> I am still in early learning mode here. I am slow, but persistant. The
> more samples I study, the more I understand. Bring on more samples :)
Hi Dan,
Your persistency is appreciated, same here ;')
The sample I mentioned is a really good starting point for you, I'm
sure!
-jelle
Hi Jelle,
I am still in early learning mode here. I am slow, but persistant. The
more samples I study, the more I understand. Bring on more samples :)
Thanks,
Dan
Jelle Feringa wrote:
>> I am really interested in your slicer. It looks like something that
>> could be used in the pursuit of slic
> I am really interested in your slicer. It looks like something that
> could be used in the pursuit of slicing up solids for use with
> dimensioned drawings (cross sectional views). It looks like a very
> interesting project.
Hi Dan,
How are you progressing with the dimensioned drawings?
Recent
jelle feringa a écrit :
>>> - The shapeTypeString(shapetype) function is very convenient and could
>>> be added to the Topology module,
>>>
>
> +1
> will add it when I return to Paris tomorrow.
>
Implemented with a dict rather than a set of if/then, something like:
{TopAbs_VERTEX:'Vertex
>> - The shapeTypeString(shapetype) function is very convenient and could
>> be added to the Topology module,
+1
will add it when I return to Paris tomorrow.
___
Pythonocc-users mailing list
Pythonocc-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonoc
Hi, Thomas thanks for your review. i've replied below.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Thomas Paviot wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I successfully ran your OccLib script (0.2). Here are my first feelings:
>
> - The shapeTypeString(shapetype) function is very convenient and could
> be added to the Topolo
Hi Dave,
I successfully ran your OccLib script (0.2). Here are my first feelings:
- The shapeTypeString(shapetype) function is very convenient and could
be added to the Topology module,
- The dumpTopology function is a good idea although it's a bit redundant
with existing WriteToString method
Thanks Thomas. I'd appreciate the feedback. I think you'll be underwhelmed--
it doesnt really do anything more than your slicers do. It does produce a
kind of cool svg file, but the files' not particularly impressive either.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Thomas Paviot wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>
Hi Dave,
Such a good news that you achieved your slice application. Thanks for
sharing your cade, I'll test it in a few hours!
Thomas
Cowdens a écrit :
> Hello, everyone:
>
> I have finally finished a halfway decent implementation of my slicer,
> and posted it on the wiki here:
>
> http://
t: Re: [Pythonocc-users] Slicer Code Posted..
Hi Dave,
How do you use this code? The reason that I ask is that I tried it this way
and got errors:
d...@dan-desktop:~/CAM/pythonOCC/samples$ python OccSlicer.py cube.stp
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "OccSlicer.py", line 5, in
i
Hi Dave,
How do you use this code? The reason that I ask is that I tried it this
way and got errors:
d...@dan-desktop:~/CAM/pythonOCC/samples$ python OccSlicer.py cube.stp
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "OccSlicer.py", line 5, in
import wxDisplay
ImportError: No module named wxD
Hello, everyone:
I have finally finished a halfway decent implementation of my slicer, and
posted it on the wiki here:
http://www.pythonocc.org/wiki/index.php/DavesSlicerProject
Thank you to Jelle and Thomas for their help.
This script will accept a STEP or STL file, and slice it into layer
12 matches
Mail list logo
