I have just started using 2.6 (upgrade from 2.5). All my web
applications' code (using Django), work without any changes.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:25:47 -0700, Kee Nethery wrote:
I would prefer to be in 3.x because all the inconsistencies of how you
do things in 2.x make it harder than it needs to be to learn the
language.
People who have been coding in 2.x for along time don't notice how the
syntax is wonky in
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
Kee Nethery wrote:
I am in 2.x because the IDE I am using does not support stepping through
my code when in 3.x. As soon as the IDE I use supports debugging in 3.x, I'm
moving up to 3.x.
I would prefer to be in 3.x
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0500 Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle na...@animats.com
wrote:
What are the differences between 2.5 and 2.6?
http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.6.html
/W
--
INVALID? DE!
--
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Andreas Waldenburger
use...@geekmail.invalid wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0500 Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle na...@animats.com
wrote:
What are the differences between 2.5 and 2.6?
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:04:25 -0500 Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Andreas Waldenburger
use...@geekmail.invalid wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0500 Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle na...@animats.com
Hi,
I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
versions. But the code developed in newer versions might be better
supported in the
Peng Yu wrote:
Hi,
I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
versions. But the code developed in newer versions might be better
On Sep 12, 3:47 pm, Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
versions. But the code
On Sep 12, 4:10 pm, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
Peng Yu wrote:
Hi,
I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
Peng Yu wrote:
On Sep 12, 4:10 pm, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
Peng Yu wrote:
Hi,
I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
I am in 2.x because the IDE I am using does not support stepping
through my code when in 3.x. As soon as the IDE I use supports
debugging in 3.x, I'm moving up to 3.x.
I would prefer to be in 3.x because all the inconsistencies of how you
do things in 2.x make it harder than it needs to be
Kee Nethery wrote:
I am in 2.x because the IDE I am using does not support stepping through
my code when in 3.x. As soon as the IDE I use supports debugging in 3.x,
I'm moving up to 3.x.
I would prefer to be in 3.x because all the inconsistencies of how you
do things in 2.x make it harder
13 matches
Mail list logo
