Hi everyone,
I'm pleased to announce you Autoflight 1.0, a simple script to upload a
given .apk or .ipa to TestFlight. Autoflight is open source, if you want to
improve it please send me a pull request. You can find your repository on
Github at https://github.com/atooma/autoflight
Installing
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 PM, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
Its a more fundamental problem than that:
It emerges from the OP's second post) that he wants '-' in the attributes.
Is that all?
Where does this syntax-enlargement stop? Spaces? Newlines?
At non-strings.
setattr(foo,
Thank you a lot for your case description.
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Dan Sommers wrote:
It begets the question, that if it is easier to write a
socket-listening loging handler and forget all about
logging.config.listen() stuff. I never did it before, hence the
question.
But why develop all of that
On 12/03/2013 09:45 PM, Tim Roberts wrote:
Piotr Dobrogost p...@google-groups-2013.dobrogost.net wrote:
Attribute access syntax being very concise is very often preferred
to dict's interface.
It is not very concise. It is slightly more concise.
x = obj.value1
x = dct['value1']
Hi all
There is no question at the end of this, it is just an account of a couple
of days in the life of a programmer (me). I just felt like sharing it. Feel
free to ignore.
The business/accounting system I am writing involves a lot of reading data
from a database, and if changed, writing it
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 04:40:26 -0800, rusi wrote:
On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 5:48:59 PM UTC+5:30, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to extracted elements from a heapq in a for loop.
I feel my solution below is much too complicated.
How to do it more elegantly?
I know I could use a while
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:38:58 +0100, Peter Otten wrote:
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to extracted elements from a heapq in a for loop.
I feel my solution below is much too complicated.
How to do it more elegantly?
I know I could use a while loop but I don't like it.
Many thanks
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:06:05 +, Duncan Booth wrote:
Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to extracted elements from a heapq in a for loop.
I feel my solution below is much too complicated.
How to do it more elegantly?
I know I could use a while loop but
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 15:56:11 +0200, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
Helmut Jarausch writes:
...
I know I could use a while loop but I don't like it.
...
from heapq import heappush, heappop
# heappop raises IndexError if heap is empty
...
# how to avoid / simplify the following function
def
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 08:13:03 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 03Dec2013 12:18, Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
I'd like to extracted elements from a heapq in a for loop.
I feel my solution below is much too complicated.
How to do it more elegantly?
I can't believe
iMath redstone-c...@163.com wrote:
I use the following code to do the test ,but error occurred ,it
prompts system cannot find specified files ,but the files are indeed
exists there ,any help ?
with tempfile.TemporaryFile() as fp:
fp.write((file '+'a1.mp3'+'\n).encode('utf-8'))
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:38:58 +0100, Peter Otten wrote:
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to extracted elements from a heapq in a for loop.
I feel my solution below is much too complicated.
How to do it more elegantly?
I know I could use a while loop but I
Frank Millman wrote:
Hi all
There is no question at the end of this, it is just an account of a couple
of days in the life of a programmer (me). I just felt like sharing it.
Feel free to ignore.
The business/accounting system I am writing involves a lot of reading data
from a database,
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 2:27:28 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 PM, rusi wrote:
Its a more fundamental problem than that:
It emerges from the OP's second post) that he wants '-' in the attributes.
Is that all?
Where does this syntax-enlargement stop? Spaces?
Hi all
This is my first post on this list :-)
I have a web-application (developped using a python framework). In this
web-app, I would like to print certificates for some courses.
The principle :
The course teacher has a default certificates, with placeholders for the
name, and the
Op 04-12-13 11:09, rusi schreef:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 2:27:28 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 PM, rusi wrote:
Its a more fundamental problem than that:
It emerges from the OP's second post) that he wants '-' in the attributes.
Is that all?
Where does this
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:09 PM, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
OP wants attribute identifiers like outer_fieldset-inner_fieldset-third_field.
Say I have a python expression:
obj.outer_fieldset-inner_fieldset-third_field
I don't think so. What the OP asked for was:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Andreas Perstinger andiper...@gmail.com wrote:
fp is a file object, but subprocess expects a list of strings as
its first argument.
More fundamentally: The subprocess's arguments must include the *name*
of the file. This means you can't use TemporaryFile at all,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Zhang Weiwu tris...@realss.com wrote:
Either case I don't find use of logging.config.listen(), even though I am
looking hard for every way to reuse existing code.
That's not a problem. It's a feature that doesn't quite fit your task,
so you don't use it. It's
loic.esp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
This is my first post on this list :-)
I have a web-application (developped using a python framework). In this
web-app, I would like to print certificates for some courses.
The principle :
The course teacher has a default certificates, with
On 2013-12-04 21:33, Chris Angelico wrote:
I don't think so. What the OP asked for was:
my_object.'valid-attribute-name-but-not-valid-identifier'
Or describing it another way: A literal string instead of a token.
This is conceivable, at least, but I don't think it gives any
advantage over
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 4:03:14 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:09 PM, rusi wrote:
OP wants attribute identifiers like
outer_fieldset-inner_fieldset-third_field.
Say I have a python expression:
obj.outer_fieldset-inner_fieldset-third_field
I don't
rusi writes:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 2:27:28 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 PM, rusi wrote:
Its a more fundamental problem than that:
It emerges from the OP's second post) that he wants '-' in the
attributes. Is that all?
Where does this
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Jussi Piitulainen
jpiit...@ling.helsinki.fi wrote:
Hm. Can't specific classes be made to behave this way even now by
implementing suitable underscored methods?
Yup. Definitely possible. I don't think it'd be a good idea, though,
not without somehow changing
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 3:59:06 PM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 04-12-13 11:09, rusi schreef:
I used the spaces case to indicate the limit of chaos.
Other characters (that
already have uses) are just as problematic.
I don't agree with the latter. As it is now python can make
Op 04-12-13 13:01, rusi schreef:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 3:59:06 PM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 04-12-13 11:09, rusi schreef:
I used the spaces case to indicate the limit of chaos.
Other characters (that
already have uses) are just as problematic.
I don't agree with the
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 6:02:18 PM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 04-12-13 13:01, rusi schreef:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 3:59:06 PM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 04-12-13 11:09, rusi schreef:
I used the spaces case to indicate the limit of chaos.
Other characters
In article 17gt99hg615jfm7bdid26185884d2pf...@4ax.com,
Tim Roberts t...@probo.com wrote:
Piotr Dobrogost p...@google-groups-2013.dobrogost.net wrote:
Attribute access syntax being very concise is very often preferred
to dict's interface.
It is not very concise. It is slightly more
I'm tasked with writing a 'simple' ElementTree based parser with support for
unknown entities eg foo;.
This code derived from FL's old documentation fails in both python 2 and 3.
import xml.etree.ElementTree as ET
try:
ascii
except:
from future_builtins import
Le mardi 3 décembre 2013 15:26:45 UTC+1, Ethan Furman a écrit :
On 12/02/2013 12:38 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 11/29/2013 04:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Out of the nine tests, Python 3.3 passes six, with three tests being
failures or dubious. If you believe that the native
On 04/12/2013 13:52, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip all the double spaced stuff]
Yon intuitively pointed a very important feature
of unicode. However, it is not necessary, this is
exactly what unicode does (when used properly).
jmf
Presumably using unicode correctly prevents messages
On 2013-12-04, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/12/2013 5:13 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
You poor fools you, this is what happens when you give control
of the tools you use to a (near) monopolist whose incentives
are not your incentives.
To paraphrase Franklin: those who would give up
On 2013-12-04, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Yon intuitively pointed a very important feature of unicode.
However, it is not necessary, this is exactly what unicode does
(when used properly).
Unicode only provides character sets. It's not a natural language
parsing facility.
(comments from a lurker on python-list)
- Google groups is a disaster. It's extremely poorly-run, and is in
fact a disservice to Usenet -- which is alive and well, tyvm, and still used
by many of the most senior and experienced people on the Internet. (While
some newsgroups are languishing and
On 04/12/2013 14:34, Neil Cerutti wrote:
On 2013-12-04, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/12/2013 5:13 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
You poor fools you, this is what happens when you give control
of the tools you use to a (near) monopolist whose incentives
are not your incentives.
To
The source code:
for i in range(8):
n = input()
When we run it, consider the numbers below is the user input,
1
2
3
4
5
6
(and so forth)
my question, can i make it in just a single line like,
1 2 3 4 5 6 (and so forth)
Can I?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
Mailing lists/Usenet newsgroups remain, as they've been for a very
long time, the solutions of choice for online discussions. Yes, I'm
aware of web forums: I've used hundreds of them. They suck. They ALL
suck, they just all
On 2013-12-04 07:38, geezl...@gmail.com wrote:
for i in range(8):
n = input()
When we run it, consider the numbers below is the user input,
1
2
3
4
5
6
(and so forth)
my question, can i make it in just a single line like,
1 2 3 4 5 6 (and so forth)
Not easily while
On 2013-12-04, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
On 30Nov2013 14:25, pec...@pascolo.net pec...@pascolo.net wrote:
Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.com writes:
[NNTP] clients provide full-fledged editors
and conversely full-fledged editors provide
NNTP clients
GNU Emacs is a
On 04/12/2013 15:38, geezl...@gmail.com wrote:
The source code:
for i in range(8):
n = input()
When we run it, consider the numbers below is the user input,
1
2
3
4
5
6
(and so forth)
my question, can i make it in just a single line like,
1 2 3 4 5 6 (and so forth)
Can I?
Yes you
On 2013-12-04 09:55, Tim Chase wrote:
You could make it a bit more robust with something like:
answers = []
while len(answers) 8:
s = input()
answers.append(s.split())
this should be
answers.extend(s.split())
instead of .append()
That's what I get for coding in my inbox
On 04/12/2013 15:50, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-12-04, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
On 30Nov2013 14:25, pec...@pascolo.net pec...@pascolo.net wrote:
Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.com writes:
[NNTP] clients provide full-fledged editors
and conversely full-fledged editors
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 04/12/2013 15:38, geezl...@gmail.com wrote:
The source code:
for i in range(8):
n = input()
Yes you can get them on a single line, see the response from Tim Chase. But
just to be crystal clear, are you
On 12/04/2013 08:38 AM, geezl...@gmail.com wrote:
my question, can i make it in just a single line like,
1 2 3 4 5 6 (and so forth)
Can I?
Yes of course. raw_input() is going to give you a string that you can
then parse any way you want.
--
On 12/4/13 11:07 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 04/12/2013 15:50, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-12-04, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
On 30Nov2013 14:25, pec...@pascolo.net pec...@pascolo.net wrote:
Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.com writes:
[NNTP] clients provide full-fledged
On 24/10/2013 22:47, Mark Lawrence wrote:
The new module is now five years old. PEP 429 Python 3.4 release
schedule has it listed under Other proposed large-scale changes but I
don't believe this is actually happening. Lots of issues on the bug
tracker have been closed as fixed in the new
On 04/12/2013 16:14, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 04/12/2013 15:38, geezl...@gmail.com wrote:
The source code:
for i in range(8):
n = input()
Yes you can get them on a single line, see the response from Tim
On Dec 4, 2013, at 6:52 AM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
Yes, I'm
aware of web forums: I've used hundreds of them. They suck. They ALL
suck, they just all suck differently. I could spend the next several
thousand lines explaining why, but instead I'll just abbreviate: they
don't
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I'm contemplating what it would be like migrating code from Python 1.x to
Python 4.0, the fun and games that could be :)
I never used Python 1.x seriously, but when I went digging in one of
my OS/2 machines a while
On 04/12/2013 16:21, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 12/4/13 11:07 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 04/12/2013 15:50, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-12-04, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au wrote:
On 30Nov2013 14:25, pec...@pascolo.net pec...@pascolo.net wrote:
Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.com
On 04/12/2013 16:23, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 12/04/2013 08:38 AM, geezl...@gmail.com wrote:
my question, can i make it in just a single line like,
1 2 3 4 5 6 (and so forth)
Can I?
Yes of course. raw_input() is going to give you a string that you can
then parse any way you want.
That's
On 12/04/2013 03:30 AM, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
rusi writes:
How do we decide which '-' are valid identifier components --
hyphens and which minus-signs?
I think the OP might be after the JavaScript mechanism where an
attribute name can be any string, the indexing brackets are always
Op 04-12-13 14:02, rusi schreef:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 6:02:18 PM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 04-12-13 13:01, rusi schreef:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 3:59:06 PM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 04-12-13 11:09, rusi schreef:
I used the spaces case to indicate the limit of
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 6:45:05 AM UTC+1, Tim Roberts wrote:
It is not very concise. It is slightly more concise.
x = obj.value1
x = dct['value1']
You have saved 3 keystrokes.
Actually only 1 as you should have compared these:
x = obj.'value-1'
x = dct['value-1']
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 2:06:44 AM UTC+1, Tim Chase wrote:
I think random832 is saying that the designed purpose of setattr()
was to dynamically set attributes by name, so they could later be
accessed the traditional way; not designed from the ground-up to
support non-identifier names.
On 04/12/2013 20:35, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 2:06:44 AM UTC+1, Tim Chase wrote:
I think random832 is saying that the designed purpose of setattr()
was to dynamically set attributes by name, so they could later be
accessed the traditional way; not designed from the
On 12/04/2013 12:07 PM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
If there ought to be only one way to access attributes then it should
be dot notation.
Not only one way, it's one obvious way.
The obvious way to deal with objects that do not have legal identifier names is
with a dict.
--
~Ethan~
--
On 04/12/2013 20:22, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 12/04/2013 12:07 PM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
If there ought to be only one way to access attributes then it should
be dot notation.
Not only one way, it's one obvious way.
--
~Ethan~
Not one obvious way it's There should be one-- and preferably
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Piotr Dobrogost
p...@google-groups-2013.dobrogost.net wrote:
Right. If there's already a way to have attributes with these non-standard
names (which is a good thing) then for uniformity with dot access to
attributes with standard names there should be a variant
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 2:23:24 PM UTC+1, Roy Smith wrote:
In article 17gt99hg615jfm7bdid26185884d2pf...@4ax.com,
Tim Roberts wrote:
Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
Attribute access syntax being very concise is very often preferred
to dict's interface.
It is not very concise.
On 12/04/2013 12:58 PM, Jerry Hill wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Piotr Dobrogost
p...@google-groups-2013.dobrogost.net wrote:
Right. If there's already a way to have attributes with these non-standard names (which is a good
thing) then for uniformity with dot access to attributes with
On 2013-12-04, Piotr Dobrogost p...@google-groups-2013.dobrogost.net wrote:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 2:06:44 AM UTC+1, Tim Chase wrote:
I think random832 is saying that the designed purpose of setattr()
was to dynamically set attributes by name, so they could later be
accessed the
On 12/04/2013 12:55 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 04/12/2013 20:22, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 12/04/2013 12:07 PM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
If there ought to be only one way to access attributes then it should
be dot notation.
Not only one way, it's one obvious way.
Not one obvious way it's
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 10:41:49 PM UTC+1, Neil Cerutti wrote:
not something to do commonly. Your proposed syntax leaves the
distinction between valid and invalid identifiers a problem the
programmer has to deal with. It doesn't unify access to
attributes the way the getattr and
On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 6:48:38 PM UTC+1, Dave Angel wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:14:49 -0800 (PST), Piotr Dobrogost
wrote:
What is the reason there's no natural syntax allowing to access
attributes with names not being valid Python identifiers in a similar
way to other
On 12/4/2013 3:07 PM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
You have proposed to make non-identifier attribute names 'official',
rather than discouraged, by abbreviating
x = getattr(obj, 'value-1')
or
x = obj.__dict__['value-1'] # implementation detail
as
x = obj.'value-1'
The discussion of enlarging
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 10:41:49 PM UTC+1, Neil Cerutti wrote:
On 2013-12-04, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
Right. If there's already a way to have attributes with these
non-standard names (which is a good thing)
At best its a neutral thing. You can use dict for the same
purpose with
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:05:11 -0800 (PST), Piotr Dobrogost
p...@google-groups-2013.dobrogost.net wrote:
Object's attributes and dictionary's keys are quite different
things.
Right. So if you need arbitrary keys, use a dict. Attributes are
keyed by identifiers, which are constrained. No problem.
On 03Dec2013 17:39, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 6:10:05 AM UTC+5:30, Cameron Simpson wrote:
My first act on joining any mailing list is to download the entire
archive into my local mail store. I have a script for this, for
mailman at least.
and you
On 12/04/2013 02:13 PM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 10:41:49 PM UTC+1, Neil Cerutti wrote:
On 2013-12-04, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
Right. If there's already a way to have attributes with these
non-standard names (which is a good thing)
At best its a neutral thing.
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 11:11:56 PM UTC+1, Terry Reedy wrote:
The discussion of enlarging the scope of 'identifier' is not relevant as
you are not proposing that. In particular, you are not asking that
obj.value-1 get the 'value-1' attribute of obj.
Right.
The discussion of
On Thursday, December 5, 2013 12:09:52 AM UTC+1, Ethan Furman wrote:
Perhaps you should look
at different ways of spelling your identifiers? Why can't you use an
underscore instead of a hyphen?
So that underscore could be left for use inside fields' names?
However I think we could use some
On 12/04/2013 03:57 PM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
On Thursday, December 5, 2013 12:09:52 AM UTC+1, Ethan Furman wrote:
Perhaps you should look at different ways of spelling your identifiers?
Why can't you use an underscore instead of a hyphen?
So that underscore could be left for use inside
In article mailman.3565.1386170444.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
Yes, I'm
aware of web forums: I've used hundreds of them. They suck. They ALL
suck, they just all suck differently. I could spend the next several
thousand lines explaining why, but instead
In article mailman.3594.1386203271.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Spaces? I present to you two FORTRAN statements
DO 10 I = 3 . 14159
and
DO10I = 3 , 1 4 1 5 9
Which is the loop
On 12/4/13 6:57 PM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
On Thursday, December 5, 2013 12:09:52 AM UTC+1, Ethan Furman wrote:
Perhaps you should look
at different ways of spelling your identifiers? Why can't you use an
underscore instead of a hyphen?
So that underscore could be left for use inside fields'
Hi Victor,
I use PyCharm which is set up by default to warn when line length exceeds 120
chars, not 80. Perhaps times have changed?
I often break comprehensions at the for, in and else clauses. It's often not
for line length reasons but because it's easier to follow the code that way. I
have
On 04/12/2013 20:07, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
[...]
Unless we compare with what we have now, which gives 9 (without space) or 10
(with space):
x = obj.'value-1'
x = getattr(obj, 'value-1')
That is not a significant enough savings to create new syntax.
Well, 9 characters is probably
On 04Dec2013 09:44, Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 08:13:03 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
I iterate over Queues so often that I have a personal class called
a QueueIterator which is a wrapper for a Queue or PriorityQueue
which is iterable, and an
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:09 AM, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 2:27:28 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 PM, rusi wrote:
Its a more fundamental problem than that:
It emerges from the OP's second post) that he wants '-' in the attributes.
On 12/4/2013 3:46 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 04/12/2013 20:35, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 2:06:44 AM UTC+1, Tim Chase wrote:
I think random832 is saying that the designed purpose of setattr()
was to dynamically set attributes by name, so they could later be
On 12/04/2013 06:58 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 12/4/2013 3:46 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 04/12/2013 20:35, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
there should be a variant of dot access allowing to access
these non-standard named attributes, too.
More opinion. I am sure that I am not the only developer who
On 12/4/2013 6:42 PM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 11:11:56 PM UTC+1, Terry Reedy wrote:
The discussion of keystrokes is also a side-track.
To great degree, yes. Having said that I find extra 11 keystrokes
needed to access some attributes to be a freaking big and
The third clause of the PSF license requires you to include a brief summary of
changes in Python-derived software. Why? How exactly to comply with it? I think
that this condition is not suitable for using Python in closed-source software.
I suggest to remove it.
--
In article mailman.3602.1386214314.18130.python-l...@python.org,
musicdenotat...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that's the kind of software license I like. Short, and easy to
understand.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 12/4/2013 10:17 PM, musicdenotat...@gmail.com wrote:
The third clause of the PSF license requires you to include a brief
summary of changes in Python-derived software.
In the event Licensee prepares a derivative work that is based on or
incorporates Python 3.3.3 or any part thereof, and
On 12/4/2013 11:21 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 24/10/2013 22:47, Mark Lawrence wrote:
The new module is now five years old. PEP 429 Python 3.4 release
schedule has it listed under Other proposed large-scale changes but I
don't believe this is actually happening. Lots of issues on the bug
On Thursday, December 5, 2013 8:13:49 AM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:09 AM, rusi wrote:
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 2:27:28 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 PM, rusi wrote:
Its a more fundamental problem than that:
It emerges from the OP's
Christian Heimes added the comment:
I'd like to see the warning silenced before 3.4 gets released, too. How about a
check like
(Py_ssize_t)msg-msg_controllen 0xL
instead? I'd also be fine with pragmas.
--
nosy: +christian.heimes
versions: +Python 3.4
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Alexandre, if you have enough memory, could you please check that memory
requirements for bigmem tests are correct?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19881
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
stage: needs patch - patch review
type: - enhancement
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18840
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Here is a patch with new bigmem limits. Currently bigmem tests consumes much
more memory than they declare. This can cause memory swapping and too long time
of test's running.
--
Added file:
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
Limiting the cache size is also not a solution in the
practical example with request that I linked to in the
previous comment, because we can't know in advance how
many times per request the function is going to be called,
picking an arbitrary number
New submission from Christian Heimes:
MSVC complains about conversion from 'Py_ssize_t' to 'long', possible loss of
data in zipimport.c. header_offset is a Py_ssize_t but fseek() only takes a
long. On 64bit Windows Py_ssize_t is a 64bit data type but long is still a
32bit data type.
It's
STINNER Victor added the comment:
read_directory() uses fseek() and ftell() which don't support offset larger
than LONG_MAX (2 GB on 32-bit system). I don't know if it's an issue. What
happens if the file is longer?
header_offset += arc_offset; can overflow or not? This instuction looks
STINNER Victor added the comment:
See also zipfile.py which is probably more correct than zipimport.c: zipfile
uses for example L format for struct.unpack (*unsigned* long) to decode
header fields.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Christian Heimes added the comment:
New patch with fixes for element_ass_subscr().
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file32971/elementtree_overflow2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19687
Radomir Dopieralski added the comment:
Thank you for your attention. I'm actually quite happy with the solution we
have, it works well. That's actually I thought that it may be worthwhile to try
and push it upstream to Python. I can totally understand why you don't want to
add too much to the
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19883
___
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
See also *first* patch in issue16986.
--
nosy: +eli.bendersky, scoder, serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19687
___
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
