Steve Holden
sigh It was an April Fool's joke. It's not actually true.
To try and ensure this thread dies for ever, I have added a note to the
blog entry at
http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
noting the fact that this was indeed an April Fool's joke.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To try and ensure this thread dies for ever, I have added a note to the
blog entry at
http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
noting the fact that this was indeed an April Fool's joke.
That's
Robert Kern wrote:
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Shane Hathaway writes:
I must saay that i am fully in favor of this change. The ppython
developerrs need to eat too. Iis no one ellse aware off the perils oof
ooutright open source llicenssing?
I disagree with the change. I think Steve Holden is
Shane Hathaway writes:
I must saay that i am fully in favor of this change. The ppython
developerrs need to eat too. Iis no one ellse aware off the perils oof
ooutright open source llicenssing?
I disagree with the change. I think Steve Holden is right.
1- How do you enforce this?
2-
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Shane Hathaway writes:
I must saay that i am fully in favor of this change. The ppython
developerrs need to eat too. Iis no one ellse aware off the perils oof
ooutright open source llicenssing?
I disagree with the change. I think Steve Holden is right.
1- How do
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
I would like to place on record my
That was nasty Steve - at least I'm ready for any kind of bad new today ;-)
Regards,
Philippe
Steve Holden wrote:
As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described
in
Philippe Martin wrote:
That was nasty Steve - at least I'm ready for any kind of bad new today ;-)
Sorry ;-)
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd www.holdenweb.com
Love me, love my blog holdenweb.blogspot.com
--
I say good riddence. Python's success has always been on its merits as
an open source application platform. Corprate usage has always been
relatively insignificant, and I suspect that many companies are
overrepresenting the level of dependance they have on python in an
attempt to steer their
Steve Holden wrote:
As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
I would like to place on record my protest against
Steve Holden wrote:
As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
I must saay that i am fully in favor of this
Steve Holden wrote:
As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
I would like to place on record my protest against
Fuzzyman wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
I would like to place on
Steve
I agree with you. If my vote means anything, I vote against it.
The Board realises that this change will be
contentious. There are many advantages
to making it, however, which we feel will
benefit the Python community at large
and the PSF membership in particular.
Users who wish to
WAIT-
Did I just get caught by an April Fools Joke?
I have a nasty feeling about this :))
C
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fuzzyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (F) wrote:
F Can I ask for clarification. The charge applies to any commercial use
F of a derivative work based on the Python source code ?
F Normal applications that use Python, including bunding the standard
F CPython as an executable, using tools like py2exe, won't
I would certainly look at *all details* of the announcement, including
the second line from the top which gives the date:-)
Ivan
Caleb Hattingh wrote:
WAIT-
Did I just get caught by an April Fools Joke?
I have a nasty feeling about this :))
C
--
Ivan HermanI would certainly look at *all details* of the
announcement,
Aww, but I liked the idea of copying Perl 6 REs, and porting python to
the toy CPU :-)
(But making strings mutable sounds too much strange).
Bye and thank you,
bearophile
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aww, but I liked the idea of copying Perl 6 REs, and porting python to
the toy CPU :-)
I think if PSF is going to support porting of Python to toy CPUs then
the Digi-Comp should be the first target. This will breathe new life
into these toys which for years have been
Look at the date.
Worry about this if it is still around tomarrow
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2006-04-01, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
Good one Steve.
I
On 2006-04-01, Piet van Oostrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fuzzyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (F) wrote:
F Can I ask for clarification. The charge applies to any commercial use
F of a derivative work based on the Python source code ?
F Normal applications that use Python, including bunding the standard
F
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
That isn't in the published 2.5 License.
http://docs.python.org/dev/ref/node110.html
Thanks for the scare..
~r
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fuzzyman wrote:
cut
From the site:
Advanced Program for Research In Licensing, whose First Object-Oriented
License
string = Advanced Program for Research In Licensing, whose First
Object-Oriented License
for letter in string:
if ord(letter) in range(65,91):
print(letter),
--
Hmmm... after due consideration (and reading the announcmement
properly), I support this license change in full.
If I could read past the first paragraph do you think I would really
hang onto this newsgroup asking stupid questions?!
The personal harm caused readers of this announcement
Is this an April fool's joke?
Please post a link to the original article. Not just a post to a blog.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2006-04-01, walterbyrd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this an April fool's joke?
Did you read the blog entry?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I will invent TIDY
at BOWL...
visi.com
Grant Edwards a écrit :
On 2006-04-01, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-04-01, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-04-01, walterbyrd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this an April fool's joke?
Did you read the blog entry?
I suspect he didn't. I'm guessing that eventually we'll have to remove
the blog entry just so's nobobdy's tempted to take it seriously.
regards
Steve
Steve Holden wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-04-01, walterbyrd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this an April fool's joke?
Did you read the blog entry?
I suspect he didn't. I'm guessing that eventually we'll have to remove
the blog entry just so's nobobdy's tempted to take it
walterbyrd wrote:
Please post a link to the original article. Not just a post to a blog.
the pyfound blog is the official PSF blog; it's linked from the PSF:s
homepage:
http://www.python.org/psf/
/F
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
I would like to place on record my protest against this change. I think
it
34 matches
Mail list logo
