Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message mailman.3438.1239062418.11746.python-l...@python.org, Delaney,
Timothy (Tim) wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message mailman.3332.1238914117.11746.python-l...@python.org,
Terry Reedy wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
All Python objects are
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message mailman.3332.1238914117.11746.python-l...@python.org,
Terry Reedy wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
All Python objects are reference-counted.
Nope. Only in CPython, and even that could change.
Why should it?
Because Guido has said it might
In message mailman.3438.1239062418.11746.python-l...@python.org, Delaney,
Timothy (Tim) wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message mailman.3332.1238914117.11746.python-l...@python.org,
Terry Reedy wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
All Python objects are reference-counted.
Nope.
On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:51:31 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
All Python objects are reference-counted. Once the file object becomes
inaccessible, it is automatically closed. Simple.
If only it were so simple.
Firstly, what you describe is an implementation detail of CPython, not
Python the
:
with open('com1', 'r') as f:
for line in f:
print('line')
Why bother, why not just
for line in open('com1', 'r') :
print line
So its does the same thing as with right ?
Why do you need a with?
Automatic closing and finalizing stuff.
All Python objects are reference-counted.
Nope
In message 01e842d6$0$20654$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
Firstly, what you describe is an implementation detail of CPython, not
Python the language. Jython does not close files as soon as they become
inaccessible, and IronPython and CLPython may not.
That's a limitation
On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 18:52:58 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message 01e842d6$0$20654$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
Firstly, what you describe is an implementation detail of CPython, not
Python the language. Jython does not close files as soon as they become
On Apr 5, 12:24 am, Gabriel Genellina gagsl-...@yahoo.com.ar
wrote:
En Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:11:12 -0300, gert gert.cuyk...@gmail.com escribió:
On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, Kushal Kumaran kushal.kuma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:10:36 +0200
Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
In message mailman.3332.1238914117.11746.python-l...@python.org, Terry
Reedy wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
All Python objects are reference-counted.
Nope. Only in CPython, and even that could change.
Why should it?
Once the file object becomes
inaccessible, it is automatically
On Apr 4, 12:58 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message 8bc55c05-19da-41c4-
b916-48e0a4be4...@p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, gert wrote:
with open('com1', 'r') as f:
for line in f:
print('line')
Why bother, why not just
On Apr 3, 10:10 pm, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
gert wrote:
I do understand, and I went looking into pySerial, but it is a long
way from getting compatible with python3.x and involves other libs
that are big and non pyhton3.x compatible.
So don't use Python 3.0. Most people
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:10:36 +0200
Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
gert wrote:
I do understand, and I went looking into pySerial, but it is a long
way from getting compatible with python3.x and involves other libs
that are big and non pyhton3.x compatible.
So don't use Python
On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, Kushal Kumaran kushal.kuma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:10:36 +0200
Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
gert wrote:
I do understand, and I went looking into pySerial, but it is a long
way from getting compatible with python3.x and involves other
En Sat, 04 Apr 2009 11:29:22 -0300, gert gert.cuyk...@gmail.com escribió:
On Apr 4, 12:58 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message 8bc55c05-19da-41c4-
b916-48e0a4be4...@p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, gert wrote:
with open('com1', 'r') as f
gert schrieb:
On Apr 3, 10:10 pm, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
gert wrote:
I do understand, and I went looking into pySerial, but it is a long
way from getting compatible with python3.x and involves other libs
that are big and non pyhton3.x compatible.
So don't use Python 3.0.
gert wrote:
On Apr 3, 10:10 pm, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
gert wrote:
I do understand, and I went looking into pySerial, but it is a long
way from getting compatible with python3.x and involves other libs
that are big and non pyhton3.x compatible.
So don't use Python 3.0. Most
En Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:11:12 -0300, gert gert.cuyk...@gmail.com escribió:
On Apr 4, 5:20 pm, Kushal Kumaran kushal.kuma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:10:36 +0200
Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
gert wrote:
I do understand, and I went looking into pySerial, but it is
In message 91e09eaf-5a25-4a6b-b131-
a5245970b...@f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, gert wrote:
On Apr 4, 12:58 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message 8bc55c05-19da-41c4-
b916-48e0a4be4...@p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, gert wrote:
with open('com1', 'r
=True)
while True:
with open('com1', 'r') as f:
for line in f:
print('line')
This works very well except for one thing. After a reboot I have to
launch 1 time any windows serial exe application no mater with one,
that just opens an closes the com port, before i can
subprocess import *
check_call(['mode', 'COM1:9600,N,8,1,P'],shell=True)
while True:
with open('com1', 'r') as f:
for line in f:
print(line)
This works very well except for one thing. After a reboot I have to
launch 1 time any windows serial exe
gert wrote:
I do understand, and I went looking into pySerial, but it is a long
way from getting compatible with python3.x and involves other libs
that are big and non pyhton3.x compatible.
So don't use Python 3.0. Most people are still using Python 2.5 or 2.6.
Christian
--
In message 8bc55c05-19da-41c4-
b916-48e0a4be4...@p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, gert wrote:
with open('com1', 'r') as f:
for line in f:
print('line')
Why bother, why not just
for line in open('com1', 'r') :
print line
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
from subprocess import *
check_call(['mode', 'COM1:9600,N,8,1,P'],shell=True)
while True:
with open('com1', 'r') as f:
for line in f:
print('line')
This works very well except for one thing. After a reboot I have to
launch 1 time any windows serial exe application
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
gert gert.cuyk...@gmail.com wrote:
from subprocess import *
check_call(['mode', 'COM1:9600,N,8,1,P'],shell=True)
while True:
with open('com1', 'r') as f:
for line in f:
print('line')
This works very well except for one
On Apr 2, 8:53 pm, Kushal Kumaran kushal.kuma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
gert gert.cuyk...@gmail.com wrote:
from subprocess import *
check_call(['mode', 'COM1:9600,N,8,1,P'],shell=True)
while True:
with open('com1', 'r') as f:
for line
25 matches
Mail list logo
