New submission from Aaron Brady:
Hi, I asked about the inconsistency of the RuntimeError being raised when
mutating a container while iterating over it here [1], set and dict iteration
on Aug 16, 2012.
[1] http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/python/1004659
I posted a patch on the ML
On Sunday, September 16, 2012 3:01:11 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:38:15 -0700, Aaron Brady wrote:
Here is an example of some repetitive code.
for view_meth in [ dict.items, dict.keys, dict.values ]:
dict0= dict( ( k, None ) for k in range( 10
On Sunday, September 16, 2012 2:42:09 AM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:59:29 -0700, Aaron Brady wrote:
Hello,
I've developing a test script. There's a lot of repetition. I want to
introduce a strategy for approaching it, but I don't want the program
On Friday, September 14, 2012 10:32:47 PM UTC-5, David Hutto wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Dwight Hutto dwightdhu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've developing a test script. There's a lot
Hello,
I've developing a test script. There's a lot of repetition. I want to
introduce a strategy for approaching it, but I don't want the program to be
discredited because of the test script. Therefore, I'd like to know what
people's reactions to and thoughts about it are.
The first
On Monday, September 3, 2012 8:59:16 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:50:57 -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
On 09/03/2012 09:26 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
An unsigned C int can count up to 4,294,967,295. I propose that you say
that is enough iterators for
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 1:11:14 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:49:41 -0700, Aaron Brady wrote:
[...]
The patch for the above is only 40-60 lines. However it introduces two
new concepts.
The first is a linked list, a classic dynamic data
On Monday, September 3, 2012 2:30:24 PM UTC-5, Ian wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
We could use a Python long object for the version index to prevent
overflow. Combined with P. Rubin's idea to count the number of open
iterators, most use
On Monday, September 3, 2012 3:28:28 PM UTC-5, Dave Angel wrote:
On 09/03/2012 04:04 PM, Aaron Brady wrote:
On Monday, September 3, 2012 2:30:24 PM UTC-5, Ian wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
We could use a Python long object
On Monday, August 27, 2012 2:17:45 PM UTC-5, Ian wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
The patch for the above is only 40-60 lines. However it introduces two new
concepts.
Is there a link to the patch?
Please see below. It grew somewhat
On Friday, August 31, 2012 2:22:00 PM UTC-5, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
There are just so many IPC modules out there. I'm looking for a solution
for developing a new a multi-tier application. The core application will
be running on a single computer, so the IPC should be using shared
memory
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 1:11:14 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:49:41 -0700, Aaron Brady wrote:
[...]
The patch for the above is only 40-60 lines. However it introduces two
new concepts.
The first is a linked list, a classic dynamic data
On Saturday, August 18, 2012 9:28:32 PM UTC-5, Aaron Brady wrote:
On Saturday, August 18, 2012 5:14:05 PM UTC-5, MRAB wrote:
On 18/08/2012 21:29, Aaron Brady wrote:
On Friday, August 17, 2012 4:57:41 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Aaron Brady
On Friday, August 17, 2012 4:57:41 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a problem with hacking on the Beta?
Nope. Hack on the beta, then when the release arrives, rebase your
work onto it. I doubt
On Saturday, August 18, 2012 5:14:05 PM UTC-5, MRAB wrote:
On 18/08/2012 21:29, Aaron Brady wrote:
On Friday, August 17, 2012 4:57:41 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a problem with hacking
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 6:07:40 PM UTC-5, Ian wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
The inconsistency is, if we remove an element from a set and add another
during
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 8:01:39 PM UTC-5, Paul Rubin wrote:
Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com writes:
With regard to key insertion and deletion while iterating over a dict
or set, though, there is just no good reason to be doing that
(especially as the result is very
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 9:30:42 PM UTC-5, Paul Rubin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info writes:
Luckily, Python is open source. If anyone thinks that sets and dicts
should include more code protecting against mutation-during-iteration,
they are more
On Thursday, August 16, 2012 9:24:44 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:11:19 -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
On 08/16/2012 05:26 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
Dave Angel d...@davea.name writes:
Everything else is implementation defined. Why should an
implementation be
Hello,
I observed an inconsistency in the behavior of 'set' and 'dict' iterators. It
is by design according to the docs.
'''
http://docs.python.org/dev/library/stdtypes.html#dict-views
iter(dictview). Iterating views while adding or deleting entries in the
dictionary may raise a
On Jun 19, 7:00 am, Rhodri James rho...@wildebst.demon.co.uk
wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:24:34 +0100, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com
wrote:
You are not being any help, Rhodri, in your question.
To you, perhaps not. To me, it has at least had the effect of making
what you're trying
On Jun 20, 9:27 am, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Gustavo Narea wrote:
Hello again, everybody.
Thank you very much for your responses. You guessed right, I didn't
use the __hash__ method (and I forgot to mention that, sorry).
And unfortunately, I think I can't make them
On Jun 17, 3:53 pm, Rhodri James rho...@wildebst.demon.co.uk
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:06:22 +0100, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 16, 10:09 am, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com
On Jun 17, 8:28 pm, per perfr...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
i'm looking for a native python package to run a very simple data
base. i was originally using cpickle with dictionaries for my problem,
but i was making dictionaries out of very large text files (around
1000MB in size) and pickling
On Jun 19, 12:42 pm, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Gustavo Naream...@gustavonarea.net wrote:
Hello, everyone.
I've noticed that if I have a class with so-called rich comparison
methods
(__eq__, __ne__, etc.), when its instances are included in a
On Jun 17, 10:32 am, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 10:23 am, Mensanator mensana...@aol.com wrote:
snip
I think high and low /voltages/, though continuous and approximate,
might satisfy this.
There are no such things as electrons,
I've got a Tesla coil if you'd
On Jun 19, 7:45 am, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
In article
be292347-1011-4bb6-b8e9-a5d738827...@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com,
Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
You are not being any help, Rhodri, in your question.
Maybe not, but honestly, you're getting pretty close
On Jun 18, 6:07 am, Jochen Schulz m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
Terry Reedy:
Jochen Schulz wrote:
If, by object-oriented you mean everything has to be put into
classes, then Python is not object-oriented.
That depends on what you mean by 'put into classes' (and 'everything').
:) What
On Jun 16, 10:09 am, Mike Kazantsev mk.frag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
Making the charitable interpretation that this was the extent of c-l-
py's support and enthusiasm for my idea, I will now go into mourning
On Jun 17, 5:47 am, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.
42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid wrote:
John Yeung a écrit :
But mathematically speaking, it's intuitive that nothing would match
any type.
IOW, what's the OP is after is not the None type, but some yet
unexisting Anything type !-)
The
On Jun 16, 3:48 pm, Zach Hobesh hob...@gmail.com wrote:
A lot more information would be useful. What version of Python, and what
operating system environment? Exactly what would you like to happen when
the batch file is invoked a second time?
I'm running Python 2.6.2 on Windows. I'm
On Jun 17, 1:44 am, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, what
if one wanted to play with exotic logics; how might one do it?
This might be
On Jun 17, 1:28 am, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, what
if one wanted to play with exotic logics; how might one do it?
First question:
On Jun 17, 10:04 am, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
You (OP) may be interested in the definitions of the fuzzy operators:
and( x, y ) := min( x, y )
or( x, y ) := max( x, y )
not( x ) := 1 (one)- x
nand( x, y ) := not( and( x, y ) ) = 1- min( x, y )
Defining 'xor' as '( x
On Jun 17, 10:05 am, pdpi pdpinhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 5:37 pm, Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
I was staring at a logic table the other day, and I asked myself, what
if one wanted to
On Jun 17, 10:23 am, Mensanator mensana...@aol.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 11:59 am, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:44 am, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0700, William Clifford wrote:
I was staring
On Jun 15, 4:56 pm, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 15, 11:10 am, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com writes:
A real-world application of persistent data structures can be found
here:
http://stevekrenzel.com/persistent-list
On Jun 15, 5:45 am, Diez B. Roggisch de...@nospam.web.de wrote:
Aaron Brady wrote:
Hi, please forgive the multi-posting on this general topic.
Some time ago, I recommended a pursuit of keeping 'persistent
composite' types on disk, to be read and updated at other times by
other processes
On Jun 14, 10:18 am, Jaime Fernandez del Rio jaime.f...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Aaron Bradycastiro...@gmail.com wrote:
Before I go and flesh out the entire interfaces for the provided
types, does anyone have a use for it?
A real-world application of persistent
On Jun 14, 9:50 pm, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:14:10 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
So-called vacuous truth. It's often useful to have all([]) return
true, but it's not *always* useful -- there are reasonable cases
On Jun 15, 8:37 am, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
In article 79mtt7f1r480...@mid.uni-berlin.de,
Diez B. Roggisch de...@nospam.web.de wrote:
Aaron Brady wrote:
Some time ago, I recommended a pursuit of keeping 'persistent
composite' types on disk, to be read and updated at other times
On Jun 15, 11:10 am, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com writes:
A real-world application of persistent data structures can be found here:
http://stevekrenzel.com/persistent-list
Jaime, thanks for the link. I contacted its author.
You might
On Jun 14, 4:02 am, kindly kin...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sure people have thought of this before, but I cant find where.
I think that python should adapt a way of defining different types of
mapping functions by proceeding a letter before the curly brackets.
i.e ordered = o{}, multidict =
On Jun 14, 6:30 am, kindly kin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 14, 1:59 pm, Steven D'Aprano
snip
I am glad the ordered dict will be in 2.7 and 3.1. I
was just imagining what would be the next step in definition of
structures. New languages like clojure have adopted the dict as top
level. I
Hi, please forgive the multi-posting on this general topic.
Some time ago, I recommended a pursuit of keeping 'persistent
composite' types on disk, to be read and updated at other times by
other processes. Databases provide this functionality, with the
exception that field types in any given
On Jun 14, 8:24 am, Steven D'Aprano
st...@removethis.cybersource.com.au wrote:
Aaron Brady wrote:
Some time ago, I recommended a pursuit of keeping 'persistent
composite' types on disk, to be read and updated at other times by
other processes. Databases provide this functionality
On Jun 14, 10:02 am, Arnaud Delobelle arno...@googlemail.com wrote:
snip
guilt, it doesn't mean they will be convicted. There needs to be enough
evidence to convince the jury. So it would be something like:
if sum(guilt_weight(e) for e in evidence) GUILT_THRESHOLD:
the defendant is
On Jun 14, 12:37 pm, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com writes:
snip
type thingy. A car is a single car. Nothing is zero cars, which is
not a car, just like two cars is not a car.
That seems to confuse values with collections of them. A car is
On Jun 7, 6:13 pm, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com writes:
url+= { '/': '' }.get( url[ -1 ], '/' )
Shorter is always better.
url = url.rstrip('/') + '/'
I was joking. Sheesh.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jun 8, 9:50 am, Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com
wrote:
Aaron Brady wrote:
Shorter is always better.
url+= { '/': '' }.get( url[ -1 ], '/' )
Why bother with spaces or 3 letter-wide token, check this :o) :
x+={'/':''}.get(x[-1],'/')
Apart from joking, the following
On Jun 6, 8:07 am, tsangpo tsangpo.newsgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to ensure that the url ends with a '/', now I have to do thisa like
below.
url = url + '' if url[-1] == '/' else '/'
Is there a better way?
url+= { '/': '' }.get( url[ -1 ], '/' )
Shorter is always better.
--
On Jun 5, 5:50 am, kj no.em...@please.post wrote:
Hi. I need to implement, within a Python script, the same
functionality as that of Unix's
grep -rl some_string some_directory
I.e. find all the files under some_directory that contain the string
some_string.
snip
The 'mmap.mmap' class
I am writing a mapping object, and I want to ask about the details of
__hash__ and __eq__. IIUC if I understand correctly, the Python
dict's keys' hash codes are looked up first in O( 1 ), then all the
matching hash entries are compared on equality in O( n ). That is,
the hash code just really
On May 30, 12:11 pm, Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 11:20:47 -0700 (PDT), Aaron Brady
castiro...@gmail.com declaimed the following in
gmane.comp.python.general:
P.S. I always feel like my posts should start like, A mapping object
am writing I. Not too
On May 29, 8:21 am, Michele Petrazzo
michele.petra...@remove_me_unipex.it wrote:
Hi all,
I want to execute a python code inside a string and so I use the exec
statement. The strange thing is that the try/except couple don't catch
the exception and so it return to the main code.
Is there a
On May 29, 9:55 am, Michele Petrazzo
michele.petra...@remove_me_unipex.it wrote:
Aaron Brady wrote:
STR =
class Globals:
err = 0
def a_funct():
try:
1/0
except ZeroDivisionError:
import traceback
Globals.err = traceback.format_exc()
exec STR
On May 17, 7:05 am, jer...@martinfamily.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
From a user point of view I think that adding a 'par' construct to
Python for parallel loops would add a lot of power and simplicity,
e.g.
par i in list:
updatePartition(i)
There would be no locking and it would be the
On May 19, 11:20 pm, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au writes:
(4) the caller is responsible for making sure he never shares data while
looping over it.
I don't think I've missed any possibilities. You have to pick one of
On May 8, 7:52 pm, Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-
cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 04:27:15 -0700, Aaron Brady wrote:
Can be, but if there's reason enough to keep it with a class, there's
no reason not to.
That's a bit of hyperbole; the usual reasons such as code bloat
On May 7, 1:29 am, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 00:39:28 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
Functions that refer to neither the class nor an instance thereof can
usually be moved outside the class altogether. Python is not Java. I
believe
On May 6, 2:23 am, Arnaud Delobelle arno...@googlemail.com wrote:
On May 5, 10:20 pm, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
def auto( f ):
def _inner( *ar, **kw ):
return f( _inner, *ar, **kw )
return _inner
Quoting myself near the start of this thread:
Here's
On May 6, 6:49 am, Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
Luis Zarrabeitia wrote:
Btw, is there any way to inject a name into a function's namespace?
Following
the python tradition, maybe we should try to create a more general solution!
How about a mechanism to pass arguments that are
On May 6, 12:56 am, John O'Hagan resea...@johnohagan.com wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Sion Arrowsmith wrote:
John O'Hagan resea...@johnohagan.com wrote:
I can see that it's tantalizing, though, because _somebody_ must know
about the assignment; after all, we just executed it!
Except we
On May 5, 2:50 pm, Steve Howell showel...@yahoo.com wrote:
On May 4, 11:08 pm, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
I propose a small piece of sugar. When a function is entered, Python
creates an ordinary local name in the function's local namespace, and
binds the
On May 5, 2:17 pm, George Oliver georgeolive...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 5, 11:59 am, Dave Angel da...@ieee.org wrote:
1) forget about getattr() unless you have hundreds of methods in your
map. The real question is why you need two maps. What good is the
command string doing you? Why not
On May 5, 3:54 pm, bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Aaron Brady:
def auto( f ):
... def _inner( *ar, **kw ):
... return f( g, *ar, **kw )
... g= _inner
... return g
Looks nice, I'll try to the following variant to see if it's usable:
def thisfunc(fun
On May 1, 4:30 am, Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-
cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2009 16:30:19 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
I have never written anything so unbelievable in my life. And I hope I
never will.
I didn't say you did. If anyone thought I was quoting Lawrence's
On Apr 29, 1:01 pm, psaff...@googlemail.com
psaff...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm trying to get to grips with the multiprocessing module, having
only used ParallelPython before.
based on this example:
http://docs.python.org/library/multiprocessing.html#using-a-pool-of-w...
what happens if I
On Apr 30, 3:49 pm, Luis Zarrabeitia ky...@uh.cu wrote:
Hi. I'm building a script that closely follows a producer-consumer model. In
this case, the producer is disk-bound and the consumer is cpu-bound, so I'm
using the multiprocessing module (python2.5 with the multiprocessing backport
from
On May 1, 12:09 am, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm currently calling subprocess.call() on a batch file (in Windows)
that sets a few environment variables that are needed by further
processes started via subprocess.call(). How can I persist the
environment modifications by the
On Apr 28, 9:54 pm, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:59:18 -0700, Aaron Brady wrote:
To steal an idiom from Laura: Python has a float-shaped Nothing 0.0, a
list-shaped Nothing [], a dict-shaped Nothing {}, an int-shaped Nothing
0
Um, that's the limit of what I'm familiar with, I'm afraid. I'd have
to experiment.
On Apr 28, 10:44 am, Way csw...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks a lot for the reply. I am not familiar with multi-process in
Python. I am now using something like:
snip
However, in this case, Process5's stdout cannot
What is the rationale for considering all instances true of a user-
defined type? Is it strictly a practical stipulation, or is there
something conceptually true about objects?
'''
object.__bool__(self)
If a class defines neither __len__() nor __bool__(), all its instances
are considered true.
On Apr 28, 1:35 am, Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Brady wrote:
What is the rationale for considering all instances true of a user-
defined type?
User-defined objects (or type) can override .__len__() [usually
container types] or .__nonzero__() to make bool() returns False
On Apr 28, 2:39 am, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:11:11 -0700, Aaron Brady wrote:
What is the rationale for considering all instances true of a user-
defined type? Is it strictly a practical stipulation, or is there
something
On Apr 27, 10:59 pm, Way csw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello friends,
I have a little messy situation on IPC. Please if you can, give me
some suggestion on how to implement. Thanks a lot!
- denotes create
MainProcess - Process1 - Process3 (from os.system)
|
On Apr 28, 12:20 am, Gunter Henriksen gunterhenrik...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you don't want to use a 3rd party module you could
use the multiprocessing module
That is definitely good for when I have a tree of
processes which are all Python applications. I use
it for that. But I am looking
On Apr 24, 1:18 am, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 11:34 pm, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 11:52 am, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:09 am, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Aaron Brady
On Apr 26, 10:52 am, Scott David Daniels scott.dani...@acm.org
wrote:
Travis wrote:
... I've noticed that every one of you is wrong about programming.
Since I can't say it effectively, here's someone who can:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHosLhPEN3k
That's the answer.
That is a
On Apr 22, 11:34 pm, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 11:52 am, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:09 am, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think Python
On Apr 22, 12:09 am, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think Python should have a relation class in the standard library.
Fat chance.
Perhaps I'm not understanding relation correctly, but are you
On Apr 22, 11:52 am, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:09 am, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think Python should have a relation class in the standard library.
Fat chance
On Apr 20, 11:04 pm, per perfr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 20, 11:08 pm, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:39:35 -0700, per wrote:
hi all,
i am generating a list of random tuples of numbers between 0 and 1 using
the rand() function,
Hi all,
I think Python should have a relation class in the standard library.
Fat chance. I want to write a recipe for it, but I don't know how. I
want your advice on some of the trade-offs, what it should look like,
what the pitfalls are, different strengths and weaknesses, etc.
Fundamentally,
On Apr 21, 2:25 am, rahul rahul03...@gmail.com wrote:
i have a c extension
snip
dict=PyEval_GetLocals();
snip
PyMapping_SetItemString(dict,varname,newVar_pyvalue);
snip
than first two test cases runs correctly and gives result for var1
value changed but 3rd test case not
On Apr 19, 3:05 am, Hendrik van Rooyen m...@microcorp.co.za wrote:
Aaron Brady casti.@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 18, 4:44 am, Hendrik van Rooyen m...@microcorp.co.za wrote:
to untangle some spaghetti code. He did not mention if
the spaghetti was actually doing it's job, bug free, which
On Apr 18, 4:44 am, Hendrik van Rooyen m...@microcorp.co.za wrote:
baykus b..@gmail.com wrote:
I guess I did not articulate myself well enough. I was just looking
for a toy to play around. I never suggested that Python+Basic would be
better than Python and everyone should use it. Python
On Apr 18, 2:25 pm, KoolD sourya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
I need to convert a C code to python please help me figure out how to
do
it.
Suppose the C program's like:
typedef struct _str
{
int a;
char *b;
int c;}str;
int main()
{
str mbr;
On Apr 17, 9:41 pm, Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-
cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:22:49 -0700, Pavel Panchekha wrote:
I've got an object which has a method, __nonzero__ The problem is, that
method is attached to that object not that class
a = GeneralTypeOfObject()
On Apr 17, 1:47 am, roge...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am C++ guy for the most part and don't know much of Python, so,
please, bear with me if I am asking errrm..idiotic question.
Old rexec module provided kinda 'secure' execution environment. I am
not looking for security at this point. What I
On Apr 17, 3:33 am, Vito De Tullio zak.mc.kra...@libero.it wrote:
Mikael Olofsson wrote:
I don't think the guy in question finds it that funny.
I don't think the python in question finds it that funny.
--
By ZeD
Man bites python.
Python bites dog.
Dog bites man.
The end.
--
On Apr 17, 4:03 am, Clarendon jine...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thank you very much for this information. It seems to point me to the
right direction. However, I do not fully understand the flatten
function and its output. Some indices seem to be inaccurate. I tried
to find this function at
On Apr 17, 8:22 am, John Machin sjmac...@lexicon.net wrote:
On 17/04/2009 7:32 PM, Clarendon wrote:
Dear John Machin
I presume that you replied to me instead of the list accidentally.
So sorry about the typo. It should be: the program should *see* that
the designated *words* are...
On Apr 16, 8:02 am, Rüdiger Ranft _r...@web.de wrote:
Diez B. Roggisch schrieb:
Rüdiger Ranft schrieb:
Hi all,
I need to call some programms and catch their stdout and stderr streams.
While the Popen class from subprocess handles the call, I get the
results of the programm not until
On Apr 17, 11:19 am, roge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 17, 7:06 am, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
It depends what you mean by secure environment. One option is to
create a subprocess, to just limit access your variables. Another is
to compile and examine their code yourself
On Apr 17, 7:37 am, prueba...@latinmail.com wrote:
On Apr 16, 3:59 pm, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 16, 10:57 am, prueba...@latinmail.com wrote:
Another interesting task for those that are looking for some
interesting problem:
I inherited some rule system
On Apr 17, 12:15 pm, Paul McGuire pt...@austin.rr.com wrote:
On Apr 17, 10:43 am, John Machin sjmac...@lexicon.net wrote:
snip
not only does this handle
0.00 LE A LE 4.00, but it could also evaluate 0.00 LE A LE 4.00 LE
E D. (I see that I should actually do some short-circuiting here -
if
On Apr 17, 1:43 pm, J. Cliff Dyer j...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 13:33 +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
mousemeat mousem...@gmail.com writes:
Correct me if i am wrong, but i can pickle an object that contains a
bound method (it's own bound method).
No, you can't:
On Apr 17, 2:01 pm, Paul McGuire pt...@austin.rr.com wrote:
On Apr 17, 1:26 pm, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, not to offend; I don't know your background.
Courtesy on Usenet!!! I'm going to go buy a lottery ticket!
Not to worry, I'm a big boy. People have even called my
On Apr 17, 7:03 pm, AD. anton.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 17, 11:11 pm, Aaron Brady castiro...@gmail.com wrote:
Man bites python.
Python bites dog.
Dog bites man.
or just:
man,python bites python,man
No need for the temporary value in Python.
Is Python a mutable type?
Just don't
1 - 100 of 533 matches
Mail list logo
