Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] [Pyobjc-dev] Towards PyObjC 3.0

2014-06-03 Thread Nicholas Cole
Hi Roland, Could we all have an update on development plans? Do you think PyObjC is going to work nicely with OS X 10.10? N. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > On 4 Jul, 2013, at 17:08, Ronald Oussoren wrote: >> >> My self-imposed dead-line for a 3.0 release is "befo

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] [Pyobjc-dev] Towards PyObjC 3.0

2014-06-03 Thread Adam Morris
I'm also very eager to hear an update, but PyObjC is going to be competing with Swift now! > On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:59 PM, Nicholas Cole wrote: > > Hi Roland, > > Could we all have an update on development plans? Do you think PyObjC > is going to work nicely with OS X 10.10? > > N. > > On Mon

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] [Pyobjc-dev] Towards PyObjC 3.0

2014-06-03 Thread Ronald Oussoren
Hi, I'm continuing to work on PyObjC and hope to push a release to PyPI next weekend.  Development is going very slowly at the moment due to lack of time on my end, I'm doing all development in my spare time and that's filled with other stuff at the moment (and has been for a while). I have n

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] [Pyobjc-dev] Towards PyObjC 3.0

2014-06-03 Thread Nicholas Cole
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > From what I've seen so far, and that's only a 5 minute glance at the public > documentation, Swift will be a competing product as an easy scripting-like > way to build applications. That's no reason to stop work on PyObjC though, > I'm usi

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] [Pyobjc-dev] Towards PyObjC 3.0

2014-06-03 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 03 Jun 2014, at 15:00, Nicholas Cole wrote: > In fact, if you are right that > there is now some kind of translation table that could make PyObjC > method names even better, that would be really brilliant. I was too optimistic about that, looking at the section about methods in the Swift