-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Jan 11, 2011, at 07:40 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Am 11.01.2011 16:20, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
>> Sure. I think it's fine to JFDI for trivial patches. After all, we have a
>> version control system and post-commi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 11.01.2011 16:20, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Jan 11, 2011, at 09:55 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote:
>
>>With respect to the still considerable amount of
>>reports and a possible speed up of it's treatment, please
>>permit some reflexions
Hi Andreas,
On Jan 11, 2011, at 09:55 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote:
>With respect to the still considerable amount of
>reports and a possible speed up of it's treatment, please
>permit some reflexions, how ease the process:
>
>- as for pure typos, whitespace, indent-matters IMHO
> developers should
Hi Barry,
thanks for the merges.
With respect to the still considerable amount of
reports and a possible speed up of it's treatment, please
permit some reflexions, how ease the process:
- as for pure typos, whitespace, indent-matters IMHO
developers should be permitted to push into the trunk
