Robin Becker wrote:
eg for
e = enumerate([0,1,2,3,4,5])
for i,a in e:
... if a==3: break
...
for i,a in e:
... print i,a
...
4 4
5 5
I think the second loop needs to start at 3 ie the split needs to be
start, limit semantics
It would be nice to be able to fix
Robin Becker wrote:
Is there a fast way to get enumerate to operate over a slice of an
iterable?
I think you don't need that here:
e = enumerate(active_nodes)
for insert_index, a in e:
# ...
for index, a in e:
# ...
Peter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[Robin Becker]
This function from texlib in oedipus.sf.net is a real cpu hog and I determined
to see if it could be optimized.
def add_active_node(self, active_nodes, node):
Add a node to the active node list.
The node is added so that the list of active nodes is always
Peter Otten wrote:
Robin Becker wrote:
Is there a fast way to get enumerate to operate over a slice of an
iterable?
I think you don't need that here:
e = enumerate(active_nodes)
for insert_index, a in e:
# ...
for index, a in e:
# ...
Peter
I tried your solution, but I think we miss the
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
[Robin Becker]
This function from texlib in oedipus.sf.net is a real cpu hog and I determined
to see if it could be optimized.
def add_active_node(self, active_nodes, node):
Add a node to the active node list.
The node is added so that the list of active nodes is
