On 02/06/2012 06:16, Ethan Furman wrote:
Tim Chase wrote:
On 06/01/12 19:05, Jon Clements wrote:
On 01/06/12 23:13, Tim Chase wrote:
dbf.scatter_fields
*always* trump and refer to the method.
I did think about *trumping* one way or the other, but both *ugh*.
For the record, it
On 06/02/12 00:16, Ethan Furman wrote:
Tim Chase wrote:
On 06/01/12 19:05, Jon Clements wrote:
On 01/06/12 23:13, Tim Chase wrote:
dbf.scatter_fields
*always* trump and refer to the method.
I did think about *trumping* one way or the other, but both *ugh*.
For the record, it sounded
I'm getting towards an actual non-beta release, which means even more
tests, polishings, cleaning up of various things, and actual
documentation. :)
However, I am wondering about my current record API:
Currently, one does things like:
record.scatter_fields()
or
record.has_been_deleted
On 01/06/2012 18:50, Ethan Furman wrote:
I'm getting towards an actual non-beta release, which means even more
tests, polishings, cleaning up of various things, and actual
documentation. :)
However, I am wondering about my current record API:
Currently, one does things like:
MRAB wrote:
On 01/06/2012 18:50, Ethan Furman wrote:
I'm getting towards an actual non-beta release, which means even more
tests, polishings, cleaning up of various things, and actual
documentation. :)
However, I am wondering about my current record API:
Currently, one does things like:
On 06/01/12 15:05, Ethan Furman wrote:
MRAB wrote:
I'd probably think of a record as being more like a dict (or an
OrderedDict)
with the fields accessed by key:
record[name]
but:
record.deleted
Record fields are accessible both by key and by attribute -- by key
primarily
On 01/06/12 23:13, Tim Chase wrote:
On 06/01/12 15:05, Ethan Furman wrote:
MRAB wrote:
I'd probably think of a record as being more like a dict (or an
OrderedDict)
with the fields accessed by key:
record[name]
but:
record.deleted
Record fields are accessible both by key and by
On 06/01/12 19:05, Jon Clements wrote:
On 01/06/12 23:13, Tim Chase wrote:
dbf.scatter_fields
*always* trump and refer to the method.
I did think about *trumping* one way or the other, but both *ugh*.
For the record, it sounded like the OP wanted to be able to use the
dot-notation for
Tim Chase wrote:
On 06/01/12 19:05, Jon Clements wrote:
On 01/06/12 23:13, Tim Chase wrote:
dbf.scatter_fields
*always* trump and refer to the method.
I did think about *trumping* one way or the other, but both *ugh*.
For the record, it sounded like the OP wanted to be able to use the
