On 30Jun2009 10:11, Dan Ross wrote:
| I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
| I can certainly add any packages I like to my Framework build so I don't
| think availability of packages is a concern.
| Unless I'm misinterpreting the term "packages"?
Yeah. You mean "package" == "python module", y
Thanks but I do not want MacPorts or fink, I want to do it myself with only
the tools of mac os x
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Fink-vs-MacPorts-vs-Framework-tp24271594p24278207.html
Sent from the Python - pythonmac-sig mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
On Jun 30, 2009, at 2:50 PM, genemartin wrote:
My experience shows me that using fink or macports with python
framework
create problems with version mismatches and library duplication. So
now, I
only use the framework because i want to learn. With a little
patience and
trying a lot (wit
My experience shows me that using fink or macports with python framework
create problems with version mismatches and library duplication. So now, I
only use the framework because i want to learn. With a little patience and
trying a lot (with the help of google), I gradually install what I want,
That makes a great deal of sense. I tried to mess with pygame at one
time, but as you stated, it was such a pain to build I gave up.
Leonardo Santagada wrote:
On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Dan Ross wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
I can certainly add any packages I like to my
Leonardo Santagada wrote:
On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Dan Ross wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
I can certainly add any packages I like to my Framework build so I don't
think availability of packages is a concern.
Unless I'm misinterpreting the term "packages"?
Pygame for
Dan Ross wrote:
> I currently use a Framework of 2.6.2 for my Python work but I always see a
> lot of posts about using Fink or MacPorts builds.
>
> Could anyone shed some light on why they use these rather than a Framework?
>
> Advantages/disadvantages?
I think the big reason is that they are
On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Dan Ross wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
I can certainly add any packages I like to my Framework build so I
don't
think availability of packages is a concern.
Unless I'm misinterpreting the term "packages"?
Pygame for example, that is a pain
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
I can certainly add any packages I like to my Framework build so I don't
think availability of packages is a concern.
Unless I'm misinterpreting the term "packages"?
On Tue, June 30, 2009 8:11 am, Alexandre Quessy wrote:
> Hi !
> Seems to me there are a l
Hi !
Seems to me there are a lot of python packages that are available
through the MacPorts. In the built-in framework, there are only a few
basic packages. Fink gives the same benefits than MacPorts, but there
might be fewer packages available though it than through MacPorts.
That's why I use MacP
I currently use a Framework of 2.6.2 for my Python work but I always see a
lot of posts about using Fink or MacPorts builds.
Could anyone shed some light on why they use these rather than a Framework?
Advantages/disadvantages?
Thanks,
Dan
___
Pythonm
11 matches
Mail list logo
