On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:13:33 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:19:16 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
(For the record, I can only think of one trap for the unwary: time
objects are false at *exactly*
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:18:28 -0400, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:15:13 -0400, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
For example, instead of if stack: or if bool(stack):, we could use
if
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:19:48 -0500, Andrew Berg wrote:
To put it in duck-typing terms, why should everything have to quack like
True or False? Sure, I can see why 1 quacks like True or [] quacks like
False, but I don't see why say, a Logger or function should quack like
either.
The default
On 7/15/2012 1:34 AM, Andrew Berg wrote:
This has probably been discussed before, but why is there an implicit
conversion to a boolean in if and while statements?
if not None:
print('hi')
prints 'hi' since bool(None) is False.
If this was discussed in a PEP, I would like a link to it.
On Thursday, March 24, 2011 7:32:44 AM UTC-7, Kees Bakker wrote:
Sad news (for me, at least), in the upcoming version 7.0 of NetBeans
there will be no Python plugin anymore.
FWIW on the Windows platform the Zeus IDE has support for python:
http://www.zeusedit.com/python.html
Zeus is a
在 2003年1月26日星期日UTC+8下午10时01分02秒，quot;Martin v. Löwisquot;写道：
Tim C wrote:
gt; I#39;ve been trying pyxml from jython and fell into the problem when
trying to
gt; create executables that pyxml#39;s mechanisms for importing modules
confound
gt; the compiler.
What do you mean by
On 7/17/2012 2:08 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
The default behaviour is that every object is something, hence true-like,
unless explicitly coded to be treated as false-like. Since both loggers
and functions are objects, they are true-like unless the default is
overridden.
I am aware of the
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 6:20:34 PM UTC+2, rusi wrote:
On Jul 15, 11:35 am, Dieter Maurer lt;die...@handshake.degt; wrote:
gt; moo...@yahoo.co.uk writes:
gt; gt; ...
gt; gt; Does pickle have any advantages over json/yaml?
gt;
gt; It can store and retrieve almost any Python object with almost
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Andrew Berg bahamutzero8...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/17/2012 2:08 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
The default behaviour is that every object is something, hence true-like,
unless explicitly coded to be treated as false-like. Since both loggers
and functions are
在 2003年11月24日星期一UTC+8下午7时42分31秒，Paul Boddie写道：
janeaustin...@hotmail.com (Jane Austine) wrote in message
news:lt;ba1e306f.0311201805.9df...@posting.google.comgt;...
gt; I#39;m trying to parse an xml file with jython (not through java parsers
gt; like xerces).
gt;
gt; I tried minidom in
Pythoners
Python 2.7.3
Ubuntu Linux 12.04 LTS
I've been taking a brief look at Python.
From the tutorial documentation I get the following
'Python is an easy to learn, powerful programming language. It has
efficient high-level data structures and a simple but effective approach
to
Hi, I'm not sure if it's ok to post regarding a small local workshop
(based on Railsbridge and the Boston Python Workshop) here so please
direct me elsewhere if I am mistaken:
OpenHatch's first Chicago Python workshop is heading our way, on
August 17th - 18th. These events are tailored for women
2012/7/16 Peter Otten __pete...@web.de:
No, I don't see how the code you gave above can fail with an OSError.
Can you give an example that produces the desired behaviour with nose? Maybe
we can help you translate it to basic unittest.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
gaodexiaozh...@gmail.com, 17.07.2012 10:35:
hi,do you know the PyXML whether can be supported by Jython ?
PyXML is a dead project, don't use it.
You can use ElementTree in Jython, just as in Python.
Stefan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
It already is part of the collection interface: it is spelled __nonzero__
(Python 2) or __bool__ (Python 3), and like all dunder methods, it is
called automatically for you when you use the right
John Posner jjpos...@optimum.net wrote:
On 7/16/2012 12:28 PM, tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote:
tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote:
I am trying to use the PyQt4 calendar widget to perform some different
actions on specific dates. There are three events available:-
selectionChanged()
On 17/07/12 10:35, gaodexiaozh...@gmail.com wrote:
gt; I#39;m trying to parse an xml file with jython (not through java parsers
gt; like xerces).
https://code.google.com/p/jython-elementtree/ ???
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Matej Cepl, 17.07.2012 11:39:
On 17/07/12 10:35, gaodexiaozh...@gmail.com wrote:
gt; I#39;m trying to parse an xml file with jython (not through java
parsers
gt; like xerces).
https://code.google.com/p/jython-elementtree/ ???
Note that this ships with Jython 2.5.
Stefan
--
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Lipska the Kat lip...@lipskathekat.com wrote:
Is Python truly OO or is it just one way to use the language. I see some
documentation relating to classes but nothing on instantiation .. in fact
the documentation appears to say that classes are used in a static
In article XnsA0927750022F4duncanbooth@127.0.0.1,
Duncan Booth duncan.bo...@suttoncourtenay.org.uk wrote:
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:30:47 +, Albert van der Horst wrote:
The worst of is, of course, = for assignment instead of := .
Welcome!
Am 17.07.2012 10:45, schrieb Lipska the Kat:
I was expecting (hoping) to see in depth documentation relating to Class
construction, extension mechanisms and runtime polymorphism.
In addition to this forum for direct help and discussion, two
suggestions: Firstly, it could help if you
On 17/07/12 10:30, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Welcome!
Am 17.07.2012 10:45, schrieb Lipska the Kat:
I was expecting (hoping) to see in depth documentation relating to Class
construction, extension mechanisms and runtime polymorphism.
In addition to this forum for direct help and discussion, two
Am 17.07.2012 11:06, schrieb andrea crotti:
import unittest
class TestWithRaises(unittest.TestCase):
def test_first(self):
assert False
def test_second(self):
print(also called)
assert True
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
in this case also
On 07/17/2012 07:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
SNIP
Anyway, I'm looking at Python as a rapid prototyping language.
I have an idea and just want to get it down in basic outline code as
quickly as possible before it departs my aging brain... I'm not used
to using variables without declaring
On 17/07/12 11:03, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Lipska the Katlip...@lipskathekat.com wrote:
Is Python truly OO or is it just one way to use the language. I see some
documentation relating to classes but nothing on instantiation .. in fact
the documentation appears
On 7/17/2012 6:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Anyway, I'm looking at Python as a rapid prototyping language.
I have an idea and just want to get it down in basic outline code as
quickly as possible before it departs my aging brain... I'm not used to
using variables without declaring their type
On 17/07/12 12:37, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 7/17/2012 6:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Anyway, I'm looking at Python as a rapid prototyping language.
snip
Pythonic is (or at least should be) a word you encounter frequently in
discussions of Python code. Learn what is considered Pythonic and then
On 7/17/2012 6:44 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
I'll check it out, thanks.
I forgot to add this:
http://wiki.python.org/moin/Python2orPython3
It's a little outdated (there is more progress toward py3k by 3rd-party
libraries every day), but still quite helpful.
--
CPython 3.3.0b1 | Windows NT
On 17/07/12 09:45, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Pythoners
Python 2.7.3
Ubuntu Linux 12.04 LTS
I've been taking a brief look at Python.
snip
Well I've set myself a task.
I have a text file containing a list of stock items
each line contains the number in stock followed by a tab followed by the
The standard is to use `cls`. In the __new__ method you can use `mcl` or `meta`.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Andrew Berg wrote:
To put it in duck-typing terms, why should everything have to quack like
True or False? Sure, I can see why 1 quacks like True or [] quacks like
False, but I don't see why say, a Logger or function should quack like
either. Should a Thread object be True if it's been started
On 2012-07-17 10:23, Andrew Berg wrote:
I don't want that, but I am suggesting that it would be consistent with
the idea of something or nothing.
Don't confuse names and objects. You can only test the truth value of
objects. If you don't have a name in a namespace, then it means you
don't have
Not really. It doesn't quack like anything.
Actually, there is no it. So we cannot talk about how it quacks. :-D
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Am 17.07.2012 13:01, schrieb Lipska the Kat:
On 17/07/12 10:30, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Am 17.07.2012 10:45, schrieb Lipska the Kat:
I was expecting (hoping) to see in depth documentation relating to Class
construction, extension mechanisms and runtime polymorphism.
In addition to this forum
On 17/07/2012 12:01, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Anyway, I'm looking at Python as a rapid prototyping language.
Lipska
One of the huge advantages of Python here is that you can simply blast
stuff into the interactive prompt and see what happens, no need to write
a script.
--
Cheers.
Mark
On 17/07/2012 12:44, Lipska the Kat wrote:
You're not kidding, the 'duck' example at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_typing made me check I hadn't overdone
the medication this morning. That is just plain ...weird. It will take
me a while to form non knee jerk opinions of this for sure.
Hi,
I am trying to install Python 2.6 on Mac OS Lion. Here is what I did:
1- Download Mac Installer disk image (2.6) (sig) from
http://www.python.org/getit/releases/2.6/
2- Install it
3- Run Python Luncher, go to Python Luncher preferences, and change the
interpreter to
In article -8sdnvrxgqie25jnnz2dnuvz7qkdn...@bt.com,
Lipska the Kat lip...@lipskathekat.com wrote:
I'm not used to using variables without declaring their type
If you truly wanted to recreate this type-bondage style of programming
in Python, it's easy enough to do.
Where you would write in
I am having a problem configuring a listbox widget such that the selection
remains highlighted even while it is set (programmatically) to the DISABLED
state. Below code shows the problem:
from Tkinter import *
master = Tk()
listbox = Listbox(master)
listbox.pack()
listbox.insert(END, Text1)
On 17/07/12 12:37, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 7/17/2012 6:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
snip
On a side note, I would highly recommend learning Python 3 (3.2 is the
latest stable version) unless you have an explicit need for Python 2
(some major 3rd-party libraries have not been ported yet). Python
Chris Rebert於 2012年7月16日星期一UTC+8上午9時38分53秒寫道：
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 6:26 PM, hamilton lt;hamil...@nothere.comgt; wrote:
gt; Subject: Diagramming code
gt;
gt; Is there any software to help understand python code ?
What sort of diagrams? Control flow diagrams? Class diagrams? Sequence
On 7/17/2012 9:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Wow, that was a blast from the past
Just downloaded, unzipped, untarred, configured, made and installed
python 3.2.3 ... it's YEARS since I've done this, makes me feel young again.
Most Linux distributions should have a premade package for stable
On 17/07/12 14:52, Roy Smith wrote:
In article-8sdnvrxgqie25jnnz2dnuvz7qkdn...@bt.com,
Lipska the Katlip...@lipskathekat.com wrote:
I'm not used to using variables without declaring their type
If you truly wanted to recreate this type-bondage style of programming
in Python, it's easy
On 17/07/12 15:16, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 7/17/2012 9:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Wow, that was a blast from the past
Just downloaded, unzipped, untarred, configured, made and installed
python 3.2.3 ... it's YEARS since I've done this, makes me feel young again.
Most Linux distributions should
On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 06:55:21 AM Sarbjit singh wrote:
I am having a problem configuring a listbox widget such that the selection
remains highlighted even while it is set (programmatically) to the
DISABLED
state. Below code shows the problem:
from Tkinter import *
master = Tk()
On 17/07/2012 15:23, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 14:52, Roy Smith wrote:
In article-8sdnvrxgqie25jnnz2dnuvz7qkdn...@bt.com,
Lipska the Katlip...@lipskathekat.com wrote:
I'm not used to using variables without declaring their type
If you truly wanted to recreate this type-bondage
On 17/07/12 15:47:05, Naser Nikandish wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install Python 2.6 on Mac OS Lion. Here is what I did:
1- Download Mac Installer disk image (2.6) (sig) from
http://www.python.org/getit/releases/2.6/
2- Install it
3- Run Python Luncher, go to Python Luncher
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Michele Simionato
michele.simion...@gmail.com wrote:
The standard is to use `cls`. In the __new__ method you can use `mcl` or
`meta`.
I've also seen `mcs` a fair amount.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:10 AM, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 17, 1:29 am, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Here's a style question for you: in a metaclass, what should I call the
instance parameter of methods, cls or self?
Maybe portmanteu it as
Hi,
Any reason why a blank Tk() window opens up when I run my code:
Code:
for run in range(RUNS):
waittime = Monitor2()
checkouttime = Monitor2()
totaltimeinshop = Monitor2()
checkout_aisle = Simulation.Resource(AISLES)
Simulation.initialize()
cf = Customer_Market()
On 17/07/12 17:26, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 15:23, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 14:52, Roy Smith wrote:
snip
Still, I'm sure you're only kidding around with me :-)
Kidding around on a Python mailing list, never, how dare you Sir, simply
wouldn't be cricket :-)
As in The
On Jul 17, 9:32 am, Shamefaced manengstud...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Any reason why a blank Tk() window opens up when I run my code:
Code:
for run in range(RUNS):
waittime = Monitor2()
checkouttime = Monitor2()
totaltimeinshop = Monitor2()
checkout_aisle =
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
'type-bondage' is the requirement to restrict function inputs and output
to one declared type, where the type
On 7/17/2012 8:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 09:45, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Pythoners
Python 2.7.3
Ubuntu Linux 12.04 LTS
I've been taking a brief look at Python.
snip
Well I've set myself a task.
I have a text file containing a list of stock items
each line contains the number
On 7/17/2012 10:16 AM, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 7/17/2012 9:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Wow, that was a blast from the past
Just downloaded, unzipped, untarred, configured, made and installed
python 3.2.3 ... it's YEARS since I've done this, makes me feel young again.
Most Linux distributions
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
'type-bondage' is the requirement to restrict function inputs and output
to one declared type,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:34 PM, tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote:
It's so fundamental to most GUIs that single-click
and double-click allow one to do different things with the same object
Kinda yes, kinda no. Most GUIs and GUI recommendations would either
enforce or strongly suggest that the
On 17/07/2012 18:24, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 8:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 09:45, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Pythoners
Python 2.7.3
Ubuntu Linux 12.04 LTS
I've been taking a brief look at Python.
snip
Well I've set myself a task.
I have a text file containing a list of
import unittest
class TestWithRaises(unittest.TestCase):
def test_first(self):
assert False
def test_second(self):
print(also called)
assert True
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
in this case also the second test is
On 07/17/12 12:24, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 8:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
In bash this is laughably trivial
sort -nr $1 | head -${2:-10}
Won't sort work alphabetically and leave the following as is?
1\talpha
11\tbeta
2\tgamma
Only if Lipska had omitted the -n which tells sort
On 7/17/2012 4:23 AM, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 7/17/2012 2:08 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
The default behaviour is that every object is something, hence true-like,
unless explicitly coded to be treated as false-like. Since both loggers
and functions are objects, they are true-like unless the
On 7/17/2012 12:30 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
(In some ways, it is already better than 3.2.3.)
I certainly make heavy use of some of the new features. I'm not sure we
can have enough separate exceptions for OS errors without exhausting
every possibility and I might start looking for excuses to use
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Lipska the Kat
lip...@lipskathekat.com wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug) but
I'm not about to get into some religious war about declaring a variables
On 07/17/12 12:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
'type-bondage' is the requirement to restrict function
On 17/07/2012 18:49, Prasad, Ramit wrote:
import unittest
class TestWithRaises(unittest.TestCase):
def test_first(self):
assert False
def test_second(self):
print(also called)
assert True
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
in this case
On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
'type-bondage' is the requirement to restrict
On 17/07/12 18:24, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 8:01 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 09:45, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Pythoners
Python 2.7.3
Ubuntu Linux 12.04 LTS
I've been taking a brief look at Python.
snip
Well I've set myself a task.
I have a text file containing a list of
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time
type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
'type-bondage' is the
On 7/17/2012 5:06 AM, andrea crotti wrote:
Well this is what I meant:
import unittest
class TestWithRaises(unittest.TestCase):
def test_first(self):
assert False
def test_second(self):
print(also called)
assert True
if __name__ == '__main__':
On 17/07/12 19:18, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time
type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
'type-bondage' is the requirement to restrict function inputs and output to
one declared type, where the type declaration mechanisms are usually quite
limited.
This is interesting, I hadn't expected that sort of definition.
On 17/07/12 18:07, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
snip
How easy was it to write max, or a universal sort in Java?
Well
On 17/07/2012 19:43, Ethan Furman wrote:
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time
type
checking and making code easier to read (and
On 17/07/2012 20:29, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 18:07, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time type
checking and making code easier to read (and therefor debug
snip
How easy was it to
On 17/07/2012 19:43, Ethan Furman wrote:
Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile
time type
checking and making code easier to read (and
On 17/07/12 20:39, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 20:29, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 18:07, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
snip
How easy was it to write max, or a universal sort in Java?
Well java.lang.Math.max() (or min() depending on what you
In article 5005927a$0$6949$e4fe5...@news2.news.xs4all.nl,
Hans Mulder han...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 17/07/12 15:47:05, Naser Nikandish wrote:
I am trying to install Python 2.6 on Mac OS Lion. Here is what I did:
1- Download Mac Installer disk image (2.6) (sig) from
On 17/07/2012 18:49, Prasad, Ramit wrote:
import unittest
class TestWithRaises(unittest.TestCase):
def test_first(self):
assert False
def test_second(self):
print(also called)
assert True
if __name__ == '__main__':
Hi all,
I'm having a strange behavior when executing the following script:
---
import multiprocessing
def f(i):
return i
p = multiprocessing.Pool()
for i in range(20):
def c(r):
print r, i
p.apply_async(f, (i,) , callback=c)
p.close()
p.join()
nuffi,
Have you tried running your piped commands
c:\Programs\bob\bob.exe -x -y C:\text\path\to some\file.txt |
c:\Programs\kate\kate.exe -A 2 --dc Print Media Is Dead --da Author
--dt Title --hf Times --bb 14 --aa --font Ariel -
C:\rtf\path\to some\file.rtf
in a single instance of
On 07/17/2012 11:44 PM, André Panisson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having a strange behavior when executing the following script:
---
import multiprocessing
def f(i):
return i
p = multiprocessing.Pool()
for i in range(20):
def c(r):
print r, i
To clarify my problem, I just thought that assertRaises if used as
context manager should behave as following:
- keep going if the exception declared is raised
- re-raise an error even if catched after the declared exception was catched
I was also confused by the doc a bit:
Test that an
In Foxpro if you do a
GOTO 7
with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
move (at least in version 6).
I don't like that.
I see four other options:
0) don't move the pointer (listed for completeness)
1) go to that record anyway
2) go to the next undeleted record
3)
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
In Foxpro if you do a
GOTO 7
with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
move (at least in version 6).
I don't like that.
I see four other options:
0) don't move the pointer (listed for
On 17/07/2012 23:57, Ethan Furman wrote:
In Foxpro if you do a
GOTO 7
with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
move (at least in version 6).
I don't like that.
I see four other options:
0) don't move the pointer (listed for completeness)
1) go to that record
On 17/07/2012 19:36, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 19:18, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange way of thinking about compile time
type
checking and making code
On Jul 17, 6:23 pm, Andrew Berg bahamutzero8...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/17/2012 2:08 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
The default behaviour is that every object is something, hence true-like,
unless explicitly coded to be treated as false-like. Since both loggers
and functions are objects, they are
mmdionisio1...@yahoo.com.ph
Just a newbhie here :
From: python-list-requ...@python.org python-list-requ...@python.org
To: mmdionisio1...@yahoo.com.ph
Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2012 7:41 PM
Subject: Welcome to the Python-list mailing list
Welcome to the
Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
In Foxpro if you do a
GOTO 7
with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
move (at least in version 6).
I don't like that.
I see four other options:
0) don't move the pointer
MRAB wrote:
On 17/07/2012 23:57, Ethan Furman wrote:
In Foxpro if you do a
GOTO 7
with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
move (at least in version 6).
I don't like that.
I see four other options:
0) don't move the pointer (listed for completeness)
1) go to
On 18/07/12 11:44, Maria Hanna Carmela Dionisio wrote:
mmdionisio1...@yahoo.com.ph
Just a newbhie here :
[snip]
You must know your password to change your options (including changing
the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. It is:
sweet103093
I suggest you change you password now
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 05:23:22 -0700, Michele Simionato wrote:
The standard is to use `cls`. In the __new__ method you can use `mcl` or
`meta`.
Thanks to everyone who answered.
I think I will stick with meta and cls.
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 18/07/2012 03:19, Ethan Furman wrote:
MRAB wrote:
On 17/07/2012 23:57, Ethan Furman wrote:
In Foxpro if you do a
GOTO 7
with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
move (at least in version 6).
I don't like that.
I see four other options:
0) don't move the
在 2012年7月17日星期二UTC+8下午6时02分31秒，Stefan Behnel写道：
Matej Cepl, 17.07.2012 11:39:
gt; On 17/07/12 10:35, gaodexiaozh...@gmail.com wrote:
gt;gt;gt; amp;gt; Iamp;#39;m trying to parse an xml file with jython
(not through java
gt;gt;gt; parsers
gt;gt;gt; amp;gt; like xerces).
gt;
gt;
MRAB wrote:
On 18/07/2012 03:19, Ethan Furman wrote:
MRAB wrote:
On 17/07/2012 23:57, Ethan Furman wrote:
In Foxpro if you do a
GOTO 7
with deleted off and record 7 is deleted, the record pointer doesn't
move (at least in version 6).
I don't like that.
I see four other options:
0) don't
On Jul 18, 5:46 am, Andrew Cooper am...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On 17/07/2012 19:36, Lipska the Kat wrote:
On 17/07/12 19:18, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 17/07/2012 18:29, Ethan Furman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2012 10:23 AM, Lipska the Kat wrote:
Well 'type-bondage' is a strange
Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'd like to work on this if that's okay. I've already written test cases for
issue 7559 and issue 15299 that required creating temporary packages, so I
understand the need. And I'd also like to create test cases for issue 14787,
New submission from Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com:
This issue is to refactor the create-package code in test_runpy into a helper
module, as suggested in issue 15358.
This is a prerequisite to moving the pkgutil.walk_package() tests from
test_runpy into test_pkgutil.
--
Changes by Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com:
--
dependencies: +Refactor the create-package code in test_runpy into a helper
module
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15358
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Yes, there are a number of third-party utility packages (and many,
many e.g. personal custom bash prompts) that check the value of the
$VIRTUAL_ENV variable to detect whether one is currently active, and
display its name. Unless there's an
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
