>> I suspect the win32_PortableBattery class is for machines with advanced
>> power supply management capabilities.
> Obviously it's for machines that have a *wireless* battery.
:)
Now you tell me!
Malcolm
___
python-win32 mailing list
python-win32@p
pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
I'm not entirely clear on why there are 2 battery classes and why I
would choose to use vs. the other, but I suspect the
Win32_PortableBattery class is for machines with advanced power supply
management capabilities.
Obviously it's for machines that have a *wireless*
Tim,
The problem with Win32_PortableBattery appears to be that I need to use
Win32_Battery instead.
Using the latter, everything works as expected.
I'm not entirely clear on why there are 2 battery classes and why I
would choose to use vs. the other, but I suspect the
Win32_PortableBattery class
Hi Tim,
> It looks like you're a little bit confused as to what's going on here. (Or
> maybe I am :) ).
No, I'm definitely the one that's confused! :)
> Although you *can*, you won't normally use the class as an object in its own
> right. But maybe you were just checking that you'd got the rig
On 08/03/2010 02:38, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
I'm trying to get the Win32_PortableBattery and
Win32_SystemEnclosure classes to work.
Oddly enough, both classes return empty results on my laptop. I'm
wondering if I'm using the WMI interface correctly or if I need
to be more explict in the argume
