Ok,
was thinking there is just a simple line/command to type...
Anyway, do you thing this is something which will be fixed soon? So should
we just wait and be patient, or should we try to find a way to leave with
this issue?
Thanks,
Dietrich
Il giorno lunedì 10 ottobre 2016 11:23:00 UTC+2,
In your suggestion the only drawback is that 'foo.py' needs to be set
manually, This would work and is acceptable but of course not optimal.
I can understand you point to not add another way to run a file.
My question/thought since in the current file execution (command) the
__file__ is not set
I am hesitant to add yet another way to run a file. Since the current directory
is changed now, would it work for you to put this at the top of your file:
__file__ = os.path.join(os.cwd(), ‘foo.py’)
From: Dietrich Pescoller
Sent: 10 October 2016 09:20
To: Pyzo
Cc: dit...@gmail.com;
Yes, but also in this case if I run the file as a script than the console
is retarted and we loose all previous work.
Effectively we are in a very same situation as we had with the current
directory setting.
Perhaps could it be the definitive solution to have the option "running as
a script"
