Hello,
I build pythonocc-0.5 ppa for Ubuntu natty and oneiric (lucid and
maverick currently building):
https://launchpad.net/~hmeyer/+archive/pythoncad
To get them:
sudo apt-add-repository ppa:hmeyer/pythoncad
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install python-occ
Feedback welcome. If it works out w
Thank you. But I must confess that I am by no means a proficient
package builder. Actually I'm new to python since 3 months ;-)
Currently I'm having trouble getting a working maverick package. If
someone would be willing to have a look, it would be very appreciated:
https://launchpad.net/~hmeyer/+a
Build problem circumvented (was 2.7 related). We now have packages for lucid
and maverick (2.6) as well as for natty oneiric (2.7).
Am 29.07.2011 00:50 schrieb "Thomas Paviot" :
> 2011/7/29 Henning Meyer
>
>> Thank you. But I must confess that I am by no means a profici
One remark: I disabled GEOM & SMESH due to ease and missing knowledge about
their importance.
What's the priority of including both?
Am 01.08.2011 09:58 schrieb "jelle feringa" :
>>
>> Build problem circumvented (was 2.7 related). We now have packages for
>> lucid and maverick (2.6) as well as for
Sorry - no experience regarding pypi packager or win-installer...
Am 01.08.2011 09:58 schrieb "jelle feringa" :
>>
>> Build problem circumvented (was 2.7 related). We now have packages for
>> lucid and maverick (2.6) as well as for natty oneiric (2.7).
>>
> thanks Henning, this work is *much* appre
GEOM is now included in ppa:hmeyer/pythoncad for lucid, maverick, natty.
Unfortunately no GEOM support for oneiric, as oneiric ships with
opencascade-6.5, which is currently not supported by GEOM.
Anybody out there, who is willig to fix it?
Also I made minor changes to (mostly) build files, is the
+1 for github usage!
2011/8/10 jelle feringa :
>> The pythonocc project hosting forge is currently moving from
>> googlecode/svn to github. This decision was took a few days ago, after a
>> positive experience with the OCE project, git, and github.
>
> One of the key reason why we decided to move
Sorry. I'm still learning the packaging. Due to GEOM-integration some
packages seem to be broken currently. I'm trying hard to fix this A.S.A.P.
Apologies,
Henning
Am 13.08.2011 23:40 schrieb "jelle feringa" :
>>
>> Please help me, I did the procedure and I got the PythonOCC-0.5 installed
>> with
Me please.
Am 18.08.2011 22:03 schrieb "Thomas Paviot" :
> Dear all,
>
> Please let me know if you would like to be part of the pythonocc
> 'Collaborators'. Being a collaborators enables creating private
development
> branches that can be merged into the master branch.
>
> git allows really efficie
s
>
> 2011/8/18 Thomas Paviot
>
>> r u hmeyer?
>>
>>
>> 2011/8/18 Thomas Paviot
>>
>>> What's your github nickname?
>>>
>>> 2011/8/18 Henning Meyer
>>>
>>>> Me please.
>>>> Am 18.08.2011 22:03 schrieb
Hello,
I created a ppa with a oce-0.6.0 package . Now I'm going to start
building a pythonocc package using this ppa. So - in order to build a
current pythonocc package based on oce-0.6.0: which tag should I use?
Is pythonocc-0.5 still the best choice?
Should I just use latest master?
Which other
Hello *,
I released a Ubuntu package for pythonocc [latest], versioned myself
0.5.9 (as there is no 0.6 release yet). Currently there is only a
Natty release, I'll release packages for more distributions as
requested.
You can install it as easy as:
sudo apt-add-repository ppa:hmeyer/3d
sudo apt-g
ers-ow...@gna.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Pythonocc-users digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. python-occ ppa for Ubuntu (Henning Meyer)
>>
>>
E-0.7.0 first, then pythonocc.
>
> Thank you for your contribution to both these projects.
>
> Thomas
>
> 2011/11/2 Henning Meyer
>>
>> unfortunately there are some issues after a version bump of liboce.
>> But as soon as these are resolved I try to bui
2011/11/1 Thomas Paviot :
> Has anyone else tested Henning's package?
packages [liboce1, liboce-dev, libsalome-geom, libsalome-geom-dev,
python-occ] now exist for lucid-oneiric [i386/amd64]. They should all
work fine. Please test!
sudo apt-add-repository ppa:hmeyer/3d
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt
2011/11/2 Thomas Paviot :
> of course, let's proceed step by step. OCE-0.7.0 first, then pythonocc.
is python-occ [HEAD] confirmed to work fine with OCE-0.7.0?
___
Pythonocc-users mailing list
Pythonocc-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythono
While testing the basic examples after Ubuntu packaging, I encountered
the following message, when starting helloworld.py:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "helloworld.py", line 21, in
display, start_display, add_menu, add_function_to_menu = init_display()
File "/usr/lib/pymodules/
BTW: would it make sense to create a pythonocc-light just covering the 100
or so most used classes and methods?
Am 13.12.2011 06:16 schrieb "Thomas Paviot" :
> 2011/12/12 Sébastien Ramage
>
>> Hi !
>>
>> I just compile OCE 0.8 and the last pythonocc 0.6dev and everything is
>> fine but I'm very s
Hello *,
I'm currently @28C3 in Berlin. I'd be interested in meeting other
python-occ / oce devs/ users. Anybody else?
My local Dect is 4232.
Regards,
Henning
___
Pythonocc-users mailing list
Pythonocc-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pytho
Hello *,
is there a reference api besides http://api.pythonocc.org/ - which is
quite commentless and therefore still leaves a lot of room for
questions. Or is there even an tutorial?
Or is all documentation to be based on OCC-doc? How to get it, if I
don't want to give them my personal data?
and.
20 matches
Mail list logo
