Deniz Dogan wrote:
> 2010/3/18 Andreas Roehler :
>> Deniz Dogan wrote:
>>> Please, don't bind C-c C-h to anything. This prevents people from
>>> viewing all the bindings that start with C-c, which C-c C-h would
>>> normally display.
>>>
>> Hi Deniz,
>>
>> it may help, if you write your suggestion i
2010/3/18 Andreas Roehler :
> Deniz Dogan wrote:
>> Please, don't bind C-c C-h to anything. This prevents people from
>> viewing all the bindings that start with C-c, which C-c C-h would
>> normally display.
>>
>
> Hi Deniz,
>
> it may help, if you write your suggestion into the bug-tracker. So it
Deniz Dogan wrote:
> Please, don't bind C-c C-h to anything. This prevents people from
> viewing all the bindings that start with C-c, which C-c C-h would
> normally display.
>
Hi Deniz,
it may help, if you write your suggestion into the bug-tracker. So it doesn't
get lost.
https://bugs.launch
Please, don't bind C-c C-h to anything. This prevents people from
viewing all the bindings that start with C-c, which C-c C-h would
normally display.
--
Deniz Dogan
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listi
2010/3/16 Tom Roche :
>
> Preparatory to an upcoming post on using/improving python-mode, I
> looked @ the code and noticed 2 apparently-easy fixes, so I pushed a
> branch to
>
> https://code.launchpad.net/~tom-roche/python-mode/improve-INSTALLATION-comment-and-custom-strings
>
> All changes are to
Deniz Dogan writes:
> 2010/3/17 Andreas Roehler :
>> Deniz Dogan wrote:
>>> 2010/3/16 Barry Warsaw :
On Mar 16, 2010, at 09:39 AM, m h wrote:
> On this note, it might be nice to create a wiki page (python.el vs
> python-mode.el) elaborating the different features found in each..
Have you tried to use CEDET with python.el? If so, how did it work?
Why I ask:
I'm a longtime (though not expert) emacs user (currently using
GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.18.0)
of 2009-09-27 on crested, modified by Debian
aka ubuntu karmic package=emacs-snapshot), n
Preparatory to an upcoming post on using/improving python-mode, I
looked @ the code and noticed 2 apparently-easy fixes, so I pushed a
branch to
https://code.launchpad.net/~tom-roche/python-mode/improve-INSTALLATION-comment-and-custom-strings
All changes are to python-mode.el:
`diff -u`
> @@ -5
summary: I'll followup with the python*el folks and CEDET regarding
current and future python development environments for GNU emacs.
details:
Tom Roche Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:47 AM
Is the near-term plan for GNU emacs (e.g. for 2010-2011) to ship
with python.el, python-mode.el, both,
On 03/16/2010 06:47 AM, Andreas Roehler wrote:
as far as I understand the OP, the focus is rather the python-environment than
the editor.
As far as it concerns editing, python.el, python-mode.el are both suitable IMHO.
Don't see a real gain by switching one for the other. If a precise feature
On Mar 18, 2010, at 09:50 AM, Andreas Roehler wrote:
>after a merge bazaar requires a local commit nonetheless.
>
>However, the difficulty and confusion IMHO arises from
>the commit-message, necessary that way also.
>
>As you may see in the current trunk now, your revision
>353 is gone completely.
Hi Barry,
after a merge bazaar requires a local commit nonetheless.
However, the difficulty and confusion IMHO arises from
the commit-message, necessary that way also.
As you may see in the current trunk now, your revision
353 is gone completely.
It's place is taken by my patch, while your ch
12 matches
Mail list logo
