On 9 Dez., 11:51, Helmut Jarausch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I was somewhat surprised when I ran pystones with python-2.5.2 and
with python-3.0
On my old/slow machine I get
python-2.5.2
from test import pystone
pystone.pystones()
gives (2.73, 18315.018315018315)
python-3.0
from
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
I know that processing unicode is inherently slower,
but still I was surprised that it's so much slower.
Is there any hope Python-3.0 will get faster or
is the main potential for optimizations exhausted, already?
That's not to start a flame war!
I know computers get
Hi,
I was somewhat surprised when I ran pystones with python-2.5.2 and
with python-3.0
On my old/slow machine I get
python-2.5.2
from test import pystone
pystone.pystones()
gives (2.73, 18315.018315018315)
python-3.0
from test import pystone
pystone.pystones()
gives (4.2705,