Ok, I'm in.
(I am a win32 guy, but am beginning to like the platform less and less)
I now successfully mix and match freely on GTK and Windows using wxPython +
PythonDotNet + Mono or .NET in full GUI apps.
It sound like this discussion is not necessarily 100% win32, or is it?
Some comments on GU
On 1 March 2011 07:44, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> From: "Greg Ewing"
>
>> Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Greg Ewing"
>>>
>>> No, if I go this way, I would probably stop maintaining
the current implementation.
>>>
>>> Oh, in that case imho I think this is a very bad idea.
>>>
>>
On 01/03/2011 10:14, David Hutto wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Tim Golden wrote:
On 28/02/2011 09:40, Tim Golden wrote:
Well, the last Svn commit was 4 weeks ago, by "barton_c", and Python27
"support" (ie switches") were added 2 months ago. Looks like "Barton_C"
needs to do some adve
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 28/02/2011 09:40, Tim Golden wrote:
>>
>> Well, the last Svn commit was 4 weeks ago, by "barton_c", and Python27
>> "support" (ie switches") were added 2 months ago. Looks like "Barton_C"
>> needs to do some advertising. I'll see if I can cont
On 28/02/2011 09:40, Tim Golden wrote:
Well, the last Svn commit was 4 weeks ago, by "barton_c", and Python27
"support" (ie switches") were added 2 months ago. Looks like "Barton_C"
needs to do some advertising. I'll see if I can contact him/her through
sf.
Got this reply from Barton, who's not
From: "Greg Ewing"
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
From: "Greg Ewing"
No, if I go this way, I would probably stop maintaining
the current implementation.
Oh, in that case imho I think this is a very bad idea.
Can you elaborate on exactly what is bad about it, and
suggest an alternative?
Window
Tim Golden wrote:
Python.NET seems to sit in an awkward
place in the ecosystem. Its niche seems to be: where you want a small
bit of .NET technology (such as SQL-SMO in my case) but don't want to
migrate any win-specific Python code. (ie stuff relying on pywin32)
Or, as in my case, you are deve
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
From: "Greg Ewing"
No, if I go this way, I would probably stop maintaining
the current implementation.
Oh, in that case imho I think this is a very bad idea.
Can you elaborate on exactly what is bad about it, and
suggest an alternative?
The standard Windows GUI API
Klonuo wrote:
>> No, if I go this way, I would probably stop maintaining
>> the current implementation. I don't want to have to
>> support two backends on Windows, and some of the things
>> I intend to do with Windows Forms would be impractical
>> to do using the raw Win32 API.
> With all due respe
Greg Ewing wrote:
> The downside is that 2k and XP users may need to install
> a .NET runtime. How would people feel about that?
Most XP users have long ago had 2.0, 3.0, and 3.5 runtimes pushed to
their systems through service packs and updates. For 2000, the run-time
installation is not very pa
On 28/02/2011 4:33 PM, Vernon Cole wrote:
So with pythoncom on one hand and pywin32 on ironclad on the other you could
go either way on either compiler? Sounds pretty neat.
Is pythoncom python3 ready? (I haven't looked at source yet.
Certainly is. I've had my wmi module running against
it fo
So with pythoncom on one hand and pywin32 on ironclad on the other you could
go either way on either compiler? Sounds pretty neat.
Is pythoncom python3 ready? (I haven't looked at source yet.
Vernon Cole
(sent from my 'droid phone)
On Feb 28, 2011 2:58 AM, "Tim Golden" wrote:
On 28/02/2011 09
On 28 February 2011 05:01, Vernon Cole wrote:
> Hmmm... projects get abandoned for many reasons.
>
> Michael:
> In your professional opinion would it be worthwhile to
> clone/fork/resurrect the pythonnet project, or is it a bad idea better left
> dead?
>
Python.NET is a great project.
Michae
On 28/02/2011 09:40, Tim Golden wrote:
On 28/02/2011 05:01, Vernon Cole wrote:
Hmmm... projects get abandoned for many reasons.
Michael:
In your professional opinion would it be worthwhile to
clone/fork/resurrect the pythonnet project, or is it a bad idea better
left dead?
... and what I mean
On 28/02/2011 05:01, Vernon Cole wrote:
Hmmm... projects get abandoned for many reasons.
Michael:
In your professional opinion would it be worthwhile to
clone/fork/resurrect the pythonnet project, or is it a bad idea better
left dead?
Well, the last Svn commit was 4 weeks ago, by "barton_c"
Hmmm... projects get abandoned for many reasons.
Michael:
In your professional opinion would it be worthwhile to
clone/fork/resurrect the pythonnet project, or is it a bad idea better left
dead?
--
Vernon
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>
>
> On 26 February 2011 20:31, G
On 26 February 2011 20:31, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Until recently I didn't think it was possible to use .NET
> libraries from CPython, but then I came across this:
>
> http://pythonnet.sourceforge.net/
>
> Using this, it looks like it should be possible to create
> a PyGUI implementation based on Win
From: "Greg Ewing"
From: Octavian Rasnita [mailto:orasn...@gmail.com]
> If it will still be possible to use the standard Win32 GUI,
> it is OK to be able to use Windows Forms as an adition.
No, if I go this way, I would probably stop maintaining
the current implementation. I don't want to have t
> No, if I go this way, I would probably stop maintaining
> the current implementation. I don't want to have to
> support two backends on Windows, and some of the things
> I intend to do with Windows Forms would be impractical
> to do using the raw Win32 API.
With all due respect to maintainers of
From: Octavian Rasnita [mailto:orasn...@gmail.com]
> If it will still be possible to use the standard Win32 GUI,
> it is OK to be able to use Windows Forms as an adition.
No, if I go this way, I would probably stop maintaining
the current implementation. I don't want to have to
support two backen
From: "Greg Ewing"
> Until recently I didn't think it was possible to use .NET
> libraries from CPython, but then I came across this:
>
> http://pythonnet.sourceforge.net/
>
> Using this, it looks like it should be possible to create
> a PyGUI implementation based on Windows Forms. This has the
That sounds very promising. Thanks for pointing this out, too. I hadn't
realized this was out there.
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Until recently I didn't think it was possible to use .NET
> libraries from CPython, but then I came across this:
>
> http://pythonnet.source
22 matches
Mail list logo
