Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi Jürgen, all the question is why we got some showstoppers so > late where the code is in the snapshots since last year. We make a beta > and received no critical feedback and when we start RC builds we receive > one showstopper one after another. We shave to think how we can in the > future.

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: well it was not planned and I just noticed it when preparing the RC. It is indeed not funny and the question is why we got some showstoppers so late where the code is in the snapshots since last year. Hi, one possible reason is that we have no reliable regressions info

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/16/14 9:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/15/14 10:20 AM, Edwin Sharp wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 17:45, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and >>> the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/15/14 10:20 AM, Edwin Sharp wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 17:45, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> >> I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and >> the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very >> hot version ... >> > With a fourth release ca

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 17:45, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and > the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very > hot version ... > With a fourth release candidate on the way, I don't find it funny. Please n

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Dear Pedro and Edwin Thank you both for all your information provided. I just send a proposal to update current installation guide when fix bug 124599. http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote: > Dear Pedro > Please check exi

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC - Showstoppers?

Hi, On 06.04.2014 16:26, Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 06.04.2014 09:06, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi, we have a potential showstopper Issue 124607 - .odt with (Page-No) field in header/footer and comment for text range fails to open wi

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC - Showstoppers?

On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > > On 06.04.2014 09:06, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> we have a potential showstopper Issue 124607 - .odt with (Page-No) field >> in header/footer and comment for text range fails to open with "Read >> Error. Error re

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC - Showstoppers?

Hi, On 06.04.2014 09:06, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi, we have a potential showstopper Issue 124607 - .odt with (Page-No) field in header/footer and comment for text range fails to open with "Read Error. Error reading file" For me it is a

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC - Showstoppers?

Hi, we have a potential showstopper Issue 124607 - .odt with (Page-No) field in header/footer and comment for text range fails to open with "Read Error. Error reading file" CU Rainer -

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Dear Pedro Please check existing issue: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599 If not representing your observations, best you personally submit new issue according: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/HowToFileIssue Regards, Edwin On Sun, Apr 6, 2014, at 0:01, Pedro Lino wrote: >

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi Yuzhen, all Sorry for the delay but I was doing some more testing. Here are my findings: There is no problem updating from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1 The Startup Group, the desktop icon and the Add/Remove list are updated as expected. The problem only occurs when updating from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0 and from 4.

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi Pedro, I mean the full installation package On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Yuzhen > > Is there a patch to update 4.0.0 to 4.0.1? > Or do you mean with the full installer? > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan wrote: > > > Hi Pedro, > > > > Could you please

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi Yuzhen Is there a patch to update 4.0.0 to 4.0.1? Or do you mean with the full installer? On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the > same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Than

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Same symptom. And the shortcut named "OpenOffice 4.0.1" is still on the desktop. But these old version stuffs can be removed manually. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Yuzhen Fan wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the > same problem when i

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi Pedro, Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks! On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi all > > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update > patches have

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 04.04.2014 09:13, Pedro Lino wrote: Hi all First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers! Thanks, you're welcome. I have in

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi all First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers! I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1)

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on en_US. >From testing perspective: 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting. 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical sc

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

No problem found. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin wrote: > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now. > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> >> On

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the w

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages >>> >>> I have built with

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will >> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages >> >> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future pa

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will > continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages > > I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches > that will allow us for example to upgr

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The whole mechanism is

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Am 04/02/2014 04:45 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very hot version ... What a mere chance. :-) Marcus On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, FOLLOW

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very hot version ... On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! > > Last week I proposed a final schedu

[RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi, FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release. We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC based on revision 1583666 from th