On Jan 27, 2012, at 11:19 PM, François Pinard wrote:
>Soon after Guido announced his first release of Python, a long long time
>ago, I tried it. At the time, I was trying everything :-). And
>besides, I was already prejudiced towards Guido because of his competent
>implication as a maintainer of
Jeff Bauer writes:
> Hah! So funny for you to bring up *that* specific post from Barry.
:-)
> So when your email arrived, my reader threaded it back to Barry's
> 2-year-old post.
Old email, that's always fun!
Soon after Guido announced his first release of Python, a long long time
ago, I tri
On Jan 26, 2012, at 10:12 PM, Jeff Bauer wrote:
>Hah! So funny for you to bring up *that* specific post from
>Barry. It's been sitting in my inbox as msg #1 for the past
>couple years. Even though I copied it to my org notes, I've
>always had it there. So when your email arrived, my reader
>th
On Jan 26, 2012, at 10:44 PM, François Pinard wrote:
>Sigh! If only I could have developed something so attractive that Barry
>did such an offer to *me*. I spoiled my life! :-)
There's still time.
:)
-Barry
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@p
François,
Hah! So funny for you to bring up *that* specific post from
Barry. It's been sitting in my inbox as msg #1 for the past
couple years. Even though I copied it to my org notes, I've
always had it there. So when your email arrived, my reader
threaded it back to Barry's 2-year-old post.
Barry Warsaw writes:
>>How do I invoke pdbtrack from python-mode?
> It's really easy. You still insert 'import pdb; pdb.set_trace()' at the spot
> in your code where you want to break. Then run your code from a shell buffer.
> When you hit the break point, you'll drop into pdb. pdb-track will
Hey all-
I got my original wish, compile-mode error navigation through the
python stack trace of a unittest failure.
Thanks to Gerard B for the hint.
I'm doing this from pdbtrack (shell) instead of pure pdb, but it
should work in both I believe. You need to enable
compilation-shell-minor-mode.
m h wrote:
> Thanks much for the responses!
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Jan 19, 2010, at 12:18 PM, m h wrote:
>>
>>> Wow, didn't you add python support to gud?
>> If I did, it was a million years ago and I don't remember it ;).
>>
>
> :)
>
>>> Would you (or an
On Jan 19, 2010, at 06:12 PM, Jeff Bauer wrote:
>> "clickable"? Is that like using that mouse thing? To
>> paraphrase a wise man, "There's no clicking in Emacs!" :)
>
>But the track ball scroll wheel is AWESOME.
Hi Jeff! Yes, I completely agree. :)
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2010, at 04:45 PM, m h wrote:
>
>>I was using M-x ansi-shell It worked in M-x shell. Thanks.
>
> M-x ansi-term? How old am I, I didn't even know about that one? :)
>
I got tipped off to it, and honestly can't remember why I'
"clickable"? Is that like using that mouse thing? To
paraphrase a wise man, "There's no clicking in Emacs!" :)
But the track ball scroll wheel is AWESOME.
I've never tried running pdb from an emacs shell. Thanks
for the tip!
Jeff Bauer
Rubicon, Inc.
_
(forgot to reply to list)
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2010, at 03:06 PM, m h wrote:
>
>>So just to be explicit about what 'run your code from a shell buffer'. I
>>tried:
>>
>>1- C-c !
>>2- type `execfile('filename.py')` into python shell
>>3- hit breakpoint
On Jan 19, 2010, at 03:06 PM, m h wrote:
>So just to be explicit about what 'run your code from a shell buffer'. I
>tried:
>
>1- C-c !
>2- type `execfile('filename.py')` into python shell
>3- hit breakpoint/nirvana
Actually, no! Seriously, run it in a shell buffer. :)
M-x shell RET
% python f
Thanks much for the responses!
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2010, at 12:18 PM, m h wrote:
>
>>Wow, didn't you add python support to gud?
>
> If I did, it was a million years ago and I don't remember it ;).
>
:)
>>Would you (or anyone else) care to mention th
On Jan 19, 2010, at 12:18 PM, m h wrote:
>Wow, didn't you add python support to gud?
If I did, it was a million years ago and I don't remember it ;).
>Would you (or anyone else) care to mention their workflow? I've just
>been trying to get python-mode C-c C-c to allow me to use pdb. But I
>get
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2010, at 06:27 PM, m h wrote:
>
>>I'm using pdb (from gud.el) with emacs, which is working pretty good.
>>I've got two gripes.
>>
>> * After I run pdb on a testfile, the point goes to the top of the buffer
>> * I'd like to be able
On Jan 18, 2010, at 06:27 PM, m h wrote:
>I'm using pdb (from gud.el) with emacs, which is working pretty good.
>I've got two gripes.
>
> * After I run pdb on a testfile, the point goes to the top of the buffer
> * I'd like to be able to click on files in the stacktrace (on
>unittest failures) a
Hey Folks-
I'm using pdb (from gud.el) with emacs, which is working pretty good.
I've got two gripes.
* After I run pdb on a testfile, the point goes to the top of the buffer
* I'd like to be able to click on files in the stacktrace (on
unittest failures) and have emacs open the buffer to the
18 matches
Mail list logo
