On 28/02/2011 09:40, Tim Golden wrote:
Well, the last Svn commit was 4 weeks ago, by barton_c, and Python27
support (ie switches) were added 2 months ago. Looks like Barton_C
needs to do some advertising. I'll see if I can contact him/her through
sf.
Got this reply from Barton, who's not
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk wrote:
On 28/02/2011 09:40, Tim Golden wrote:
Well, the last Svn commit was 4 weeks ago, by barton_c, and Python27
support (ie switches) were added 2 months ago. Looks like Barton_C
needs to do some advertising. I'll see if I can
On 01/03/2011 10:14, David Hutto wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Tim Goldenm...@timgolden.me.uk wrote:
On 28/02/2011 09:40, Tim Golden wrote:
Well, the last Svn commit was 4 weeks ago, by barton_c, and Python27
support (ie switches) were added 2 months ago. Looks like Barton_C
needs
On 1 March 2011 07:44, Octavian Rasnita orasn...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
From: Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz
No, if I go this way, I would probably stop maintaining
the current implementation.
Oh, in that case imho
On 28/02/2011 05:01, Vernon Cole wrote:
Hmmm... projects get abandoned for many reasons.
Michael:
In your professional opinion would it be worthwhile to
clone/fork/resurrect the pythonnet project, or is it a bad idea better
left dead?
Well, the last Svn commit was 4 weeks ago, by barton_c,
On 28/02/2011 09:40, Tim Golden wrote:
On 28/02/2011 05:01, Vernon Cole wrote:
Hmmm... projects get abandoned for many reasons.
Michael:
In your professional opinion would it be worthwhile to
clone/fork/resurrect the pythonnet project, or is it a bad idea better
left dead?
... and what I
On 28 February 2011 05:01, Vernon Cole vernondc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm... projects get abandoned for many reasons.
Michael:
In your professional opinion would it be worthwhile to
clone/fork/resurrect the pythonnet project, or is it a bad idea better left
dead?
Python.NET is a great
So with pythoncom on one hand and pywin32 on ironclad on the other you could
go either way on either compiler? Sounds pretty neat.
Is pythoncom python3 ready? (I haven't looked at source yet.
Vernon Cole
(sent from my 'droid phone)
On Feb 28, 2011 2:58 AM, Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk
On 28/02/2011 4:33 PM, Vernon Cole wrote:
So with pythoncom on one hand and pywin32 on ironclad on the other you could
go either way on either compiler? Sounds pretty neat.
Is pythoncom python3 ready? (I haven't looked at source yet.
Certainly is. I've had my wmi module running against
it
Greg Ewing wrote:
The downside is that 2k and XP users may need to install
a .NET runtime. How would people feel about that?
Most XP users have long ago had 2.0, 3.0, and 3.5 runtimes pushed to
their systems through service packs and updates. For 2000, the run-time
installation is not very
Klonuo wrote:
No, if I go this way, I would probably stop maintaining
the current implementation. I don't want to have to
support two backends on Windows, and some of the things
I intend to do with Windows Forms would be impractical
to do using the raw Win32 API.
With all due respect to
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
From: Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz
No, if I go this way, I would probably stop maintaining
the current implementation.
Oh, in that case imho I think this is a very bad idea.
Can you elaborate on exactly what is bad about it, and
suggest an alternative?
Tim Golden wrote:
Python.NET seems to sit in an awkward
place in the ecosystem. Its niche seems to be: where you want a small
bit of .NET technology (such as SQL-SMO in my case) but don't want to
migrate any win-specific Python code. (ie stuff relying on pywin32)
Or, as in my case, you are
From: Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz
From: Octavian Rasnita [mailto:orasn...@gmail.com]
If it will still be possible to use the standard Win32 GUI,
it is OK to be able to use Windows Forms as an adition.
No, if I go this way, I would probably stop maintaining
the current
On 26 February 2011 20:31, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Until recently I didn't think it was possible to use .NET
libraries from CPython, but then I came across this:
http://pythonnet.sourceforge.net/
Using this, it looks like it should be possible to create
a PyGUI
Hmmm... projects get abandoned for many reasons.
Michael:
In your professional opinion would it be worthwhile to
clone/fork/resurrect the pythonnet project, or is it a bad idea better left
dead?
--
Vernon
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26
From: Octavian Rasnita [mailto:orasn...@gmail.com]
If it will still be possible to use the standard Win32 GUI,
it is OK to be able to use Windows Forms as an adition.
No, if I go this way, I would probably stop maintaining
the current implementation. I don't want to have to
support two
17 matches
Mail list logo
