze server als spam markeerde en deze zonder bericht verwijderde. Ik vroeg
me af of een van jullie hier wel eens tegenop is gelopen en wil bij deze
even waarschuwen dat dat dus zomaar kan gebeuren.
Wat voor
Hello,
I've downloaded the 3.2 source tarball from python.org and tried to
compile Python from scratch in a Cygwin 1.7.7 environment. Configure
works as expected. Make fails with the following message:
make: *** No rule to make target `libpython3.2m.dll.a', needed by
`python.exe'. Stop.
English man English.
2011/5/3 Wim Feijen w...@go2people.nl
Dag mannen,
Afgelopen week liepen we tegen het feit op dat Google e-mails afkomstig van
onze server als spam markeerde en deze zonder bericht verwijderde. Ik vroeg
me af of een van jullie hier wel eens tegenop is gelopen en wil bij
This is a place about python man! Python.
2011/5/3 Ashraf Ali eagleba...@gmail.com
What are you lookink for. Just visit to see what you want
www.bollywoodhotactresswallpapers.blogspot.com
www.bollywoodhotwallpaperz.blogspot.com
www.bollywoodhotactresspicz.blogspot.com
Pyinstaller can also be used to create executables. It does not need python
installed.
We have been able to make executables for windows and mac as well with this.
- Parikshit
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Miki Tebeka miki.teb...@gmail.com wrote:
py2exe would work, but a correct installer
Excuse me, this message was sent to the wrong mailing list.
Sorry, Wim
2011/5/3 Wim Feijen w...@go2people.nl
Dag mannen,
Afgelopen week liepen we tegen het feit op dat Google e-mails afkomstig van
onze server als spam markeerde en deze zonder bericht verwijderde. Ik vroeg
me af of een van
On 2011-05-03, Hans Georg Schaathun h...@schaathun.net wrote:
On 01 May 2011 08:45:51 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
: Python uses a data model of name binding and call by object (also
: known as call by sharing). I trust I don't need to define my terms, but
Wim Feijen wrote:
Excuse me, this message was sent to the wrong mailing list.
Sorry, Wim
2011/5/3 Wim Feijen w...@go2people.nl mailto:w...@go2people.nl
Dag mannen,
You're lucky that the native language of our Benevolent Dictator For
Life is tolerated in this list.
JM
--
On Tue, 03 May 2011 13:39:24 +0100, Hans Georg Schaathun wrote:
On 01 May 2011 08:45:51 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
: Python uses a data model of name binding and call by object (also
: known as call by sharing). I trust I don't need to define my
On 5/3/2011 2:29 AM, Gregory Ewing wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
The trick is that replacing x with j and evaluating therefore causes
(in Python) all the coefficients of x (now j) to be added together
separately from all the constant terms to reduce the linear equation
to a*x+b (= 0 implied).
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Tue, 03 May 2011 21:04:07 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
And that, Your Honour, is why I prefer bignums (especially for integers)
to floating point. Precision rather than performance.
I'm
Hi!
Here's the demonstrating code:
# module foo.py
var = 0
def set():
global var
var = 1
Script using this module:
import foo
from foo import *
print var, foo.var
set()
print var, foo.var
Script output:
0 0
0 1
Apparently, the `var`
Hans Georg Schaathun wrote:
On 01 May 2011 08:45:51 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
: Python uses a data model of name binding and call by object (also
: known as call by sharing). I trust I don't need to define my terms,
: but just in case:
Without
On May 2, 11:29 pm, Gregory Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
The trick is that replacing x with j and evaluating
therefore causes (in Python) all the coefficients of x (now j) to be
added together separately from all the constant terms to reduce the
linear
On May 2, 10:04 pm, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
The bad thing about this recipe is that it requires quite a bit of
background knowledge in order to infer that the code the developer is
looking at is actually correct. At first sight, it looks like an evil hack,
and the lack of
Hi all,
I have an extension type written in C, but I cannot get it to pickle, any
insights would be greatly appreciated.
I see in the docs that I should define a __reduce__ method and that does get
called, but I don't know specifically the type of the 'callable object' that
should be the first
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 5/3/2011 2:29 AM, Gregory Ewing wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
The trick is that replacing x with j and evaluating therefore causes
(in Python) all the coefficients of x (now j) to be added together
separately from all the
On 2011-05-03, Mel mwil...@the-wire.com wrote:
To illustrate the neither-fish-nor-fowl nature of Python calls:
mwilson@tecumseth:~$ python
Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Apr 16 2010, 13:09:56)
[GCC 4.4.3] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
def
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Dun Peal dunpea...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, the `var` we imported from `foo` never got set, but
`foo.var` on the imported `foo` - did. Why?
Because all names are references to some values, not other names (in
CPython, it means all names are PyObject*, and
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Dun Peal dunpea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Here's the demonstrating code:
# module foo.py
var = 0
def set():
global var
var = 1
Script using this module:
import foo
from foo import *
print var, foo.var
set()
Dun Peal wrote:
Hi!
Here's the demonstrating code:
# module foo.py
var = 0
def set():
global var
var = 1
Script using this module:
import foo
from foo import *
print var, foo.var
set()
print var, foo.var
Script output:
On 5/3/11 11:48 AM, Stefan Kuzminski wrote:
Hi all,
I have an extension type written in C, but I cannot get it to pickle, any
insights would be greatly appreciated.
I see in the docs that I should define a __reduce__ method and that does get
called, but I don't know specifically the type of
Your problem is reveal in the subject line. As discussed in many other
threads, including a current one, Python does not have 'variables' in
the way that many understand the term. Python binds names to objects.
Binding statements (assignment, augmented assignment, import, def,
class, and others
Chris Angelico wrote:
The recursion is in the last block. Note that it calls a function,
then keeps going. It doesn't fork. There are two CALL_FUNCTION
opcodes, called*sequentially*. In terms of the call stack, there is
only ever one of those two calls active at any given time.
RuntimeError:
Dun Peal wrote:
# module foo.py
var = 0
def set():
global var
var = 1
My two cents to add in addition to the correct accounts of [ Daniel,
Chris, Mel] is that you might have a misunderstanding of var, generally.
Python has no variables--- in the way you
Hey, I am writing a code in python to access public data online (using
BeautifulSoup).
The task is relatively easy but the code does not get to the page
because I need to accept the terms and condition of the website first
(by a standard click 'Accept' button).
I need to tell python how to
Stefan Kuzminski wrote:
I have an extension type written in C, but I cannot get it to pickle, any
insights would be greatly appreciated.
I see in the docs that I should define a __reduce__ method and that does
get called, but I don't know specifically the type of the 'callable
object' that
rusi rustompm...@gmail.com writes:
I am a bit surprised that no one has mentioned rcs so far
Not an option if you are not on a *ix system and not something I am
specifically recommending.
I actually use rcs in Windows. Needs a little setup, but works great,
from Emacs VC-mode too.
--
On May 2, 12:38 pm, Algis Kabaila akaba...@pcug.org.au wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 19:09:38 jacek2v wrote:
On May 2, 9:48 am, Algis Kabaila akaba...@pcug.org.au wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 17:19:57 rusi wrote:
On May 2, 12:08 pm, Algis Kabaila akaba...@pcug.org.au
wrote:
On May 3, 11:19 pm, Anssi Saari a...@sci.fi wrote:
rusi rustompm...@gmail.com writes:
I am a bit surprised that no one has mentioned rcs so far
Not an option if you are not on a *ix system and not something I am
specifically recommending.
I actually use rcs in Windows. Needs a little
OK, I understand now.
`from foo import var` means create a module-global name `var` inside
the current module, and have it point at the object `foo.var` is
pointing at (following its evaluation).
Naturally, regardless of whether `foo.var` ever changes, the global
`var` of the current module
On May 2, 10:48 pm, John Henry john106he...@hotmail.com wrote:
Attempt to push Pythoncard to a 1.0 status is now underway. A
temporary website has been created at:
http://code.google.com/p/pythoncard-1-0/
The official website continues to behttp://pythoncard.sourceforge.net/
Pythoncard is
P.S. now I have to ask: is there a symbolic reference in Python, i.e.
a name foo that points to whatever bar.baz is pointing at?
Thanks, D.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I open a csv file and create a DictReader object. Subsequently, reading
lines from this file I try to update a dictionary of lists:
csvf=open(os.path.join(root,fcsv),'rb')
csvr=csv.DictReader(csvf)
refd=dict.fromkeys(csvr.fieldnames,[])
for row in csvr:
for (k,v) in row.items():
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Dun Peal dunpea...@gmail.com wrote:
P.S. now I have to ask: is there a symbolic reference in Python, i.e.
a name foo that points to whatever bar.baz is pointing at?
Well, you could easily simulate that with proxy object,
class SymbolicReference(object):
def
Alex van der Spek zd...@xs4all.nl writes:
refd=dict.fromkeys(csvr.fieldnames,[]) ...
I do not understand why this appends v to every key k each time.
You have initialized every element of refd to the same list. Try
refd = dict((k,[]) for k in csvr.fieldnames)
instead.
--
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid wrote:
Alex van der Spek zd...@xs4all.nl writes:
refd=dict.fromkeys(csvr.fieldnames,[]) ...
I do not understand why this appends v to every key k each time.
You have initialized every element of refd to the same list.
Thank you! Would never have found that by myself.
Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid wrote in message
news:7x7ha75zib@ruckus.brouhaha.com...
Alex van der Spek zd...@xs4all.nl writes:
refd=dict.fromkeys(csvr.fieldnames,[]) ...
I do not understand why this appends v to every key k each
On Tue, 03 May 2011 12:33:15 -0400, Mel
mwil...@the-wire.com wrote:
: mwilson@tecumseth:~$ python
: Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Apr 16 2010, 13:09:56)
: [GCC 4.4.3] on linux2
: Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
: def identify_call (a_list):
: ... a_list[0] =
On 03 May 2011 15:20:42 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
: You get credit for not falling into the trap of thinking there are only
: two, call by reference and call by value, but there are *many* more than
: just three. Wikipedia lists at least 13:
Ah.
Thanks for the clues, I made a modification so that reduce returns this..
return Py_BuildValue(O(O), Py_TYPE(self), PyTuple_New(0), Py_None,
Py_None, Py_None );
and now I get this different error when trying to pickle the type..
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:10 AM, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net wrote:
If your point is that the infinite process is the problem, I agree. But my
point is that the cpu crunch and the rate at which the call stack is filled
has to do with the double call (which never finds tail processing).
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
from foo import *
can be thought of as essentially doing:
import foo
set = foo.set
var = foo.var
del foo
Here's a side point. What types will hold a reference to the enclosing
module (or at least its dictionary)? Would
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Raymond Hettinger pyt...@rcn.com wrote:
We should have a separate thread for the most practical, best
documented, least surprising, and most boring recipe ;-)
a += b # Adds b to a in-place. Polymorphic - works on a wide variety of types.
You didn't say it had
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Hans Georg Schaathun h...@schaathun.net wrote:
This looks like plain old transmission by reference to me.
I.e. the functions get a reference to an object and make any
change to the object.
Reference being exactly what's passed around. There are now two
On 5/3/11 4:34 PM, Stefan Kuzminski wrote:
Thanks for the clues, I made a modification so that reduce returns this..
return Py_BuildValue(O(O), Py_TYPE(self), PyTuple_New(0), Py_None,
Py_None, Py_None );
and now I get this different error when trying to pickle the type..
Hi,
I'm just reading Robert M. Martin's book entitled Clean Code. In Ch.
5 he says that a function that is called should be below a function
that does the calling. This creates a nice flow down from top to
bottom.
However, when I write a Python script I do just the opposite. I start
with the
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Raymond Hettinger pyt...@rcn.com wrote:
We should have a separate thread for the most practical, best
documented, least surprising, and most boring recipe ;-)
a += b # Adds b to a
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
from foo import *
can be thought of as essentially doing:
import foo
set = foo.set
var = foo.var
del foo
Here's a side point. What types will hold
On May 2, 11:23 pm, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Terry Reedy, 03.05.2011 08:00:
On 5/3/2011 1:04 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
The bad thing about this recipe is that it requires quite a bit of
background knowledge in order to infer that the code the developer is
looking at is
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Jabba Laci jabba.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm just reading Robert M. Martin's book entitled Clean Code. In Ch.
5 he says that a function that is called should be below a function
that does the calling. This creates a nice flow down from top to
bottom.
I
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:10 AM, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net wrote:
If your point is that the infinite process is the problem, I agree. But my
point is that the cpu crunch and the rate at which the call stack is
On 03/05/2011 23:31, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Jabba Lacijabba.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm just reading Robert M. Martin's book entitled Clean Code. In Ch.
5 he says that a function that is called should be below a function
that does the calling. This creates a
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
A back-of-the-envelope calculation
shows that with modern technology it would take more than 10 ** 257
years to complete.
Then I propose that Python be extended to allow for underlying
hardware upgrades without terminating
On Tuesday 03 May 2011 16:00:05 Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/3/2011 1:04 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
The bad thing about this recipe is that it requires quite a
bit of background knowledge in order to infer that the
code the developer is looking at is actually correct.
The main math knowledge
Jabba Laci jabba.l...@gmail.com writes:
Is there a convention for this? Should main() be at the top and called
function below?
No, it's Python convention for both of those to be at the end of the
module.
I follow the convention described by Guido van Rossum in
On 5/3/11 5:46 PM, MRAB wrote:
On 03/05/2011 23:31, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Jabba Lacijabba.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm just reading Robert M. Martin's book entitled Clean Code. In Ch.
5 he says that a function that is called should be below a function
that
In article mailman.1127.1304460530.9059.python-l...@python.org,
Jabba Laci jabba.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just reading Robert M. Martin's book entitled Clean Code. In Ch.
5 he says that a function that is called should be below a function
that does the calling. This creates a nice flow down
Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Jabba Laci jabba.l...@gmail.com writes:
Is there a convention for this? Should main() be at the top and called
function below?
No, it's Python convention for both of those to be at the end of the
module.
I follow the convention described by
Hi,
I'm trying to make a python script (in windows 7 x64 using python 2.5) to
start a process, and kill it after x minutes/seconds and kill all the
descendants of it.
Whats the best way of doing this in python? which module is best suited to
do this? subprocess?
thanks for any help
--
Hello,
I have an object of class X that I am writing to a pickled file. The
pickling part goes fine, but I am having some problems reading the
object back out, as I get complaints about unable to import module X.
The only way I have found around it is to run the read-file code out of
the
On 2011-05-03, Jabba Laci jabba.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just reading Robert M. Martin's book entitled Clean Code. In Ch.
5 he says that a function that is called should be below a function
that does the calling. This creates a nice flow down from top to
bottom.
I generally expect the
closer I think
1) I changed tp_name to be 'observation.MV' ( module is named observation.c
) and now I get a new error..
PicklingError: Can't pickle type 'observation.MV': import of module
observation failed
2) here is the init function, sorry I did not include it in the original
listing
void
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Catherine Moroney
catherine.m.moro...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Am I explaining myself properly? Why doesn't the code that loads the
object from the pickled file work unless I am sitting in the same directory?
The code that writes the pickled file has the statement
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Astan Chee astan.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make a python script (in windows 7 x64 using python 2.5) to
start a process, and kill it after x minutes/seconds and kill all the
descendants of it.
Whats the best way of doing this in python? which
On 2011-05-03 20:18:33 -0400, Catherine Moroney said:
Hello,
I have an object of class X that I am writing to a pickled file. The
pickling part goes fine, but I am having some problems reading the
object back out, as I get complaints about unable to import module X.
The only way I have
New submission from Davi Post p...@pobox.com:
The See also reference in the documentation for the token and symbol modules
is no longer accurate. The second example mentioned was apparently removed in
Python 2.7.
This leaves no explanation for how to use the symbol module.
I don't think this
Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com added the comment:
This issue is very annoying when you use python's with different deployment
targets and should IMHO be fixed in the next release.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl
priority: normal - release blocker
Peter Saveliev svinota.savel...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ok, patch attached.
Patch made for Python: 2.6
Tested Python versions: 2.6, 2.7
--
keywords: +patch
versions: +Python 2.6
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21866/newname_race_fix.patch
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
The original code was trying to call PyArg_ParseTuple assuming 2 args and in
case of failure (*any* failure) was starting over assuming 3 args.
The attached patch makes PyArg_ParseTuple accept 2 or 3 args and re-arranges
the last two if
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Actually, it came to me that if a child process exists, the queues are not
guaranteed to be a consistent state anymore (the child could have terminated in
the middle of a partial read or write). So it may be better to simply declare
the
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Added tests and fixed all the problems they found.
--
keywords: +needs review
stage: patch review - commit review
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21868/issue10169-2.diff
___
Python tracker
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Patch looks fine to me, thank you.
--
stage: - patch review
versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11849
Steffen Daode Nurpmeso sdao...@googlemail.com added the comment:
Now me.
(http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Arrays-and-pointers-implementation.html#Arrays-and-pointers-implementation)
When casting from pointer to integer and back again, the resulting
pointer must reference the same object as
Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com added the comment:
Under what circumstances do we expect a ProcessPoolExecutor child process to be
killed outside of the control of the ProcessPoolExecutor?
If the user kills a child then maybe all we want to do is raise an exception
rather than deadlock as a
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Under what circumstances do we expect a ProcessPoolExecutor child
process to be killed outside of the control of the
ProcessPoolExecutor?
Killed by the user, or by an automatic device (such as the Linux OOM
killer), or crashed.
If the user
Brian Quinlan br...@sweetapp.com added the comment:
Killed by the user, or by an automatic device (such as the Linux OOM
killer), or crashed.
Crashed would be bad - it would indicate a bug in the
ProcessPoolExecutor code.
If the user kills a child then maybe all we want to do is raise an
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Killed by the user, or by an automatic device (such as the Linux OOM
killer), or crashed.
Crashed would be bad - it would indicate a bug in the
ProcessPoolExecutor code.
I meant a crash in Python itself, or any third-party extension
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset d003ce770ba1 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #8407: Fix pthread_sigmask() tests on Mac OS X
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d003ce770ba1
--
___
Python tracker
Steffen Daode Nurpmeso sdao...@googlemail.com added the comment:
Should we fix Python 2.7?
- backport issue #8651
- use PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN in zlibmodule.c
I really thought about this over night.
I'm a C programmer and thus:
- Produce no bugs
- If you've produced a bug, fix it at once
- If
Changes by Steffen Daode Nurpmeso sdao...@googlemail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file21855/11277-27.1.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11277
___
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset 618c3e971e80 by Victor Stinner in branch '2.7':
(Merge 3.1) Issue #11277: mmap.mmap() calls fcntl(fd, F_FULLFSYNC) on Mac OS X
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/618c3e971e80
--
___
Python
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
