On Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 11:45:23 PM UTC-7, Kaka wrote:
> for i in range(len(A.hp)):
>
> for j in range(len(run_parameters.bits_Mod)):
> req_slots[j] = math.ceil((A.T[i])
>
> for g in Temp[i]["Available_ranges"][j]:
> for s in range(g[0], g[-1]):
>
On Thursday, August 30, 2018 at 10:08:34 AM UTC-6, Νίκος Βέργος wrote:
> I did try it with 'None' and as page='index.html' Flask return an error both
> ways (while bottle framework does not)
I think you are mistaken, making the change I suggested
fixes the "TypeError: index() missing 1 required p
On Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 10:57:35 AM UTC-6, Νίκος Βέργος wrote:
> Flask app.py
> ==
> @app.route( '/' )
> @app.route( '/' )
> def index( page ):
>
> # use the variable form template for displaying
> counter = '''
>
> td> Αριθμός Επισκεπτών:
>
On 11/09/2017 10:51 AM, Rhodri James wrote:
> On 09/11/17 17:41, Michael Torrie wrote:
>> On 11/09/2017 09:33 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Rurpy via Python-list
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 11/08/2017 11:29 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On 11/09/2017 09:33 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Rurpy via Python-list
> wrote:
>> On 11/08/2017 11:29 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Please, Jon, accept that we were not deliberately trying
>>> to put you dow
On 11/08/2017 11:29 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> [...]
> Please, Jon, accept that we were not deliberately trying
> to put you down. Steve, if you can clearly state your position on this
> (possibly worded in the form of an apology?), it would go a long way
> to clearing this up.
> ChrisA
Are you t
On 11/08/2017 08:18 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Ned Batchelder writes:
> [...]
>> Second, now you want us to agree that calling someone arrogant isn't
>> an attack?
>
> It's one thing to say “this idea is arrogant”, which is what Steve did.
> That's not in any way personal, nor an attack on a person.
On 06/26/2017 09:42 AM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 01:16 am, Ben S. wrote:
>
>> print mm + "/" + dd + "/" + + " " + hour + ":" + mi + ":" + ss
>> ^
>> SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'
>>
>> Whats wrong?
>
> Did you read the error message?
>
> Missing
On 04/22/2017 05:17 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Friday, April 21, 2017 at 2:38:08 PM UTC+5:30, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 20-04-17 om 17:25 schreef Rustom Mody:
>>> But more importantly thank you for your polite and consistent pointing out
>>> to
>>> Ben Finney that his religion-bashing signature
On 04/20/2017 01:46 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>[...]
> I am not obliged to address every point of every post, and the absence
> of comment on any particular point is not generally to be read as full
> assent.
Certainly anyone is free to choose to ignore bigotry on the list,
because one agrees with it,
On 04/20/2017 09:25 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>[...]
> No one seems to have noticed who Rurpy is defending : Ranting Rick and Bart.
> Sheesh!
> A rhinocerous would have gossamer skin compared to these 'gentlemen'
> Sheesh² !
You are mistaken. I am not defending Rick or Bar
On 04/19/2017 08:27 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Rurpy via Python-list writes:
>
>> You and Chris refused to find any fault with the use of the two
>> stereotypes under discussion one of which was "unable-to-learn old
>> people".
>
> I expressed absolutely no
On 04/17/2017 03:39 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>[...]
I meant to respond to this earlier but forgot to. I'll respond
to the following part now since there seems to be some confusion
about my motives/intent.
> In my experience, the bar for banning participants is pretty high, and
> rightly so. Car
On 04/19/2017 01:56 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Rurpy via Python-list writes:
>
>> I don't think stupid black people or senile old people should be
>> allowable because those are not choosable *behaviors*. But is
>> unable-to-learn old people a choosable behavior?
On 04/18/2017 04:34 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Ben Finney
> wrote:
>> Chris Angelico writes:
>>
>>> The charge has been examined and dropped. Steven did not violate the
>>> CoC. Please stop talking as if he has. He *was accused of* violating
>>> it, and then fo
On 04/18/2017 04:34 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Ben Finney
> wrote:
>> Chris Angelico writes:
>>
>>> The charge has been examined and dropped. Steven did not violate the
>>> CoC. Please stop talking as if he has. He *was accused of* violating
>>> it, and then fou
On 04/18/2017 09:35 AM, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 03:28:32 +0000, Rurpy wrote:
>> On 04/17/2017 08:19 PM, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Your words remind me of this:
>>>
>>> "The seriousness of the charge
On 04/18/2017 09:29 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Rurpy via
> Python-list wrote:
>> On 04/18/2017 08:19 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Rurpy via
>>> Python-list wrote:
>>>> I have nothing p
On 04/18/2017 08:19 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Rurpy via
> Python-list wrote:
>> I have nothing personal against Steven. He called someone out
>> for being bigoted, then repeated the exact same offense himself.
>
> The charge has b
On 04/18/2017 07:16 AM, Mario R. Osorio wrote:
> Feels like this is something personal against Steven. You should
> probably take this to court. I'd rather read Steven's insightful
> answers and rants than you crying. None here is meant to sugar coat
> anything, and if that is what you are looking
On 04/17/2017 08:19 PM, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:23:34 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> Paul Rubin writes:
>>> Rurpy writes:
>>>> A couple weeks ago a frequent poster here (Steve D'Aprano
>>>> ) called another participant a
On 04/17/2017 04:38 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Rurpy via Python-list writes:
>
>> A couple weeks ago a frequent poster here (Steve D'Aprano
>> ) called another participant an "ugly
>> american" [*1].
>
> He gave no explicit reference, and so I can see w
A couple weeks ago a frequent poster here (Steve D'Aprano
) called another participant an "ugly american"
[*1]. This was followed just a couple weeks later with another post from Mr.
D'Aprano attacking a participant as "an old man" who can't understand new
technology, a blatant example of agei
On 04/13/2017 08:13 PM, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:56 pm, bart4...@gmail.com wrote:
> [...]
>> (** Although I find code full of class definitions, one-liners, decorators
>> and all the other esoterics, incomprehensive. I'm sure I'm not the only
>> one, so perhaps readability isn
On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 9:37:35 AM UTC-7, Wanderer wrote:
> On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 11:31:13 AM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Wanderer wrote:
> > > I mostly just lurk and view the post titles to see if something
> > > interesting is being discussed. T
On 03/14/2016 05:19 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 14/03/2016 22:40, BartC wrote:
> > [...a polite and reasonable comment...]
>
> Drivel. Any establised member of this community, or any other
> community for that matter, will always publish, unless, like the RUE,
> they've got something to hide. S
On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 8:12:22 AM UTC-7, Seymore4Head wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Nov 2015 11:54:20 +1100, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
> >On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 10:02 am, Seymore4Head wrote:
> >> So far the only use I have for regex is to replace slicing, but I
> >> think it is an improvement.
> >
> >
On 11/05/2015 01:18 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 05.11.15 um 06:59 schrieb rurpy:
>>> Can you call yourself a well-rounded programmer without at least
>>> a basic understanding of some regex library? Well, probably not.
>>> But that's part of the probl
On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 7:46:24 PM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:24 AM, rurpy wrote:
> The "take away" that I recommend is: Rurpy loves to argue in favour of
> regular expressions,
No, I don't love it, I quite dislike it.
> but as
On 11/04/2015 07:24 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:24 am, wrote:
>
>> You will find they are an indispensable tool, not just in Python
>> programming but in many aspects of computer use.
>
> You will find them a useful tool, but not indispensable by any means.
>
> Hint:
>
> - Ho
On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 7:31:34 PM UTC-7, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:13 am, rurpy wrote:
>
> > There would be far fewer computer languages, and they would be much
> > more primitive if regular expressions (and the fundamental concepts
> &g
On 11/04/2015 05:33 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:13 AM, rurpy--- via Python-list
> wrote:
>> On 11/04/2015 07:52 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:38 AM, rurpy wrote:
>>>> I'm afraid you are making a category
On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 4:05:06 PM UTC-7, Seymore4Head wrote:
>[...]
> I am still here, but I have to admit I am not picking up too much.
The "take away" I recommend is: the folks here are often way
overly negative regarding regular expressions and that you not
ignore them, but take the
On 11/04/2015 07:52 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:38 AM, rurpy wrote:
>> I'm afraid you are making a category error but perhaps that's in
>> part because I wasn't clear. I was not talking about computer
>> science. I was talking about h
On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 1:52:31 AM UTC-7, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 November 2015 18:21, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
>
> > What rurpy meant, was that regexes can surface to a computer user
> > earlier than variables and branches; a user who does no
On 11/03/2015 08:48 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 November 2015 11:33, rurpy wrote:
>
>>> Not quite. Core language concepts like ifs, loops, functions,
>>> variables, slicing, etc are the socket wrenches of the programmer's
>>> toolbox.
I should have checked the web site before posting, it
appears that both libpst and libpff only read pst files,
no write. Sorry for the noise.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/03/2015 12:09 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> Does anyone know of a module that allows the wiring of Outlook PST
> files using Python? I'm working on a project that will require me to
> migrate 60gb of maildir mail (multiple accounts) to Outlook.
I used libpst (http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libp
On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 9:38:24 PM UTC-7, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 09:23 PM, rurpy--- via Python-list wrote:
> >> My completely unsolicited advice is that regular expressions shouldn't be
> >> very high on the list of things to learn. They are very us
On 11/03/2015 12:15 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 03:23 pm, rurpy wrote:
>
>> Regular expressions should be learned by every programmer or by anyone
>> who wants to use computers as a tool. They are a fundamental part of
>> computer science and are
On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 8:58:45 PM UTC-7, Joel Goldstick wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Seymore4Head
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 20:42:37 -0600, Tim Chase
> > wrote:
> >
> > >On 2015-11-02 20:09, Seymore4Head wrote:
> > >> How do I make a regular expression that returns t
On 11/02/2015 08:51 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
>[...]
> Indeed, sometimes Jamie Zawinski's is often quite appropriate:
>
> Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use
> regular expressions." Now they have two problems.
Or its sometimes heard paraphrase:
Some people,
On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 2:48:58 PM UTC-7, Laura Creighton wrote:
> Actually, adding the XP - do not look here --
> message for several webpages has been on the pydotorg
> todo list for more than a week now.
>
> Not sure why it hasn't happened.
>
> Thank you for the reminder.
You're welcom
On 11/01/2015 09:43 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, rurpy--- via Python-list
> wrote:
>> I dont recall seeing anyone posting asking why they could not get
>> Python to install on Windows 95 recently. I only read this group
>> intermittent
On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 8:52:55 AM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:43 AM, rurpy--- via Python-list
> wrote:
> > Why, oh why, do the python.org front page and other pages that offer
> > a Windows download not say a word about it not run
On 11/01/2015 03:06 AM, Chris Warrick wrote:
> On 1 November 2015 at 09:23, t_ciorba--- via Python-list
> wrote:
>>
>> hi, i am not sure what is wrong, but after launching the installer
>> for windows XPsp3 python-3.5.0.exe i couldnt see what i have to
>> select, it was a white board and the onl
On Monday, September 14, 2015 at 5:23:32 PM UTC-6, Laura Creighton wrote:
>[...]
> I don't know about the others, but I am finding this rather more
> entertaining than another round of 'python -- does it have pointers'
> in python-list.
Could we please dispense with the gratuitous "what I'm intere
On 09/13/2015 06:50 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 04:45 am, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On 09/12/2015 10:32 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 02:42 pm, Random832 wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Computer science and IT is *dominated* by a single usage for "pointer" --
>>> it's
On Sunday, September 13, 2015 at 2:49:13 PM UTC-6, Ben Finney wrote:
> Chris Angelico writes:
>
> > I think Ben's referring to taunting jmf, whom Mark called the "RUE" or
> > "Resident Unicode Expert". There has been a long-standing antagonism
> > between those two (which is completely understand
On 09/12/2015 08:42 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Michael Torrie writes:
>> On 09/12/2015 08:22 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>> You appear to have the same level of knowledge of Python internals as
>>> the RUE has of the Python 3.3+ FSR unicode implementation. Let's have
>>> some fun, is Python pass by
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 6:25:39 PM UTC-6, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 09/12/2015 05:39 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> [...]
> > which may be summarized as:
> > 1. Steven (quoting Online dictionary): Pointer = Address
> > 2. Steven: "Python has pointers" is ridiculous
> > 3. Python docs: id ret
On 09/12/2015 06:02 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 7:15:18 PM UTC-4, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> [...]
> But in C, pointers mean more than that. You can perform arithmetic on
> them, to access memory as a linearly addressed abstraction. Python has
> nothing like this.
>
On 09/12/2015 05:39 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Sunday, September 13, 2015 at 4:05:21 AM UTC+5:30, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On 09/12/2015 04:14 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
>>> On 9/12/2015 12:58 PM, rurpy--- via Python-list wrote:
>>>
>>>> The ques
On 09/12/2015 05:14 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 23:34, rurpy--- via Python-list wrote:
>> On 09/12/2015 04:14 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
>>> On 9/12/2015 12:58 PM, rurpy--- via Python-list wrote:
>>>
>>>> The question is whether what "p
On 09/12/2015 04:14 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 9/12/2015 12:58 PM, rurpy--- via Python-list wrote:
>
>> The question is whether what "pointer" means in languages that use the
>> word is*so* different than its meaning in the Python sense
>
> I can'
On 09/12/2015 11:48 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 02:17 am, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
> [...]
>> the model of Python I eventually
>> developed is very much (I think, haven't read the whole thread) like
>> Random832's. I think of boxes (objects) with slots containing "pointers"
>>
On 09/12/2015 10:32 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 02:42 pm, Random832 wrote:
>[...]
> Computer science and IT is *dominated* by a single usage for "pointer" --
> it's an abstract memory address. The fundamental characteristics of
> pointers are:
Just upthread, you claimed someth
Picking a post to respond to, more or less at random...
On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 9:14:00 AM UTC-6, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 8:11:49 PM UTC+5:30, Laura Creighton wrote:
> > In a message of Sat, 12 Sep 2015 05:46:35 -0700, Rustom Mody writes:
> > >How about l
On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 6:18:39 AM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 05:18 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
> >> In a message of Thu, 10 Sep 2015 05:00:22 +1000, Chris Angelico writes:
> >>>To get started, you need s
On 08/17/2015 01:52 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Sun, 16 Aug 2015 22:05:29 -0700, rurpy--- via Python-list
> writes:
>> So I eventually found the kivy docs on their website where they
>> list prerequisite packages for installing kivy on ubuntu. I'll
On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 10:14:29 PM UTC-6, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Sun, 16 Aug 2015 20:19:49 -0700, rurpy--- via Python-list
> writes:
> >On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 8:00:14 PM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>[...]
> >> use pip (maybe in
On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 8:00:14 PM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:16 AM, shiva upreti
> wrote:
> > I am new to linux. I tried various things in attempt to install kivy. I
> > installed python 2.7.10 (I think python3 was already installed in ubuntu
> > 14.04). The
iting your
application but that are hard to port to Sqlite. So your
app is broken until you do all that work.
>> It is bad advise to recommend using Postgresql without
>> regard to the developer's actual needs.
>
> Naturally. But I must say postgres isn't the bad c
On 02/19/2015 01:47 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:26 AM, wrote:
>> I'll point out that five people in this thread (by my
>> count) have said that Postgresql requires a significant
>> amount of work to setup and use. Only you and Steven claim
>> the opposite. (And it soun
On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 at 10:39:04 PM UTC-7, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 02/18/2015 09:26 PM, memilanuk wrote:
> > On 02/18/2015 09:16 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> >> memilanuk writes:
> >>
> >>> In the past I've been waffling back and forth between a desktop
> >>> client/server setup, or a web-b
On 02/19/2015 12:23 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> Very possibly. With modern dependency management, it isn't hard to install
>> Postgresql:
>>
>> sudo aptitude postgresql
>>
>> or equivalent should work. For primitive operating systems wi
On 02/19/2015 12:07 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On 02/18/2015 07:13 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> Chris Angelico wrote:
> SQLite misses some important features that makes it better suited as a
> simple datastore, not much unlike shelve. And network use is not one
On 02/19/2015 09:03 AM, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2015-02-19 15:04, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 19/02/2015 14:17, Tim Chase wrote:
> Parameterized queries is just a pet peeve of mine that I wish to
> include here. SQLite misses it and I miss the fact SQLite misses
> it. The less SQL one need
On 02/18/2015 09:09 PM, Ben Finney wrote
> memilanuk writes:
>[...]
> If you want networked access, you need concurrent access and access
> permissions, etc.
Sqlite has concurrent access. It doesn't have concurrent
access that will support a large number of writers or high
volume of writes.
A
On 02/18/2015 07:13 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:> Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> SQLite misses some important features that makes it better suited as a
>>> simple datastore, not much unlike shelve. And network use is not one
>>> of them, since you can actually implement concurrent sqlite access by
>>> cod
On 02/18/2015 04:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On 02/18/2015 01:14 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>>> Johannes Bauer writes:
On 18.02.2015 08:05, Chris Angelico wrote:
> But if you need more facilities than SQLite3 can offer, maybe it's
> time to move up to a f
On 02/18/2015 05:08 PM, Mario Figueiredo wrote:
>[...]
> SQLite misses some important features that makes it better suited as a
> simple datastore, not much unlike shelve. And network use is not one
> of them, since you can actually implement concurrent sqlite access by
> coding an intermediate lay
On 02/18/2015 04:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Johannes Bauer wrote:
>> On 18.02.2015 08:05, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>>> But if you need more facilities than SQLite3 can offer, maybe it's
>>> time to move up to a full database server, instead of local files.
>>>
On 02/18/2015 01:14 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Johannes Bauer writes:
>> On 18.02.2015 08:05, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>>> But if you need more facilities than SQLite3 can offer, maybe it's
>>> time to move up to a full database server, instead of local files.
>>> Switching to PostgreSQL will give yo
On 06/05/2014 05:02 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>[...]
> But Linux Unicode support is much better than Windows. Unicode support in
> Windows is crippled by continued reliance on legacy code pages, and by
> the assumption deep inside the Windows APIs that Unicode means "16 bit
> characters". See,
On 02/25/2014 07:52 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 02/23/2014 08:01 PM, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On 02/23/2014 08:21 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>> On 24/02/2014 02:55, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 5:39 PM, alex23 wrote:
> On 24/02/2014 11:09 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>
On 02/23/2014 08:21 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 24/02/2014 02:55, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 5:39 PM, alex23 wrote:
>>> On 24/02/2014 11:09 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 24/02/2014 00:55, alex23 wrote:
> for _ in range(5):
> func()
the obvious i
still ignoring the primary thrust
> of my posts.
I wasn't sure what your "primary thrust" was, I asked you
to remind me and you failed to respond.
If you're referring to,
"Why, rurpy, do you continue to support, apologize for,
and argue in favour of, a piece of soft
On 12/25/2013 09:11 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On 12/24/13 8:44 PM, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On 12/23/2013 04:48 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
>>> On 12/22/13 11:52 PM, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
>[...]
>>> But it's a lot of work.
>> No, it not a "lot" of work (IMO and I use GG for every
>[...]
> Yes, th
On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 3:56:26 AM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:37 PM, wrote:
> > I have addressed this several times already. All
> > software is buggy. I even posted long list on the
> > problems I've had with Thunderbird. Choosing any
> > software is mak
On 12/25/2013 09:17 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>[...]
> Or maybe I should have just filtered everything from Google Groups
> into the bit bucket, because responding just creates threads like
> this. Do you honestly think that would be better? No response at all
> if the post comes from GG?
Do you r
On 12/24/2013 05:33 PM, Igor Korot wrote:
> Hi, ALL,
> I am working on a script that parses CSV file and after successful
> parsing insert data ino mySQL table.
> One of the fields in CSV holds a date+time value.
>
> What the script should do is check if the cell has any data, i.e. not
> empty an
that
Chris claimed (and you found reasonable to believe) that GG
corrupts white space in posts. I have not seen any such
effect, Chris' explanations were all handwaving, and so
pending something more convincing I will offer the alternate
explanation that it is just more unjustified dispa
p them.
>
>>
>> If you want to recommend the mailing list, fine, but please
>> don't make stupid, unfounded, accusatory suggestions.
>
> Rurpy: you're coming on really strong here. "Stupid"? No.
'Stupid" might not have been the most acc
On 12/23/2013 09:12 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 5:09 PM, wrote:
>> On Sunday, December 22, 2013 10:37:35 PM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> Actually, formatting errors ARE often caused by Google Groups. Maybe
>>> it wasn't in this instance, but I have seen several cases o
trashing whitespace
to a degree greater than other mail/usenet software
does.)
If you don't know what was entered into the posting
interface how can you say with such certainty that
what was received was different?
> Why, rurpy, do you continue to support, apologize for, and argue
On Sunday, December 22, 2013 10:37:35 PM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Actually, formatting errors ARE often caused by Google Groups. Maybe
> it wasn't in this instance, but I have seen several cases of GG
> mangling code formatting, so this was a perfectly reasonable theory.
What sort of formatt
On Sunday, December 22, 2013 10:37:35 PM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Actually, formatting errors ARE often caused by Google Groups. Maybe
> it wasn't in this instance, but I have seen several cases of GG
> mangling code formatting, so this was a perfectly reasonable theory.
And you have determi
On 12/22/2013 08:33 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Kevin Peterson wrote:
>> I am trying to control Aeroplane mode on Android using Python code.
>> I am running QPyPlus python. When I execute this code(that is
>> widespread in the net),
>>
>>#!/usr/bin/python
>>
On 12/20/2013 08:16 AM, dec...@msn.com wrote:
> y = raw_input('Enter a number:')
> print type y
> y = float(raw_input('Enter a number:'))
> print type y
>
> I'm assuming that y is an object.
Rather than thinking that y "is" an object, it is more accurate
to think of it as: y is a name that is "bo
On 12/14/2013 05:25 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Jai wrote:
>> GUI:-want to learn GUI programming in python , how should i proceed.
>>
>> There are lots of book here so I am confuse which book i should refer so
>> that i don't waste time . please answer
>
> Th
On 12/10/2013 10:36 AM, David Robinow wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:59 AM, wrote:
>> On 12/10/2013 09:22 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> ...
>> Mark is one of the resident trolls here. Among his other traits
>> is his delusion that he is Lord High Commander of this list.
>> Like with other trol
On 12/10/2013 09:22 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 10/12/2013 15:48, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
> [...]
> There is no "you might want to" about it. There are two options here,
> either read and action the page so we don't see double spaced crap
> amongst other things, use another tool, or don't post.
On 12/10/2013 06:47 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:35 AM, wrote:
> Also: You appear to be using Google Groups, which is the Mos Eisley of
> the newsgroup posting universe. You'll do far better to instead use
> some other means of posting, such as the mailing list:
Using
On 12/08/2013 10:20 PM, rusi wrote:
> On Monday, December 9, 2013 10:37:38 AM UTC+5:30, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
>[...]
>> However it does not change the fact that people here have responded
>> in rather extreme way to GG posts including calling GG users "twits"
>> and claiming GG posts damage their
On 12/09/2013 01:15 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:10 PM, wrote:
>> We all use buggy software every day. *Every* piece of non-trival
>> software is buggy -- you already know that. So you are saying
>> that bugs that annoy *you* are ones that *others* should change
>> their
On 12/09/2013 12:57 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:07 PM, wrote:
>> However it does not change the fact that people here have responded
>> in rather extreme way to GG posts including calling GG users "twits"
>> and claiming GG posts damage their eyesight, as well as repeated
On 12/08/2013 09:46 PM, rusi wrote:
> On Monday, December 9, 2013 9:46:30 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:58:09 -0800, rusi wrote:
>[...]
>> Does GG not give you some way of inspecting the post's full headers?
>
> Well I spent half hour looking around -- both inside G
e that's buggy, too. Of course, I'll first try to
> do things quietly (bug reports to the maintainers), but ultimately,
> the solution to buggy software is to NOT USE IT. If Google doesn't
> care enough about Groups to bring it up to the standard, then their
> penalty has to b
On 12/08/2013 05:27 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 00:08, ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On 12/08/2013 12:17 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:06 AM, wrote:>[...]
>[...]
> To the OP, please ignore the above, it's sheer, unadulterated rubbish.
> Nobody has ever been bull
1 - 100 of 500 matches
Mail list logo
