Re: [python-win32] Bug reporting

2018-02-25 Thread Bob Kline
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Mark Hammond wrote: > 1) There's a relatively easy fix that can be made to the copy of adodbapi > which is inside pywin32. Right. Basically, I think what needs to happen is for the fork on GitHub to be brought in sync with the working

[python-win32] [ANN] pywin32 build 223 released

2018-02-25 Thread Mark Hammond
Hi all, I'm happy to announce the release of pywin32 build 223. The only significant change in this release is to help pywin32 when being installed as a wheel (ie, via pypi) - the pywin32_system32 directory is now added to PATH. Thanks to @xoviat via

Re: [python-win32] Bug reporting

2018-02-25 Thread Mark Hammond
On 26/02/2018 1:12 am, Bob Kline wrote: On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:31 AM, Mark Hammond wrote: I'm afraid Bob is going to get quite frustrated if he gets upset about responses taking more than a few days to come in. I'm going to assume you hadn't yet read the

Re: [python-win32] Bug reporting

2018-02-25 Thread Bob Kline
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Preston Landers wrote: > Is there [any] reason you can't use PyODBC? A reasonable question. This is not for a new project. When it was first started the analysis of the available options for database connection libraries came to the

Re: [python-win32] Bug reporting

2018-02-25 Thread Preston Landers
Bob, Is there are reason you can't use PyODBC? https://github.com/mkleehammer/pyodbc/wiki It is more actively maintained and I've used it successfully for years. I'm curious what adodbapi is doing for you that PyODBC can't? Are you using non-SQL data sources? thanks, Preston

Re: [python-win32] Bug reporting

2018-02-25 Thread Bob Kline
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:31 AM, Mark Hammond wrote: > I'm afraid Bob is going to get quite frustrated if he gets upset about > responses taking more than a few days to come in. I'm going to assume you hadn't yet read the thread leading up to Vernon's last message.