Hello all,
Thanks again for an interesting and inspiring Django Meetup. You can find
the slides of my presentation 'Down the rabbit hole, profiling your Python
code' on slideshare:
http://www.slideshare.net/sshanx/down-the-rabbit-hole-profiling-in-django/.
Of course Reinout also made notes, which
Hi,
So they're re-factoring python a bit, some backwards (incompatible) changes
to fix certain inconsistencies.
And I also knew that some other inconsistencies aren't gonna be changed,
because of backwards incompatibility.
But I didn't know that they were also introducing inconsistencies, which is
No explanation, but this is one aspect of "pythonic" that has been bothering me
of late.
The general consensus is that you should use duck typing, and in general not
have items of a different type in one place.
So the "pythonic" solution would be to have getslice, I would think, but if
that is
On 19-04-12 10:39, Remco Wendt wrote:
Next meetup will be the 4th of July. Hope to see you all there! And do
remember that anything interesting you discover, the classical A-HA
erlebnis, could be great material for a lightning talk!
And... there should be a Python meeting again somewhere in May
On 19 Apr, 2012, at 16:10, Dexter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So they're re-factoring python a bit, some backwards (incompatible) changes
> to fix certain inconsistencies.
> And I also knew that some other inconsistencies aren't gonna be changed,
> because of backwards incompatibility.
> But I didn't
I've noticed, but it just seems like they are trying to do multiple things
with one function, which doesn't look like to be in the zen of python. .
I'd reckon they should've supported extended slicing with the __getslice__
method.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 19
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 16:51, Pepijn de Vos wrote:
> No explanation, but this is one aspect of "pythonic" that has been bothering
> me of late.
>
> The general consensus is that you should use duck typing, and in general not
> have items of a different type in one place.
>
> So the "pythonic" s
