Re: [QA] Quick Check

2016-12-08 Thread ManojVasanth
Thanks much Andre! appreciate it -ManojKK On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 07:37 +0530, ManojVasanth wrote: > > It was indeed invisible. I was going through the wikis after long > > time and looking for document related to deployment > > https://wiki

Re: [QA] Quick Check

2016-12-08 Thread Andre Klapper
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 07:37 +0530, ManojVasanth wrote: > It was indeed invisible. I was going through the wikis after long > time and looking for document related to deployment https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Deployments in general; https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_1.29/Roadmap for the

Re: [QA] Quick Check

2016-12-08 Thread Željko Filipin
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Jon Robson wrote: > Off topic but these banners are near invisible to me and I'm sure many > others. > I'm not sure what can we do about that. I was using the usual mediawiki template. Should the template be updated to be more visible? > This problem has bit me be

Re: [QA] Quick Check

2016-12-07 Thread ManojVasanth
It was indeed invisible. I was going through the wikis after long time and looking for document related to deployment thanks ManojKK On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Jon Robson wrote: > Off topic but these banners are near invisible to me and I'm sure many > others. > > This problem has bit me b

Re: [QA] Quick Check

2016-12-07 Thread Jon Robson
Off topic but these banners are near invisible to me and I'm sure many others. This problem has bit me before when I followed an outdated guide. Can we make them more obvious or revisit them altogether(e.g. Redirect / replace entire page with link to old revision)? On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, 5:56 a.m. A

Re: [QA] Quick Check

2016-12-07 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 10:42 +0530, ManojVasanth wrote: > is this link ( pages t.. ) broken? @ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Q > uality_Assurance . Or is it just a invalid linking?. The search link is technically correct, however there are zero results nowadays. :) See the header of the page: "Thi

Re: [QA] Quick Check

2016-12-07 Thread Željko Filipin
Hi, at the top of the Quality Assurance page there is a big banner: "This MediaWiki page is inactive and kept for historical interest. It may document extensions or features that are obsolete and/or no longer supported. Do not rely on the information here being up-to-date." The link you have foll

[QA] Quick Check

2016-12-06 Thread ManojVasanth
All, is this link ( pages t .. ) broken? @ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Quality_Assurance . Or is it just a invalid linking?. [image: Inline image 1] ManojKK __