Am Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:32:13 -0500
schrieb Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com:
On 07/05/2010 02:50 AM, Gregor Horvath wrote:
Am Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:51:54 -0500
schrieb Tim Chasepython.l...@tim.thechases.com:
I think it's the same venting of frustration that caused veteran
VB6
On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 18:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
CM cmpyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Any online group is an opportunity to register dissent in a way that
is public, open, immediate, interactive, and will (probably) be
preserved for historians to check. The fact is, some people have
gripes with Python 3;
Am Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:51:54 -0500
schrieb Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com:
I think it's the same venting of frustration that caused veteran
VB6 developers to start calling VB.Net Visual Fred -- the
language was too different and too non-backwards-compatible.
VB6 - VB.NET and
In article mailman.247.1278309447.1673.python-l...@python.org,
Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 20:05:03 -0400, Roy Smith r...@panix.com declaimed
the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
In article mailman.238.1278287528.1673.python-l...@python.org,
On 7/4/2010 9:20 PM, CM wrote:
On Jul 4, 7:14 pm, Terry Reedytjre...@udel.edu wrote:
I think there's a good point to Python 3 put-downs (if I take put-down
to mean generally reasonable criticism, which is what I've read here
recently, and not trolling). And that is simply to register
On 07/05/2010 02:50 AM, Gregor Horvath wrote:
Am Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:51:54 -0500
schrieb Tim Chasepython.l...@tim.thechases.com:
I think it's the same venting of frustration that caused veteran
VB6 developers to start calling VB.Net Visual Fred -- the
language was too different and too
On Jul 5, 2:33 pm, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 7/4/2010 9:20 PM, CM wrote:
On Jul 4, 7:14 pm, Terry Reedytjre...@udel.edu wrote:
I think there's a good point to Python 3 put-downs (if I take put-down
to mean generally reasonable criticism, which is what I've read here
On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:32:13 -0500, Tim Chase wrote:
On 07/05/2010 02:50 AM, Gregor Horvath wrote:
Am Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:51:54 -0500
schrieb Tim Chasepython.l...@tim.thechases.com:
I think it's the same venting of frustration that caused veteran VB6
developers to start calling VB.Net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I think it's the same venting of frustration that caused veteran
VB6 developers to start calling VB.Net Visual Fred -- the
language was too different and too non-backwards-compatible.
The 2to3 tools are better (partly due to the less drastic
language changes compared to the Fred'ification of
In article mailman.238.1278287528.1673.python-l...@python.org,
Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
I've often wondered if changing the name of the language (such as
Adder, Served, Dwarf or Fawlty for the Britcom fans in
the crowd) would have mitigated some of the more
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
In article mailman.238.1278287528.1673.python-l...@python.org,
Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
I've often wondered if changing the name of the language (such as
Adder, Served, Dwarf or Fawlty for the Britcom fans
Roy Smith r...@panix.com writes:
Maybe it should have been Python five, no, THREE!
+1 QOTW
--
\ “Our products just aren't engineered for security.” —Brian |
`\ Valentine, senior vice-president of Microsoft Windows |
_o__)
On Jul 4, 7:14 pm, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
I think there's a good point to Python 3 put-downs (if I take put-down
to mean generally reasonable criticism, which is what I've read here
recently, and not trolling). And that is simply to register
dissent.
Any online group is an
14 matches
Mail list logo
