On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Preston Landers <pland...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there [any] reason you can't use PyODBC? .... A reasonable question. This is not for a new project. When it was first started the analysis of the available options for database connection libraries came to the conclusion that the PyODBC wasn't ready for prime time. At this point, while it might be possible to do the archaeological work needed to track down the specifics behind that decision, it would almost certainly be more profitable to do a fresh assessment at some point based on where the package is now. I can imagine that after all this time it's likely that many of the flaws have been addressed. Not a trivial exercise, you understand, to do all the testing of a large application needed to make sure nothing gets broken with a new database layer, so not something we'd undertake lightly. Assuming the effort to clean up the rough edges of the ADODB-base package goes smoothly we'll probably stick with what we're using, at least for the immediate future. But thanks for the suggestion. You never know. :-) -- Bob Kline http://www.rksystems.com mailto:bkl...@rksystems.com _______________________________________________ python-win32 mailing list python-win32@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-win32
