Re: [pyxb-users] PyXB and buildout

2009-12-05 Thread Tim Cook
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 07:43 -0700, Peter A. Bigot wrote: > The first problem is probably that there is no egg. I don't use > easy_install; the release is a compressed tar file of the source. So if > something's trying to make an egg out of the thing as an intermediate > step, it'll probably cr

Re: [pyxb-users] PyXB and buildout

2009-12-05 Thread Peter A. Bigot
The first problem is probably that there is no egg. I don't use easy_install; the release is a compressed tar file of the source. So if something's trying to make an egg out of the thing as an intermediate step, it'll probably crash and burn. I do some tricks in the setup.py to dynamically d

Re: [pyxb-users] PyXB and buildout

2009-12-05 Thread Tim Cook
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 05:45 -0700, Peter A. Bigot wrote: > Two things: > > Based on this, I went ahead and put the base release back up on PyPI. > Try using "PyXB==base-1.1.0" instead. There are no bundles in that, so > you might avoid the problem there. > Okay, this kind of works. It seem

Re: [pyxb-users] PyXB and buildout

2009-12-05 Thread Peter A. Bigot
Tim Cook wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Thanks for the effort. > There must be a different way for me to set this up in buildout. I'll > ask on other lists. > > Now by putting 'PyXB' in the install requires section of setup.py and > specifying PyXB = full-1.1.0 in my versions.cfg It finds the package > a

Re: [pyxb-users] PyXB and buildout

2009-12-04 Thread Tim Cook
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 19:59 -0700, Peter A. Bigot wrote: > OK, I updated PyPI with PyXB 1.1.0 and only installed the full release. > The base release has everything that's needed to download and translate > the web service and OpenGIS location schemas that come with the full > version, and is o

Re: [pyxb-users] PyXB and buildout

2009-12-04 Thread Peter A. Bigot
OK, I updated PyPI with PyXB 1.1.0 and only installed the full release. The base release has everything that's needed to download and translate the web service and OpenGIS location schemas that come with the full version, and is only 900KB (as opposed to 12MB for the full release). But since

Re: [pyxb-users] PyXB and buildout

2009-12-04 Thread Tim Cook
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 05:52 -0700, Peter A. Bigot wrote: > I hadn't heard of buildout before you mentioned it. PyXB's PyPI > presence is somewhat half-hearted, as I've avoided the whole egg thing: > I really need the distribution to install without requiring tools that > don't come with Python,

Re: [pyxb-users] PyXB and buildout

2009-12-04 Thread Peter A. Bigot
I hadn't heard of buildout before you mentioned it. PyXB's PyPI presence is somewhat half-hearted, as I've avoided the whole egg thing: I really need the distribution to install without requiring tools that don't come with Python, and without trying to go download arbitrary stuff. As such, it